LupusHegemonia - BANNED

[BigBizkit]

LupusHegemonia banned.



Reason:
Given your moderation history and after leaving disparaging comments on several mod pages over the course of months, as well as a recent refusal to cooperate with site staff regarding a permission dispute, you leave us no choice but to issue a ban.

You have been given the benefit of the doubt and staff has approached and talked to you on several occasions, yet you have continued to leave disparaging comments on mod pages.

Further, you have been given the opportunity to provide staff with the reference pictures you claim you used to create your retextures in an effort to investigate a permission dispute regarding your work. Unfortunately, you have refused to cooperate with site staff, demanding instead to "not be disturbed". I am afraid, that is not how it works.

Your general, dismissive attitude towards other members of the community as well as site staff is not conducive to a healthy community, and therefore, after several warnings, we have come to the conclusion to suspend your account.

Excerpts from the catalogue of reported comments:

“Or simply don't like the awful truth. Most of the "well known great textures mods" (don't need to tell which, search as the most endorsed ones) are simply "copy-paste-process" from textures data-banks or real photos that they added seamless effect (about 5 minutes job with the "Offset" filter of Photoshop).”

“Do you like to show you my graphics and compare them, dear author?
No, these doesn't look at all as my textures - I'm designer, I'm making textures mods for Skyrim and I'm paying VERY MUCH attention to the textures - since it's my field. Check my mods and you'll see what I mean concerning details and resolutions...

In my build, you can count the... skin holes under the hairs - and I'm using 2K this time (I left aside the 4K or 8K version of my personal textures - I don't need so much res for the NPCs). In your pics, for example, the hair are ...what, 512, 1K tops? The skin looks like plastic.

Anyways... your textures are fine (I don't care to convince you otherwise)... again, my question is... DO WE NEED DIFFERENT UV MAP graphics or the same as we do now?”

“So, I converted the model and placed it to SSE to test it.
Well... doesn't looks so good. Dear author, you took the model and you moved parts (hands/legs) and you added the breasts, but since it's using the default skin there are a lot seems on the model. In the pics here you can't see them, but if you study the model in NifSkope or ingame, you'll see cloth parts "disappearing" into the skin, or skin "pumping up from no-where" (when it's a cloth or other element placed there), etc.

So... the model looks more scary, looks more awesome... but surely needs NEW SKIN & UV MAP textures. And yes, my textures are far better than these here, I'll take some cool pics from Nifscope and post to compare them.”


“From the appearance of the NPCs (this mod and the other with the kids), it's super obvious that the author is Japanese or Asian in general.
The NPCs' faces are... total-Manga, completely non-lore friendly.”

“Eh... is it or WAS IT a DRAGON REAL, as creature, too?
Your comment is childish - less than 8 years old. Are you that much young?

If you search, any "dragon" creature in books or paintings has FOUR LEGS (the front are "hands" too) and ON HIS BACK has the wings. THESE creatures (in "Game of Thrones" or here in Skyrim) are NOT "dragons". Comprente, senior? Now, go back to your hobbit-hole.”

“If you could transform to a were-dragon, would make some sense...
Watching a normal character with a pair of dragon wings attached on his back... makes me laugh - looks too silly. “

“Eh... yeah... well, she doesn't look (AT ALL) with the famous Japanese porn actress.
I mean, she doesn't look not even 10% like her. You may change the mod's name to something else - will be fine. But as "Hitomi Tanaka preset"... nope, doesn't look like her. Hitomi looks like this, here:

http://slide.ly/view...141217e9194d576

Obviously you can't make a Skyrim model exactly like her, even a 65% would be great success. But your preset isn't even 10% close to the real model. Sorry for been negative, I'm just ultimate realistic man, I'm saying the things as they are without making them nice (the "awful truth", as they saying).”

“Poor description, poor number of pics.”

Reference post

Reference post