Jump to content

standalone09

Premium Member
  • Posts

    84
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by standalone09

  1. Fact is Cancer cells CAN only live in an acidic environment, Meat is acidic so as i stated before there are no non curable illnesses only non curable people :D
  2. Social Darwinism is a modern name given to various theories of society that emerged in the United States and Europe in the 1870s, and which sought to apply biological concepts of natural selection and survival of the fittest to sociology and politics.[1][2] Social Darwinists generally argue that the strong should see their wealth and power increase while the weak should see their wealth and power decrease. Different social Darwinists have different views about which groups of people are the strong and the weak, and they also hold different opinions about the precise mechanism that should be used to promote strength and punish weakness. Many such views stress competition between individuals in laissez-faire capitalism, while others motivated ideas of eugenics, racism, imperialism,[3]fascism, Nazism and struggle between national or racial groups. Nazi Germany's justification for its aggression was regularly promoted in Nazi propaganda films depicting scenes such as beetles fighting in a lab setting to demonstrate the principles of "survival of the fittest" as depicted in Alles Leben ist Kampf (English translation: All Life is Struggle). Hitler often refused to intervene in the promotion of officers and staff members, preferring instead to have them fight amongst themselves to force the "stronger" person to prevail—"strength" referring to those social forces void of virtue or principle.[39] Key proponents were Alfred Rosenberg, who was hanged later at Nuremberg. The argument that Nazi ideology was strongly influenced by social Darwinist ideas is often found in historical and social science literature.[40] For example, the Jewish philosopher and historian Hannah Arendt analysed the historical development from a politically indifferent scientific Darwinism via social Darwinist ethics to racist ideology.[41] By 1985, the argument has been taken up by opponents of evolutionary theory.[7] Such claims have been presented by creationists such as Jonathan Sarfati.[42][43][undue weight? – discuss]Intelligent design creationism supporters have promoted this position as well. For example, it is a theme in the work of Richard Weikart, who is a historian at California State University, Stanislaus, and a senior fellow for the Center for Science and Culture of the Discovery Institute.[44] It is also a main argument in the 2008 intelligent-design/creationist movie Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed. These claims are widely criticized within the academic community.[45][46][47][48][49][50] The Anti-Defamation League has rejected such attempts to link Darwin's ideas with Nazi atrocities, and has stated that "Using the Holocaust in order to tarnish those who promote the theory of evolution is outrageous and trivializes the complex factors that led to the mass extermination of European Jewry."[51] What do you think were darwin´s idea´s the base for Hitler´s Nazism "Project"?
  3. In that case i have to correct you. Yes there is scientific proof that meat has a certain health hazard to it, if you didnt knew already Cancer is mainly caused by wrong eating behaviours, "acid forming foods = cancer" because cancer cells cant live in an base chemistry environment. Now tell me if you eat an apple will that make your body be more acidic or base? :) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Otto_Heinrich_Warburg By the way i dare you to eat meat for i dont know a week should be enough to make you at least "feel" sick. xD
  4. Thought of this because on youtube people were kinda breaking there necks to justify it´s use, mostly. What do you guy´s think, can white people say it? How ok is it for black people using it since the word is degrading? Or better how "polite" "acceptable" is it using this word anyway? What is the logic behind "legalizing" another way of insulting people? to my person im white and from the balkan´s and i can live my life without using this word so no need to justify its use from my side at least.
  5. with whatever humanity come´s up next it will still be trivial compared to a "simple" fly. http://www.modernpest.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/fly.jpg
  6. <snip> Image removed by moderator as inappropriate for the open forum.~Lisnpuppy i added a bit more democracy it should be fine now :D Image removed again, don't push your luck - TVD.
  7. That sounds terrible.......
  8. One thing is also children isnt it like protesting against live itself, at least where i come from a baby is considered the maximum of what you can and should "achieve" in life. :smile: Or can we continue humanity with Science one day so that makes my thought obsolete?
  9. So that means that a married couple that is honest with each other could never get aids right? looking only from the sexual perspective obviously? if so i found the cure for aids, just dont cheat on your partner :D
  10. thanks man glad you like my stuff :)
  11. Im sry that i cant help you with your specific problem since i use 3ds max for armor import export in any case i can recommend this tutorial playlist by nightasy hell this guy teached me how to put armors into skyrim and more! maybe it will help you too :smile:
  12. http://www.nexusmods.com/skyrim/mods/55718/? hope you guys like it :3 http://picload.org/image/lplrwcw/123.png
  13. Homosexuality in animals is almost always an expression of pathology or extreme environmental turmoil. And i dont think we will ever find "Sick" Animals in the normal beauty of nature by itself. Good Job humanity your not only killing yourself with certain life styles but our friends the animals suffer too if not worse. :smile: (ps im not refering to homosexuality captain obvious) Never doubt humanities ability to come up with newer, faster, more efficient ways of killing their fellow man. It is what we are best at. SAD True Story
  14. Homosexuality in animals is almost always an expression of pathology or extreme environmental turmoil. And i dont think we will ever find "Sick" Animals in the normal beauty of nature by itself. Good Job humanity your not only killing yourself with certain life styles but our friends the animals suffer too if not worse. :smile: (ps im not refering to homosexuality captain obvious)
  15. In 1973, when homosexuality was removed from DSM-II, there was a great deal of controversy about that decision in the psychiatric community. Many psychiatrists and psychologists still believed that homosexuality was a psychopathology which must invariably cause impairment and distress. Others recognized that the impairment and distress often seen by clinicians were a byproduct of stigma and social repression of homosexuals. This group argued that the pathologization of homosexuality in the DSM was a form of social control that itself contributed to the social stigma and to the harm it did. See DSM-II_Homosexuality_Revision.pdf The famous decision did not come about as a result of a lengthy professional debate on the scientific merits. It happened in an important national political context -- the Watergate Affair -- and revelations surrounding Nixon's "Enemies List" and his conduct of the Vietnam War. This was an era in which much of academia was very loathe to be seen as authoritarian, and very sensitive to charges of political complicity in upholding the cultural status quo. This was the heyday of "humanist psychology" and of second wave feminism. The "backlash" of "angry white men" was still a gleam in the Koch brothers' eyes. This anti-authoritarian atmosphere undoubtedly contributed to the willingness of the head of the APA to "do the right thing" and remove homosexuality from the DSM. His decision occurred immediately before the actual vote, and as a result of being taken into a room in which many psychiatrists he knew personally were present and came out to him as homosexual. Thus, this major change in the legal status of homosexuals turned on a knife edge and actually had nothing to do with "scientific evidence". The issue had never been about "science", only about political prejudice posturing as "science". The fear that the APA would be stigmatized as an "establishment institution" was the primary driving factor behind the change in the DSM.
  16. Im from Serbia what opinion can i have... http://www.whatsonsanya.com/news_images/1756_1.jpg Seriously guys dont expect any personal words from me on the subject my english is horrible... :laugh:
  17. "According to the American Psychiatric Association, until 1974 homosexuality was a mental illness. Freud had alluded to homosexuality numerous times in his writings, and had concluded that paranoia and homosexuality were inseparable. Other psychiatrists wrote copiously on the subject, and homosexuality was “treated” on a wide basis. There was little or no suggestion within the psychiatric community that homosexuality might be conceptualized as anything other than a mental illness that needed to be treated. And, of course, homosexuality was listed as a mental illness in DSM-II. Then in 1970 gay activists protested against the APA convention in San Francisco. These scenes were repeated in 1971, and as people came out of the “closet” and felt empowered politically and socially, the APA directorate became increasingly uncomfortable with their stance. In 1973 the APA’s nomenclature task force recommended that homosexuality be declared normal. The trustees were not prepared to go that far, but they did vote to remove homosexuality from the list of mental illnesses by a vote of 13 to 0, with 2 abstentions. This decision was confirmed by a vote of the APA membership, and homosexuality was no longer listed in the seventh edition of DSM-II, which was issued in 1974."
  18. So is this method here to overall improve my weight painting experience? :D
  19. Immersive Sounds Author ladies and gentleman, dude i love your mods btw :D Now true words but sometimes i think maybe if i just upload a bit "more" it would be better.. in my genre that would be a whole weapon pack for example seems more attractive then one weapon in any case. Then again i see stuff like this http://www.nexusmods.com/skyrim/mods/36127/? and that proves your argument if its "nice enough" hell it will be downloaded. :)
  20. Dude this is awesome#!! didnt expected a full tutorial THANKS MAN :D
  21. thanks a bunch didnt thought of that yet! :)
  22. I can only second those nightasy tutorials helped me to make my first armors! :)
  23. Try importing it several times and also try to import it like that: import > merge :)
  24. Do you know any? thanks in advance :smile: except that one in my sig :P
  25. http://www.straphaelchurch.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/Stanna.png
×
×
  • Create New...