Yes, because they've had 30 days to do all that has to be done (fix all the bugs etc.) - while Dawnguard was Xbox 360 exclusive. And I understand that perhaps 30 days is not enough to fix it all - I'm a modder and I know that modding can be difficult and require large amounts of time. I can imagine that DLCs as big as this one are even harder to create and fix. However, I just can't see how does that prevent them for telling us "Hey guys, we're fixing bugs, we don't know when we'll be done, might be tomorrow, might be in 5 years." I'm not angry at them for not telling us the date, I'm angry at them for not telling us why didn't they give us the date yet. I'm angry at them because they're keeping us in the dark. With the info we've got so far, your conclusion that they're fixing the bugs is just a petty assumption - no offense. For all we know, they may be, e.g. changing face models and textures so that every NPC in the game has a troll face. My opinion is that this whole Dawnguard delay issue is just a part of the scheme to make more money in some way. I don't know in which one because it seems that with each passing day without Dawnguard for PC/PS3, they lose more and more money (and fans). I would be very curious to find out how do these economic plans work, because most of them don't seem very sensible to me, and, if you don't mind, I'd like to expand the subject a little (you can TL;DR it if you want to). I don't understand why does Microsoft pay to have the privilege of 30 day Xbox 360 exclusive DLC. This seems like a bad idea to me because the only way in which this would help them earn more money that comes to my mind is when somebody is looking to buy a new console. If he can't decide will he buy XBOX 360 or PS3, he may say "Oh but look! If I buy Xbox 360, I won't have to wait for a month to play Dawnguard!". But I think such cases are very rare. Someone who's looking to buy a console will not base his decision on one DLC of one video game - even if that game is Skyrim. So it appears that Microsoft is actually losing money, instead of gaining. Which wouldn't be the first time. But since they are buying exclusive rights over and over again, there must be something else, something we're missing here. They somehow profit from all this, and I just don't know how. Because if the DLCs proved to be a bad investment, they would just stop buying exclusive rights for them. Bill Gates isn't crazy. So basically what I wanted to achieve by writing this long chapter about Microsoft - if they can have weird investments that don't seem to make sense, yet they do, then the same thing is applicable to Bethesda. Somehow, they're gainig money from delaying this game, and they should at least tell us how. Keeping us in the dark is very rude.