Follow Us on Twitter
Like Us on Facebook
Subscribe on Youtube
Sign In
Create Account
Agreed, this also gets a 10 from me.
Any chance of getting a savegame of this girl? http://tesnexus.com/...-1233499547.jpg Her hair and face are adorable.
SPB Tweaked HGEC Body
Started by
Site Bot
, Feb 01 2009 02:27 PM
16 replies to this topic
Back to top
#12
Posted 12 July 2010 - 05:29 AM
megashawn
-
- Members
-
- 269 posts
Fan
What on earth happened to this it was up.what is nexus going no nude content on use now?
#13
Posted 14 July 2010 - 07:25 PM
icikiro
-
- Members
-
- 257 posts
Fan
bcause the uploader not rate this file as sexual contain
#14
Posted 17 July 2010 - 12:27 AM
Isabelxxx
-
- Members
-
- 151 posts
Enthusiast
In answer to the reason due to which multiple SPB's mods have been deleted.
-Considering he/she is Japanese and the only reason to upload this was in order to share (ratings was disabled) anyone doubts he/she cared about that.
From all the files:
"Most of all, I'm sorry, I'm not good at English."
Anyone doubts that he/she was able to understand fully the rating options & rules.
-I didn't see any explicit sexual contain in many files which have been deleted; at least +30 files have been deleted in this user account.
+20 without sexual content. Unquestionable.
5-10 questionable.
In this particular case there was sexual contain. Here applies the common sense I try to explain.
In others (most of them): I didn't see that because of its nonexistence.
THIS CASES ARE A DIRECT (USER BAN) & INDIRECT(FORCING FILE DELETION) VIOLATION OF USER's RIGHTS.
(ex. -I downloaded- http://www.tesnexus....e.php?id=22674; the file is deleted by the user, in fact the moderator/admin has deleted the file in an indirect way)
Not sure what means sexual contain here, but many of these files only contained armors, clothes & screen-shoots for/with girls with boobs uploaded by the author. Not nude, at most underwear. Not +18 neither +15 content.
Disney distributes content -for children- with that type of "sexual content": Ariel, The Little Mermaid.
http://dibujos-anima...llpapers-11.jpg
The main page of tesnexus: http://www.tesnexus.com/index.php (hot file section) shows sexual contain according to that rule. (today for ex.)
The main page shows images which links to:
Mod R18PN 07 - Mina Armor: http://www.tesnexus....le.php?id=32627
SG Attractive: http://www.tesnexus....le.php?id=32599
These mods contains the same content -not sexual content, not +18, not +15, etc...- uploaded by the author as multiple SPB's mods deleted.
Unfortunately the rules doesn't say anything about that:
http://www.thenexusf...rules#uploading
-Many users upload Screen-shoots with explicit nudes & other sexual contains in mods which have not any sexual content.
Obviously we know the author has fully responsibility of the actions done by other users.
And obviously we know that he/she will be connecting frequently in order to delete/report these images if that is possible.
On the other hand the rules doesn't say anything about that:
http://www.thenexusf...rules#uploading
-The author could not connect again to re-upload the files due to the way he/she has been treated.
-The author could not connect again to re-upload the files because of the language problems, the warning of banning, ...
-The author could not connect again to re-upload the files because of ...
-If the file has been deleted is because of the revision done by an admin or moderator and the posterior warning/ban to the user.
If the admin/moderator is able to understand the above reasons exposed, the admin/moderator is able to rate the file by him/her-self and add the "sexual content" tag to the mod instead of deleting the files, ban temporarily the user or force him/her to delete the files.
In those supposed to have sexual content:
So if the solution is simpler -rating it- and it would be the most logical action, why deleting the files instead of maintain them in the web? (delete=force the user to delete)
Remember that the fault in these cases was the rating, not the content. Adult content, not illegal content.
Even if those (1,2, 3 or 5?) files are deleted, it could be understandable but not logical.
But what about the others?
In those which are not applied that:
I'm seeing a serious problem. Delete the irony of some of my written words and see the criticism with sense.
The user has been forced to perform an action without reasons sustained neither by rules nor by logic.
-Considering he/she is Japanese and the only reason to upload this was in order to share (ratings was disabled) anyone doubts he/she cared about that.
From all the files:
"Most of all, I'm sorry, I'm not good at English."
Anyone doubts that he/she was able to understand fully the rating options & rules.
-I didn't see any explicit sexual contain in many files which have been deleted; at least +30 files have been deleted in this user account.
+20 without sexual content. Unquestionable.
5-10 questionable.
In this particular case there was sexual contain. Here applies the common sense I try to explain.
In others (most of them): I didn't see that because of its nonexistence.
THIS CASES ARE A DIRECT (USER BAN) & INDIRECT(FORCING FILE DELETION) VIOLATION OF USER's RIGHTS.
(ex. -I downloaded- http://www.tesnexus....e.php?id=22674; the file is deleted by the user, in fact the moderator/admin has deleted the file in an indirect way)
Not sure what means sexual contain here, but many of these files only contained armors, clothes & screen-shoots for/with girls with boobs uploaded by the author. Not nude, at most underwear. Not +18 neither +15 content.
Disney distributes content -for children- with that type of "sexual content": Ariel, The Little Mermaid.
http://dibujos-anima...llpapers-11.jpg
The main page of tesnexus: http://www.tesnexus.com/index.php (hot file section) shows sexual contain according to that rule. (today for ex.)
The main page shows images which links to:
Mod R18PN 07 - Mina Armor: http://www.tesnexus....le.php?id=32627
SG Attractive: http://www.tesnexus....le.php?id=32599
These mods contains the same content -not sexual content, not +18, not +15, etc...- uploaded by the author as multiple SPB's mods deleted.
Unfortunately the rules doesn't say anything about that:
http://www.thenexusf...rules#uploading
-Many users upload Screen-shoots with explicit nudes & other sexual contains in mods which have not any sexual content.
Obviously we know the author has fully responsibility of the actions done by other users.
And obviously we know that he/she will be connecting frequently in order to delete/report these images if that is possible.
On the other hand the rules doesn't say anything about that:
http://www.thenexusf...rules#uploading
-The author could not connect again to re-upload the files due to the way he/she has been treated.
-The author could not connect again to re-upload the files because of the language problems, the warning of banning, ...
-The author could not connect again to re-upload the files because of ...
-If the file has been deleted is because of the revision done by an admin or moderator and the posterior warning/ban to the user.
If the admin/moderator is able to understand the above reasons exposed, the admin/moderator is able to rate the file by him/her-self and add the "sexual content" tag to the mod instead of deleting the files, ban temporarily the user or force him/her to delete the files.
In those supposed to have sexual content:
So if the solution is simpler -rating it- and it would be the most logical action, why deleting the files instead of maintain them in the web? (delete=force the user to delete)
Remember that the fault in these cases was the rating, not the content. Adult content, not illegal content.
Even if those (1,2, 3 or 5?) files are deleted, it could be understandable but not logical.
But what about the others?
In those which are not applied that:
I'm seeing a serious problem. Delete the irony of some of my written words and see the criticism with sense.
The user has been forced to perform an action without reasons sustained neither by rules nor by logic.
#15
Posted 26 November 2010 - 10:12 PM
HappyShinigami
-
- Members
-
- 14 posts
Newbie
is there anywhere els i can find this mod?
#16
Posted 30 March 2011 - 08:03 PM
kurosag1
-
- Members
-
- 39 posts
Journeyman
could enybody reuplad it somewhere else or uplad modded game client with spb armors mods ?
Community Forum Software by IP.Board
Licensed to: Nexus Mods
