Jump to content

SkyLover264

Members
  • Posts

    73
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by SkyLover264

  1. When I learned of the changes regarding mod deletions, I submitted a request to have all of my uploads deleted on August 3rd, which I confirmed the next day. However, it later came to my attention that not all of my uploads were deleted, in particular, a pair of uploads I'd sent to the Caretaker went untouched.

     

    The mods in question were unofficial ports of Enai Siaion's "More Apocalypse - An Extension for Apocalypse - Magic of Skyrim" and "Wintermyst - Enchantments of Skyrim", which had been abandoned by Enai, and which I felt some people might still be interested in, but I later sent them to the Caretaker after finding out some things about Enai that I won't elaborate on here, but nevertheless, made me not want to be associated with him anymore. Then the whole archive thing happened, and I had my uploads deleted, but these two were missed.

     

    When I submitted that request to have all of my uploads deleted, I meant ALL of them, including these two. Yes, I know that they aren't my mods, technically, but I am the one who uploaded these specific versions of them, so they fall under my original deletion request, so I demand that you finish honoring my original request, and delete these two uploads. If Enai wants them back up, it will have to be fresh ports by somebody else.

  2.  

    :smile:

     

     

    I suppose, you could consider every individuals game a "cathedral" as it is made up of the efforts of many others. :D Everyone builds their own personal cathedral with their personalized game.

     

    Yeah, not really what Wrye was talking about, but hey, I liked the idea. :D

     

    I see your point of view, that's one way to think about it! Now imagine if Dark0ne makes an announcement in a few months where Nexusmods officially state that 'mod collections' are to be referred to as 'cathedrals' :ohmy: :laugh:

     

    Please don't give them any more ideas.

  3. In all honesty, I get the impression that they never planned to give us the out they are giving until people started raising a fuss about the missing delete button, which only happened because a modder who's name I can't remember accidentally uploaded the wrong mod to a page he'd just published, messaged the staff to have it removed upon realizing the button was missing, and was denied, despite having a valid reason to have the file deleted. The possibility that this situation could've been much worse genuinely frightens me.

  4. Like that was seriously what broke my heart in the last days. The conversations I had with oldschool MAs who seriously are at a loss.

     

    The MAs I know who are here for YEARS, who are just stumped and can’t believe it. And feel so horrible torn. They don’t wanna delete because they feel some obligation for the users, but they as well are super angry and disappointed and don’t wanna lose their right. And this just felt like a backstab too them.

     

    I am one of those people who buy applications or try to support with actual money. I never went premium because of the download rate, I did it to support the platform, and that in my first week on here. As my financial situation was better I supported monthly as well.

     

    This changes go probably mainly against those who were premium since years, who wanted to give back to the Plattform they use, as a MA and an end user.

     

    And those who are like - woohoooo - f*** those cry baby MAs, now they can’t take away my favorite toy anymore and most of the time anyway those who never paid a cent and use add blocker. Because f*** everyone - only ME counts.

     

    Moments like that are exactly why I isolate from humans. It’s a rotten pack that species.

     

    And on top of that - you get gaslit, trolled, shown not one ounce empathy. And have to see it unfold - what many many people think about MAs. How we are seen as horrible people, who deserve to get exploited. And that we don’t have the right to take away what we once shared. How egoistical we are because of that. And people seriously can’t self reflect and see the irony in here.

     

    Someone like Arthmoor gets belittled and gets “you have exactly 4 days left” and I could feel that dirty grin on your face as you were typing this.

     

    You might not always agree with arthmoor, maybe he can be stubborn - but by god - have some respect for him and the people who did such a massive amount of actual BENEFITIAL work for YOU, and continues to do so SINCE YEARS.

     

    THATS WHAT GETS ME! You people lack the absolute awareness of how amazing many MAs are on this Plattform and what they have to deal with since 1 f***ing MONTH!

     

    I don’t wanna imagine the pressure and the frustration, anger and bitterness an arthmoor, Kalilies, ousnius, apachii, expired, aers, Gamwich, Pathoschild(who seriously stems Stardew Valley alone) THE LIST GOES ON have to deal with in the last 4 weeks.

     

    You know how they feel - those people who WE owe everything - betrayed and trapped.

     

    Have some f***ing empathy and imagine for once how extremely frustrating it must be to be one of those with those extreme big mods - but yeah - isn’t it funny and they can all pack and go.

     

    THEY CANT! Because it’s hard.

     

    UUGGHHH…humans are just so rotten.

     

    The technical site is pretty much clear - people with knowledge say here and off nexus - this can be implemented differently.

     

    What people miss here is the point - that something COULD have been implemented differently but it wasn't and now people are of course angry and frustrated and suspicious.

     

    Just because others implement rotten things doesn't justify that others can implement rotten things and its fine.

     

    But MAINLY - have some empathy and imagine how hard this all is for Mod Authors who are here for so long, with many mods, big mods, who supported this community since so long.

    This. Exactly this.

  5. Kind of hard not to co-opt this thread when every time we try to start a thread to vent and get comfort, the mods shut it down and redirect us to this one. Actually, I guess this means that it was the mods who co-opted this thread rather than the disgruntled authors.

  6.  

     

     

     

     

    They call it spreading disinformation when you ask too many valid questions.

     

    Hmm, well sadly ... I have not seen that happen. Not saying it hasn't btw. Just I would have to see it for myself. Cause I know a lot of people who spread misinformation but act like it's just asking questions. Even questions can be presented in a manner to insinuate things that are not true.

     

     

    https://forums.nexusmods.com/index.php?/topic/10304418-ac3s-banned/

     

    Doesn't really tell me anything. All that link shows me is the staff felt that person was causing drama and throwing around misinformation. I can't confirm or deny it since I have no point of reference on what actually occurred. The reference post is off limits to me, cause I assume it's in the mod author section. But even if I did have access to it, it's not as if I can make a determination off of one post since the ban pretty much talks about multiple posts and issues.

     

     

    You just convinced me and pretty much everyone else here that you will never see the truth, simply because you do not want to see the truth. You're blocked.

     

    Funny thing is, if you look back at ac3s's posts, he was very clearly the victim, and yet they punished him rather than the people egging him on.

  7.  

    Why are you guys so far up your own butt that you think that Nexus will ignore advice from mod authors even when it is beneficial to the Nexus? You think the staff are entirely driven by spite now?

    To be perfectly honest, yes. That's exactly how I feel things are being run now. Spite for the mod authors who provide the content. Their behavior hasn't given me any reason to think otherwise either.

     

    That's how I feel too: as though they're intentionally conducting this poorly because they're angry at us for daring to point out the holes in their plans.

  8.  

     

     

    Your deliberate inability to make the connection between "I have come back to the same old excrement" and the very next sentence, "Nothing seems to change here" is simply unparalleled. But you do illustrate my point equally well, so thanks for that.

    I'm beginning to think that the presence of excrement coinciding with your presence is not a coincidence.

     

     

    I know, I make a simple set of observations and the flood gates opened. Do you have a shut off valve? Or will you continue to spew forth?

     

    I'd recommend ignoring him, as from what I've seen of him, he is deadset on having the last word.

  9. Hello,

     

    Subject: Collections, Copyrights, and Defective Master Mods

     

    Ostensibly, it's all about collections. Given that copyrights have to be

    impaired in order for collections to functions. It seems that copyrights are

    the "bill payer" to give everyone magnificent collections.

     

    What about highly popular bug ridden, non-functioning master mods?

    Without naming names, there is one particular master mod that comes to mind

    with tons of unresolved bug reports; yet there are many developers

    who make this mod a requirement anyway. No doubt, it will get

    rolled into collections.

     

    So what's gonna happen? Will "esteemed" and popular

    defective master mods yield diseased collections? Will gamers be allowed

    to download the current way, or will downloading via collections

    become mandatory? Will downloading become all or nothing?

     

    If collections are so splendid and glorious, why won't Nexus

    provide a video or collections simulation website, so that everyone

    can collectively admire and even "cheerfully" acquiesce to a

    deterioration of copyrights (before Aug 5)?

     

    Hey, I'm just a lowly gamer, not yet a mod developer. I respect mod developers'

    copyrights. I want mod developers to succeed without undue restrictions.

    Adding on to that, what about collections involving mods that are dependent on tools and frameworks that can't be auto-installed? Such as armor refits that need to be batch-built by BodySlide, mods that add new animations (which are dependent on either FNIS/Nemesis or DAR), any mod that is dependent on a script extender, any ENB preset, or any mod that requires the use of an xEdit or zEdit script.

  10.  

     

    "The Wayback Machine began archiving cached web pages in May 1996, with the goal of making the service public five years later.

    Internet Archive founders Brewster Kahle and Bruce Gilliat launched the Wayback Machine in San Francisco, California in October 2001, primarily to address the problem of website content vanishing whenever it gets changed or when a website is shut down. The service enables users to see archived versions of web pages across time, which the archive calls a "three-dimensional index". Kahle and Gilliat created the machine hoping to archive the entire Internet and provide "universal access to all knowledge" Your mods might even be there, too.

     

    Yes, and much of it is illegal.

     

    Posting something to the internet does not relinquish one's rights in the IP of that material. They get by with it because most people don't have the time, money, or bandwidth to chase it down and assert their rights in said material.

     

    I sometimes see entire articles taken from publishers with paywalls replicated in forums. That some people will copy such material does not make it legal.

     

    ETA: And frankly, even where no paywall is involved, copying rather than linking to the original deprives the original host site of the traffic.

     

    Yep, just because someone does a thing doesn't make it a legal thing to do.

     

    That archive.org does this doesn't make it legal. It's not even morally justifiable. Wholesale republication of someone's work without their permission is a copyright violation, pure and simple. It's frankly sickening to me that such a company is allowed to get away with this, and that they feel entitled to do it over the objections of the rights holders. But I'd wager it's why Nexus thinks they're above the law too. "Look, they're doing it, I guess we can too."

     

    Even more sickening that you have to pursue a DMCA takedown to get the unauthorized republications taken down from archive.org.

     

    IIRC, the reason that Archive.org is able to do what it's doing is because they're officially recognized by the IRS as a non-profit, so they have grounds to claim that it's fair use. Don't quote me on that, because I'm not 100% sure. I just know that there's a loophole that lets them do what they're doing.

  11. One thing that really bugs me about the citing of mod authors who have spoken out but not removed their content as a means to say that the exit door stampede isn't as big as we're making it out to be is that the people who do this seem under the impression that they've already decided to stay when, really, they could just be biding their time in the hopes that something to refute/prevent the many unfortunate implications that have been brought up comes to light, or at least that more information will be released that could contribute to the decision to stay or leave.

  12. In response to post #92334408. #92334578 is also a reply to the same post.


    Scyobi wrote: Spore has got to be my favoured game he's made.
    BigBizkit wrote: I've only heard good things about Spore - definitely on my list of games to check out.


    Haven't played it myself, but I've heard people say that once you get to the space stage, the game goes completely downhill. Not to mention the controversy of the SecuROM DRM that it uses.
×
×
  • Create New...