32 replies to this topic

[ohGr]

PC, for reasons stated numerous times by other people. I thought that the PC version was easier to get absorbed into.

I do disagree about the Xbox's controller being bad, though.

Halo, it may look the same, but linking up 4 x-boxes for 16 player death match just isnt fun, especially with the tiny screens, playing LAN is so much fun

I can't agree about Xbox system link being boring, yet have to say that playing over a LAN connection with PCs is great.

nah, its just horrible small on the screen, you cant see anything and even with just 1v1 you need a widescreen so the line goes down verticly (or horizontal, whichever one), so it looks like you glued two screens together.

but i have found problems in lan, on a computer you have acess to many games quickly, so if someone wants to leave the start playing something else, they do so, making the game less fun, i remember this happenning at this LAN place called N2C (too expensive, and it smells there, i dont go there anymore), i was having a great game of Unreal Tournament 2003 with a few friends, one of them left because he wanted to play warcraft 3 (i swear, this game gives a bad name to strategy/rpg games), and he ended up ruining the game (we were playing the map Gael, small, and good for a 2v2), so we changed to death match, the other guy left for battlefield 1942 (great game, NEED CABLE), then it was 1v1, and it went boring from there, so there is an advantage the x-box has, people not leaving the game at will <_<

[viper7]

X-box sucks pc and ps2 rules
Bill Gates sucks
so definetly morowind is better on pc than x-box
:nazgul: No mods no tes editor no console = no fate

[Switch]

I would have to say Morrowind on PC, for all the obvious reasons stated above. I haven't ever played the XBox version, but without the CS it wouldn't be so great... not to mention, chipping AFAIK is a 100% illegal jailable offense. So I wouldn't want to be caught dead carting one of them around