The Emperor has a dragonborn lineage does not mean that all dragonborns are Emperors.
All the emperors for the past 200 years were not dragonborn.
The Emperor has a dragonborn lineage does not mean that all dragonborns are Emperors.
Hasn't there only been 2 non-Dragonborn Emperor's? During a period of which the Empire has been in decline? I don't think that's a coincidence.
It's not like Ulfric has any more claim by birthright, does he? His claim to fame and the throne is by beating the emperor in combat, right? Some say murdered. Either way, I'm quite certain my Dovakiin could defeat him in a shouting debate.
My Dovakiin is starting to consider rebuilding the Blades back to their old glory as protectors of the emperor/dragonborn, and guess who that would be.
Ulfric killed the High King of Skyrim, not the Emperor. The Dragonborn/Assassin has that privilage. As for Ulfric's legitimacy when he claims the throne, he's a Jarl by birthright, which means he has a legitimate claim to the throne of the High King, so long as the Moot agrees. Of course, when he actually announced that he'll wait for a moot he's already replaced all but one Jarl with his own supporters, and the one remaining Jarl swears fealty to him to save her own life so the Moot is nothing but a formality.
In terms of the Imperial Dragonthrone, Ulfric has no more claim than the Dragonborn.
As for the Blades, as much as i hate Delphine and Esbern for thier traditionalist, narrow sighted Dragon-Hate, the Blades usually did a much better job than the new guys...
The Emperor has a dragonborn lineage does not mean that all dragonborns are Emperors.
Edited by sajuukkhar9000, 16 January 2012 - 10:44 PM.
The Emperor has a dragonborn lineage does not mean that all dragonborns are Emperors.
No one is claiming that Dovakiin is emperor. We're exploring the idea of Dovakiin becoming emperor.
Most people want to argue based on what has come before. These traditionalists are the book scholars who think the only answers are those from their betters now deceased. I'm more of a radical. So is my Dovakiin. Plus, every other book out there seems to conflict with every other book. No one knows for sure what it means to be dragonborn or if there is a difference between being merely "dragonborn" and being "Dovakiin".
But riddle me this all you traditionalists:
If there were true Dovakiin before, why all the dragons coming back? Kind of seems to me that those dragons were buried without actually being dead. I suppose maybe we could say that killing the soul eater might then release those souls? Better not anyone kill Dovakiin then! Or that Alduin is a soul giver? But then he could just follow Dovakiin and resurrect again any dead dragons. So what is the answer, if there is one?
Edited by Khorak, 16 January 2012 - 11:14 PM.
The Dragons were killed by the previous Dovahkiin and the Akaviri Dragonguard, they were dead and buried.
However Alduin can bring back their souls, it is speculated when a dovahkiin dies all his absorbed souls get freed for Alduin to put back into the Dov.
The dov were only defeated before because Alduin was trapped in time.