Anyway here's the article from 2013, but ditto it for the current attack. If anyone has objective evidence that Assad was behind it or any other chemical attack I'll be first in line to call for his head. Otherwise it's nothing but unsubstantiated propaganda, e.g. the final claim in this same article:
No shortage of claims, with absolutely no objective evidence of the Assad regime's involvement at least so far. Try a web search for 'assad response to chemical attack' and see what is presented for you to read. Meanwhile I think Trump is up against a timeline to get everyone more concerned about global holocaust than the silencing of his own prostitutes:
Nothing in U.S. law requires me as a private citizen to recognize a not only clearly but brazenly immoral person as my president, or as any other public official.
The last segment of this Nixon rerun, before he's legally forced from office, is Trump attempting to do to our FBI what he did to our FCC. It didn't work for Nixon and it won't for him either, unless our federal government has decayed to the point where not even our FBI cares about defending our Constitution and bringing proven fascist despots to justice.
Edited by TheMastersSon, 11 April 2018 - 04:04 PM.