Dicecaster

That sucks. Granted, you wished for: http://ohmars.files.wordpress.com/2008/10/poltclown.jpg Nightmares for a week. I wish for an anti-Burgermacking movement.

Granted, but Thor. is completely broke, so you get: http://www.digimartz.com/images/l/201004/12701122810.jpg I wish for simplicity.

Pulls out a TF2 flamethrower and deflects the snow rockets back at billyro.

Granted. http://cheezpictureisunrelated.files.wordpress.com/2011/07/wtf-photos-videos-death-by-jelly-monster.jpg Swimming in jellyfish-monstrosity-infested waters it is. I wish to better know how to play MUD1*. *For those interested . . .

Granted, but it only runs at about 5 mph (but, that's what you get for a car that runs on air). I wish for a gigantic slice of chocolate pie (small enough, however, that I cannot be crushed by its weight).

Fine. Here's what's inside: http://www.cbarks.dk/Digital/gia195909.jpg I wish I could play this game without wishing.

Granted. http://ericlightborn.files.wordpress.com/2010/02/library_of_congress_3-sized1.jpg However, you find some difficulty fitting it into your house. I wish I knew what a double post was.

Granted, but you're the village idiot who ends up poisoning himself with his own arrows (which we knew shouldn't have been given to you in the first place). I wish I knew what Chuck Norris thought about everyone basically calling him a super-being. Btw: Nice touch spelling Na'vi correctly.

Granted. http://images.inquirer.net/media/sports/articles/images/pic-06170334110745.jpg The aliens (sorry, foreigners) are angry at you for disturbing their poker game. I wish the world to be flat.

@Fonger I'm sorry for not replying earlier: I tried what you said, and each computer can now access the other's public folders, users, and (supposedly) their printers. However, the rest of the computer's files are still off limits. @evilneko To tell you the truth, I'm not sure. The problem is, when I make a local game on one computer, the other sees it, but can't join to it. I made the assumption that that had something to do with a problem with file sharing. And, if that's not the case, I'd still like to fix the sharing problem anyway.

Granted. This is your father: http://www.your-lifestyleonline.com/images/how-to11.jpg And this is your house: http://www.pugslope.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/mr-miyagi.jpg I wish I had a supercomputer with a 500 pedabyte hard drive.

Granted, but remember the old proverb: http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_ir6h9Q90O7g/TS1PZ5Ld4PI/AAAAAAAACOo/zeXAJ6GYofI/s400/a+sharp+tongue.jpg I wish to see Planet of the Apes.

Granted, but you have to eat this to get it: http://www.instructables.com/image/FG1CCQQFI36FRJM/quot1UP-Mushroomquot-Mushroom-Burger.jpg I wish I had a prehensile tail.

No? He deems not adhering to a certain ideal "evil". Tell me how that would not condemn those who don't adhere to this ideal. Furthermore I am not at all attempting to distort what anyone is saying. I apologize, what I said was unwarranted. What I mean to say is that if someone posts in a debate thread, they state their current idea/theory/etc., but are open to its discussion, therefore meaning he is not necessarily condemning of everyone else's ideas. Is it? Fair enough. Lets say nature is everything around us except for ourselves and whatever we have created. If there is no evidence of anything in nature that could be defined as "evil", then where else but humanity could "evil" come from then? I would agree, but humanity is a part of nature, so you can't really say that. Laws of physics, like all laws of nature, cannot be bended, circumvented, broken or plainly ignored (well except maybe in a singularity). If there would indeed be "moral laws of nature", then those would need to be obeyed at all times as well. If that's true then every single person would have no choice but to obey those "moral laws". Extremely unlikely. Life would only be able to get better. (which is obviously not the case) Okay, not just like the laws of physics, that was a poor representation. They are natural laws in that they are . . . omni-true (if you understand my meaning). I'm also rather curious as to what those laws would be then. Could you provide evidence or an example of those laws being in place? Sounds like wishful thinking to me. Being natural laws, they are scientifically discover-able. That's what judges used to do, they were scientists that found and applied these natural laws. Mr. Richard J. Maybury has done research on the subject, and two Fundamental Laws were found before natural law scientists disappeared. Essentially: 1. Do all you have agreed to do, and 2. Do not encroach on other persons or their property.

Granted, but you feel guilty for making the wish and smite yourself. I wish I could have Minecraft for free.

Absolutely, they're made with a slightly less sucky quality. I wish I could have been more creative with that last corruption.

Fine, but I don't know what you're going to do with all that water. I wish the anti-sheep movement would lend me some resources to take down this so-called "burgermacking".

I suppose that's true. Fair enough, you win this one. Another thing: many posters are assuming that a given extraterrestrial people would have most or all of their political problems and such solved, but that's not necessarily the case. We, for example, could develop spaceships and tell all their pilots, "If you meet any space aliens, shoot to kill is always the best policy." What makes alien life different? What are the chances of humanity developing inter stellar space travel anytime soon? I find it more likely humanity will blow itself up before that point. If we don't blow ourselves up, then we will probably be quite peaceful by the time we get to that point. 100 years ago: "If we humans don't kill ourselves by the tie a man walks on the moon, we're bound to be very peaceful at that point." See my point?

Granted, but they're grotesquely fat ever since McDonald's was born. I wish the Burger King and the McDonald's guy launch mutual assaults on each other. EDIT Like this, but with Burger King: http://www.failepicfail.com/epic-fail/1106/-epic-fail-1308020135.jpg

I suppose that's true. Fair enough, you win this one. Another thing: many posters are assuming that a given extraterrestrial people would have most or all of their political problems and such solved, but that's not necessarily the case. We, for example, could develop spaceships and tell all their pilots, "If you meet any space aliens, shoot to kill is always the best policy." What makes alien life different?

Granted. Because you're still a dragon. And still extinct. I wish for world domination (for half an hour).

Granted, but they're extinct. I wish I could find some good demotivational posters for my corruptions.

I never said that love was impossible to ignore, I don't know where you pulled that from (unless you're talking to one of marharth's posts, which I missed). Now, everything in all existence has a cause. This keyboard doesn't type unless some force acts upon it, my fingers in this case. Love is not exempt from this classification. If something has a cause, it can be explained by science, because that's part of what science is. In fact, short sidetrack: science isn't test tubes and electron microscopes, it's figuring out how the world works by observation. If a kid climbs on top of his house and throws a chair off it, and concludes that chairs fall, that's science (not necessarily GOOD science, but science nonetheless). So, there is some way to explain love by science. I don't have a clue what that might be, but it is or will someday be possible. And, finally, there's no reason why love cannot have its unbelievable effects without science, logic, and reason. That is, put rather bluntly, a senseless idea.

Alright, so is it okay to destroy, damage, or detract from something if you are not doing it out of malice or hatred? For one example, suppose a lion is charging at you with the full intent to kill you; you would have left it alone, but it's not evil to kill it to save your own skin, no malice intended, correct? However, as another example, suppose you are a hit man, you illegally kill people for money; to you it's just a job, no hatred whatsoever, but you're still killing innocent people.