11643 replies to this topic

[xxt65xx]

There's still a gap on the male FarmClothes03 mesh around the belt.

Is the Xbox One version of this plugin exactly the same?

[Arthmoor]

In response to post #69903168.

Spoiler

TorchicBlaziken wrote: Is the Xbox One version of this plugin exactly the same?

It is.

[Arthmoor]

In response to post #69646078. #69647026, #69648246 are all replies on the same post.

Spoiler

mikeprichard wrote: Is it intentional that USSEP still allows a non-vampire/non-werewolf player to contract diseases from traps even with over 100% total disease resistance through equipment? I believe USKP v2.0.5 fixed the "traps impart disease even when player has 100% resist/immunity" bug only for werewolves and vampires for some reason, but I could be wrong.

Arthmoor wrote: Resistance is internally capped by the engine at 85% if you're not a werewolf or vampire. That's not within our ability to control.

mikeprichard wrote: You've confirmed that there's a 85% hard engine cap for disease resistance? I never contract diseases from animal attacks when wearing enchanted equipment totaling 100% disease resistance even though I'm neither a vampire nor werewolf; I only contract diseases from traps. Per UESP and my own testing (I allowed four skeevers to attack me over 1,500 times, and never contracted Ataxia), 100% disease resistance should in fact confer real immunity to disease - unlike all other resists, which are capped at 85%. Are traps for some reason exempt from this rule? If so, it would only be for technical reasons, not lore/logic reasons, as there's no logical reason why the same disease should somehow bypass my perfect immune system just because it was delivered by a spike instead of an animal claw. Anyway, thanks for the reply!

Yes, a hard cap has been a known thing since 2011.

[Kulharin]

There seem to be some conflicts / inconsistency with WACCF Penitus Gloves?

[Arthmoor]

In response to post #69929938.

Spoiler

Kulharin wrote: There seem to be some conflicts / inconsistency with WACCF Penitus Gloves?

The only such conflict or difference would be in what extra stuff WACCF did beyond fixing bugs.

[Kulharin]

In response to post #69929938. #69930298 is also a reply to the same post.

Spoiler

Kulharin wrote: There seem to be some conflicts / inconsistency with WACCF Penitus Gloves?

Arthmoor wrote: The only such conflict or difference would be in what extra stuff WACCF did beyond fixing bugs.

I had observed that you had blanked/deleted the male and female 1st person values of the Penitus gloves, while WACCF carries the vanilla values for these rows?

[Arthmoor]

In response to post #69929938. #69930298, #69932108 are all replies on the same post.

Spoiler

Kulharin wrote: There seem to be some conflicts / inconsistency with WACCF Penitus Gloves?

Arthmoor wrote: The only such conflict or difference would be in what extra stuff WACCF did beyond fixing bugs.

Kulharin wrote: I had observed that you had blanked/deleted the male and female 1st person values of the Penitus gloves, while WACCF carries the vanilla values for these rows?

Nope, you must be misreading that somehow: https://i.imgur.com/Ez9XWiP.png

[Serendal]

I see that I haven't any answer so I make another demand, anyone can help me? My skyrim bug and U can't launch a new game, when I want the menu just dissapeer but the backgroud is still here. Help me please I don't found anything :/

[blackpete8427]

In response to post #69939033.

Spoiler

Serendal wrote: I see that I haven't any answer so I make another demand, anyone can help me? My skyrim bug and U can't launch a new game, when I want the menu just dissapeer but the backgroud is still here. Help me please I don't found anything :/

The general troubleshooting forums would be the appropriate place to ask your question. What you're asking about is unrelated to this mod. See sticky #3 for more information on why I've locked this thread.

Edited by blackpete8427, 10 May 2019 - 08:33 am.