Sibry

Not all the time, but when developers can be bothered, PC's can handle much better graphics than the consoles. I agree with you partly, in that Need for Speed: Underground 2's graphics were terrible. I'll bet EA has a sign in ever one of their offices saying "That'll do. Hurry up so we can make the public wait for the release while we do absolutely nothing." <{POST_SNAPBACK}> I have to say i also like PC games although many older games had bad gaphics but look at the new games like Doom 3 and Half-life 2 they are great.

Its not a bad fps game and has some thrills. But it also has many flaws but i won't go into them. All i can say is i did enjoy it its one of those run, shoot, run, shoot, reload, repeat over load next level same again.

Well knowing EA they will think of something. The war lasted five years so they've got more than enough to put it. Even if they have done all the big battles that most people know like Omaha they will think of more. Look at the new game Brothers In Arms. A new WWII game and even after CoD and MOH they came up with a hole new story. Thats based on true events. Theres always something to do.

Yes i agree after CoD came out i left MOH and when PA came out i just gave it a try. But CoD is the best WWII fps and CoD 2 will be hard to beat.

I've seen a small video for it and the graphics look very good. It will be something to look out for. If it ends up being better than mafia then that will be something to be proud of.

I've had this game for awhile and its good but just not as good as say CoD or the first MOH game. Its got a good story but just does not have anything new to offer us. Other than a new engine its got nothing new gameplay wise.

Call of duty: United offensive is a great expansion pack. I love the game its the best WWII FPS ever. I have a clan so take a look if you want to join. :wink2: http://hwdw.low-ping.com/main.asp