Ivegon

Again, couldn't agree more. People tend to underestimate social unrest. They rely on a system that could fall in 3 days. A lot of people take for granted that when they go to the nearest grocery store, it's going to be stocked. But, in reality, it only takes about a day for the stokes to go out and riots to start. And, in the US, domestic terrorism is rising. Or, at least, getting reported on the news much more. Which, only hypes the fear. Hence terrorism. So, yeah. My theory is partly because there's not enough young people in politics. It's all old 50+ who are ruling a world that ended long ago. Hence the reason we're still using fissile fuel. Which is considered an archaic power source. In fact, nations like Bulgaria, who's been trying hard to meet the criteria for joining the EU, aren't even touching the thing now that they meet it. It's turning into this ill-conceived vicious cycle.

Couldn't agree more. What I would see happening is a total social and economical collapse. Not the end...but, rather, an end. Our current world is mainly being ruled by people who's values can't be applied realistically. So, I wouldn't be a surprise to have a country like the US fall and rebuild. Because, a crescendo effect of crashes and rebuilds will most likely happen. China rely as much on the west as the west rely on china for debt. Heck, the US debt officially got up to 16 trillion dollars yesterday. Just shy of .4 trillion until they hit the debt ceiling. Meaning, hyperinflation will be a major issue once that happens. Petrodollar won't be able to keep the dollar from inflating, I fear. And, the fact that the corporations moved to the east only proves that human rights...meaning, human dignity is simply an inconvenience for them. So, why support them? Not only that, but, fissile fuel won't last us long. It's an archaic power source that can't really be used today without costs that we may not be able to pay off in the future.

Got to concur. Not much to debate about. There's nothing conclusive about the Mayan calendar. Though, we do have a multitude of important events happening around 2012. Though, will there be the end? No. Will there be an end...yes. A lot of cultural, political, governmental and economical changes are happening now-a-days. Culturally, it's going to evolve as it always does. Governmentally, more wars are progressing. Like in Syria. Politically, multiple elections are happening. Economically, the US officially hit a debt of 16 trillion dollars yesterday. And, the debt ceiling is at 16.4. And, with the euro-zone crisis still going on to a certain extent. So, if anything, it's the beginning of a new world. Where economies falls and others prosper. I don't really get people putting a massive hyperbole on "the". Like I said, if an end happens, it's a beginning of something else.

Most people think globalization is the future. But, is it truly the future? Like if point A is localization and point B is globalization. The walls between nations, economies and cultures is getting thinner and thinner. Creating good but also creating bad. Of course, the good is that it's much easier to communicate. Economy wise via trading and culture wise via human interaction. It's that inter-connectivity that's being created. Today, contrary to 100 years ago, one person can connect with a multiple array of things. We, as human beings, are a part of a bigger web. A true butterfly effect. Every time we cross the street, every time we go to bed earlier, every time we smile at a person in need of positivity, we create this ripple effect that's so big, we don't even see it ourselves. Every ripple hits more ripples. Creating a chain of changes that no one can see coming. But, with any inter-connection, if one points falls, all the points around them falls with them. If someone dies, that ripple effect creates a shock for a large number of individuals. But, it's the fact that humanity is so resilient to that shock, that the individual doesn't fall with that point. That resilience is because of one thing: adaptation. How you cope is how you adapt. How long you grieve is how much you are in shock. And, interestingly enough, we can adapt that concept to nations and economies. Most nations, at the moment are one point in the vast web. Within those nations, we have states and provinces, which are another sub-web filled with points. And, then there's towns, another sub-sub web filled with a multitude of connections. So, the inter-connection is really big. Though, it's those walls between the sub-webs and the bigger webs that guarantee that if one sub-sub point falls, the rest wont. Because, they adapts. The shock isn't so immense when you have those walls. But, what we're seeing today is the destruction of those walls. It could be good, it could be bad. One example would be the current situation in the Euro-Zone. Because of one country, one point. The ripple effects was so big that countries around Greece got effected. And the countries around them to. That ripple was dramatic because those walls were to thin. Some countries, like Poland, still operate with their own currency. And, they are seeing through a glass the effects without much shock on their economy. That's because they have a wall in terms of economy. Another issue would be one thing: Power. With absolute power comes absolute corruption. The more power you have, the more temptation you get to "join the dark side". And, that's just the facts of humanity. We can't go against that. But, because of the falls of those walls, less people are getting more power. At some point, those walls will fall. Creating a massive web of cultural and economical interconnectivity. But also creating a massive web of power connectivity. Which is tempting, to most. But, what localization is, to popular belief, is going backwards. But, is it truly going backwards? Or insuring that those walls stay strong. Back in the Renaissance, a wall between powers was erected to guarantee justice. But, now those walls between Legislative power, Jurisdictional power and Executive power is, in most cases, a façade. So, what are your thoughts? *Edit* The poll was removed to incite a discussion instead of a simple yes/no question.

I don't think the enemy is the imperials, I think it's the Thalmor. I mean, there the reason the white-concordat (?) was signed. Because most of the Empire was being overrun. Some Thalmor even calls the great war "The First war with the empire". Which implies that they are expecting another one. Even Tulius said at some point in the game that he's expecting another war. I feel as though the Thalmor want the empire to split with the white-concordat. It worked on the Red Guards which seperated from the Empire. So, I think it's all about splitting the empire so the Thalmor can easily sweep over and take out the stragglers.

Did you guys ever end up fixing the issue with changing the texture of another version of the pleximap? I need to have two different versions for a video I'm doing.

I checked it out and the weapon is from, oddly enough, RH_Ironsights. So, I will re-install that mod the manual way (not via FOMM like I usually do with my other mods) to see if it works.

Hello, I just did a clean install of my Fo3 and added all of the mods that I wanted to have. And discovered, with a new save, that I am missing a texture for a gun called .32 Service Revolver. At first, I though it was FWE. But then I thought that maybe I should prid the gun to see its RefID and it was ff0013bc which, according to FOMM, is not referenced to a Mod Index ("ff" being the mod index.FWE's main .esm mod index is 11 and the .esp main file is 45). So, right now, I am a bit lost because I hate seeing these exclamation marks everywhere. Any help would be appreciated. Also, here is my load order (to see what mods I have and see if there is any errors in the load order) And yes, I have Archiveinvalidation and I have MasterUpdated it with no errors.