IS SSE More Stable than LE?

[Mercury71]

SE is 64 bit, can access more memory, and is the most stable of the two.

I'm using it with Vortex and 225 mods and have a virtually crash-free game.

 

+1. Just what i also think. I have over 300 mods installed and jsut over 200 plugins in my load order and game is running smooth at +60 fps with no crashes.

Using Vortex with Skyrim SE is so easy and works lika a charm.

The Creation Club updates (is mentioned in the thread) is not a problem since it is just to not update the game.

[yian]

I must admit that my modding practice has become much safer over the years and that might have contributed more to the stability.

[c0ax599]

IMHO it's way more stable than Skyrim LE. I've had maybe 2 CTD's while playing SE since about August '18.

 

Using approx 45 mods, none too heavy with the scripting etc. . Mainly, texture mods, CBBE, clothing, armor, player houses, etc. Nothing too game changing.

 

My old(ass) system. Circa 2012. Only upg the vid to a 1050ti and the ram to 16GB since then. I use FRAPS for checking my FPS, and it's pretty much a steady 60FPS in the game. Does dip some on occasions but not alot. I'm running Skyrim SE pretty much on the "High" Setting.

 

========================================================================

.:16:19:11:. «~c02» OS: Microsoft Windows 10 Pro - (10.0.17134) UP: 2days 2hrs 49mins

CPU: AMD Phenom II X6 1100T Processor (x64) at 3300MHz (12% Load)

GFX: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti - 4.00GB DDR5

RES: 1360x768 32bit 60Hz (old Vizio 27" TV, doesn't go any higher res.)

RAM: 5531/16357.7MB DDR3 (33.81%) [|||-------]

HDD: C: 16.31GB/148.51GB -- D: 212.98GB/931.51GB -- E: 70.38GB/931.51GB -- I: 327.68GB/1.36TB -- K: 63.41MB/100MB -- Total: 627.41GB/3.33TB

NET: AC600 Dual Band Wireless USB Adapter - 63MB/s 1.09GB In 149.05MB Out

=========================================================================

 

So I vote for more stable.