THAT guy did a LOT more than comment out 3 lines of code (script edits, dialog edits, SM quest edit, SM script complete rewrite to display proper quest markers on companion/Dogmeat bleedout). The above comment coming from the guy who made a mod that just replaces some sounds (and according to the reviews videos I've watched, not even all of them) who describes his own mod as joke mod yet comes here and says that my mod is crap! You say 'first time it came ahead', like Pew Lasers was leading legitimately when it's already been proven that there was a 4chan campaign using proxy and TOR artificially inflating Pew Lasers' numbers. I don't think you have the moral high ground so I don't think you should come here and start slinging mud. EDIT: Additionally, while EBF is the mod I submitted for the contest, I have a number of other mods that I am author and coauthor for including AWKCR and VIS. I have curated DEF_UI for Neanka and provided support for that mod. And I have written multiple tutorials on the AWKCR and DEF_UI page, contributing to the modding community beyond just the mods I've worked on. A quick search of your mods on the Nexus shows every single one being a joke mod, most are just sound replacers. Yet you come here and act like you are a pillar of the community and slam me because you think that MY mod is stupid and you believe required little effort. Pot, meet kettle. You made all that out of a single sentence? Regardless of how you look at it our mods are the least worthy contenders, and yeah people most likely proxy voted for both of them, along with many of the other mods over 1k votes. What did I do when my mod started gaining traction? I told them to stop voting for it. I didn't call your mod stupid nor did I act like a "pillar of the community".