In response to post #75806633. #75806923, #75807088, #75807518, #75809163, #75810108, #75815753, #75816753, #75817413 are all replies on the same post. @ Eolhin: I think the outrage about the delay for this information has the main reason in the possible attack with possible stolen user data at the 8th of Nov. which nobody mentioned in the post from 20th Nov. Lemme show you what I mean: original text post 20thNov: "Due to its reliance on old IP Board code, we cannot vouch for the security of the current, dated user system, as vulnerabilities in old software code may or may not become exposed as time goes on. Such vulnerabilities could potentially be exploited by malicious actors, which is why our web team has spent a substantial amount of time upgrading the user system to bring it up to modern security standards." Its just about "may or may not" and "could" ... not about "we probably got attacked and they probably have stolen user data" The information WHY they improved their system is something everyone who has an account in the world wide web should be aware of... nobody is really safe in the internet. I am sure everybody apprechiate that they set their protection priorities higher and worked like hell on those improvements... well I do at least. I just think people are a bit disappointed on how this information situation got handled... it has sth to do with trust imo. But well, s#*! happens... we all are not free of mistakes... but humankind is able to learn from them... ;)