Jump to content

Photo

Building New PC With No Knowledge


  • Please log in to reply
12 replies to this topic

#11
Miguelr23

Miguelr23

    Fan

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 257 posts

 

it has been leaked rumored that will be faster than a titan

What got "leaked" are some specs which show little improvement over the GTX 780, and that is questionable. What's been rumored is that GTX 780 Ti might be faster than Titan in order to compete with AMD's R9 290X, which is also questionable.

 

Leaks and rumors are two different things, but they are both nothing compared to proves and facts... and we have no proves and facts. So the only way to see what Nvidia is releasing is to wait until it gets released. Maybe it rocks, maybe it flops, but no one can know for sure until we see benchmarks and official specifications.

 

http://wccftech.com/...score-unveiled/

 

leaks are not always the real deal an i actually dont believe it will cost 649$ with 6gb(maybe the 3gb does)


Edited by Miguelr23, 26 October 2013 - 04:00 PM.


#12
Werne

Werne

    Criminal Scum

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1,958 posts

http://wccftech.com/...score-unveiled/

 

leaks are not always the real deal an i actually dont believe it will cost 649$ with 6gb(maybe the 3gb does)

Oh, that thread. I've seen that "benchmark of 780 TI", which doesn't actually show a damn thing other than the benchmarked card is faster than Titan/780.

 

I'm pretty damn sure it's not GTX 780 TI and that the guy is yanking their chain, mostly because the hidden card name is too short for 780 TI and leaves room for only three numbers after "NVIDIA GeForce GTX". I'd bet my left kidney that those numbers are "690". :yes:


Edited by Werne, 26 October 2013 - 04:47 PM.


#13
Thor.

Thor.

    i double dare ya to click on my avatar.

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,666 posts

No the r290x is a beast of a video card, it rivals anything on the market.

 

http://www.newegg.ca...N82E16814125479


Edited by Thor., 27 October 2013 - 03:59 AM.





Page loaded in: 1.054 seconds