When did I ever say that Skyrim has no bugs? Or that the bugs it does have are in no way game breaking? Ohh wait, never, the game is buggy, and I never denied that.
sajuukkhar9000, why are you so keen to defend the indefensible, ie Bethesda? You only have to look on these forums, any other games forum, heck even on their official forums the discontent surfaces briefly before they lock or remove the threads. You can find any number of bug reports, not all of which are due to mods, as people are having issues with Dawnguard whether or not they have mods. Not for nothing are Bethesda referred to as Bugthesda, but at least with previous games I have always found that they have patched and eventually got around to fixing bugs as well as releasing DLC. But I have NEVER had bugs as glaring as I have had with Skyrim, and I have always run heavily modded games. Whether with Morrowind (one bug with the Telvanni bride quest easily fixed with the console), Oblivion (never a single game breaker)or FO3 or FONV, nothing has had as many clangers as Skyrim for me. So it really seems like a slap in the face when all they care about is pumping out more DLC, rather than fixing what is broken.
What I do deny is the incessant whining of people who have zero idea of what it takes to develop a game. You really think the developers at Bethesda sit there and go "WELP BUGS ARE HERE BUT LETS IGNORE DEM!"?
No, Bethesda doesn't fix all the bugs because they simply cant, they don't have the budget to, and in games like Skyrim, games that have millions of possible interactions, the number of bugs will be far greater then any other game, and many of those bugs will have to remain unfixable.
In a perfect world where money and time don't exist, Bethesda would fix all the bugs, but this isn't a perfect world, and we should be thankful Bethesda let modders do what they could not.
And I defend Bethesda because I'm tired of seeing whiny, entitled, ****** constantly complain about things they either have no understanding of, or chose willingly to not understand, and have this entitled belief of "Bethesda should do everything I want when I want it", and "Bethesda not fixing every single bug is outrageous". It's that sort of attitude that makes me hate calling myself a gamer nowadays.
We should be glad Bethesda has fixed what they did, and we should be even more glad that Bethesda lets modders make the unofficial patches, If any other company made Skyrim, with as many bugs, like Activison, we would see 1 patch, then they would be all working on Elder Scrolls 6, and there would be no mods, so all the other bugs would NEVER get fixed.
The attitude of gamers nowadays is frankly revolting.
I have to agree with sajuukkhar9000 here. Yes Skyrim is buggy, and yes it can seem like Bethesda ignores it, but the fact remains that in a game on this scale (Including all other TES games and the new Fallouts) there will be errors, and some people will have more errors then others do to their individual systems, method of installation, and tweaks they have personally made.
Bethesda does care about the people who buy their product, which is why they make patches, which have to cover certain bugs that the majority of the gamers have experienced. They could stop there, but they also give us the tools to make and fix things that they don't have the luxury and time to do.
If Bethesda followed your battle plan ginnyfizz then they would spend all their time trying to conceive every possible thing that can go wrong with the game, then they wouldn't be able to make and distribute more content for the game which adds to the experience (although like Hearthfire some of it is more geared at console players then PC)



Sign In
Create Account

Back to top









