standalone09
-
Posts
84 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Posts posted by standalone09
-
-
Modern day scientists and psychiatrists consider homosexuality to be normal. We are also studying the behaviour in animals. It is very common in goats and we are now discovering and understanding the reasons why this happens in nature. :smile:
Homosexuality in animals is almost always an expression of pathology or extreme environmental turmoil.
And i dont think we will ever find "Sick" Animals in the normal beauty of nature by itself.
Good Job humanity your not only killing yourself with certain life styles but our friends the animals suffer too if not worse. :smile:
(ps im not refering to homosexuality captain obvious)
-
In 1973, when homosexuality was removed from DSM-II, there was a great deal of controversy about that decision in the psychiatric community. Many psychiatrists and psychologists still believed that homosexuality was a psychopathology which must invariably cause impairment and distress.
Others recognized that the impairment and distress often seen by clinicians were a byproduct of stigma and social repression of homosexuals. This group argued that the pathologization of homosexuality in the DSM was a form of social control that itself contributed to the social stigma and to the harm it did. See DSM-II_Homosexuality_Revision.pdf
The famous decision did not come about as a result of a lengthy professional debate on the scientific merits. It happened in an important national political context -- the Watergate Affair -- and revelations surrounding Nixon's "Enemies List" and his conduct of the Vietnam War.
This was an era in which much of academia was very loathe to be seen as authoritarian, and very sensitive to charges of political complicity in upholding the cultural status quo. This was the heyday of "humanist psychology" and of second wave feminism. The "backlash" of "angry white men" was still a gleam in the Koch brothers' eyes.
This anti-authoritarian atmosphere undoubtedly contributed to the willingness of the head of the APA to "do the right thing" and remove homosexuality from the DSM. His decision occurred immediately before the actual vote, and as a result of being taken into a room in which many psychiatrists he knew personally were present and came out to him as homosexual. Thus, this major change in the legal status of homosexuals turned on a knife edge and actually had nothing to do with "scientific evidence". The issue had never been about "science", only about political prejudice posturing as "science". The fear that the APA would be stigmatized as an "establishment institution" was the primary driving factor behind the change in the DSM.
-
Im from Serbia what opinion can i have... http://www.whatsonsanya.com/news_images/1756_1.jpg
Seriously guys dont expect any personal words from me on the subject my english is horrible... :laugh:
-
"According to the American Psychiatric Association, until 1974 homosexuality was a mental illness.
Freud had alluded to homosexuality numerous times in his writings, and had concluded that paranoia and homosexuality were inseparable. Other psychiatrists wrote copiously on the subject, and homosexuality was “treated” on a wide basis.
There was little or no suggestion within the psychiatric community that homosexuality might be conceptualized as anything other than a mental illness that needed to be treated. And, of course, homosexuality was listed as a mental illness in DSM-II.
Then in 1970 gay activists protested against the APA convention in San Francisco. These scenes were repeated in 1971, and as people came out of the “closet” and felt empowered politically and socially, the APA directorate became increasingly uncomfortable with their stance.
In 1973 the APA’s nomenclature task force recommended that homosexuality be declared normal.
The trustees were not prepared to go that far, but they did vote to remove homosexuality from the list of mental illnesses by a vote of 13 to 0, with 2 abstentions. This decision was confirmed by a vote of the APA membership, and homosexuality was no longer listed in the seventh edition of DSM-II, which was issued in 1974."
-
So is this method here to overall improve my weight painting experience? :D
-
Immersive Sounds Author ladies and gentleman, dude i love your mods btw :D
Now true words but sometimes i think maybe if i just upload a bit "more" it would be better.. in my genre that would be a whole weapon pack for example
seems more attractive then one weapon in any case.
Then again i see stuff like this http://www.nexusmods.com/skyrim/mods/36127/? and that proves your argument if its "nice enough"
hell it will be downloaded. :)
-
Dude this is awesome#!! didnt expected a full tutorial THANKS MAN :D
-
thanks a bunch didnt thought of that yet! :)
-
I can only second those nightasy tutorials helped me to make my first armors! :)
-
Try importing it several times and also try to import it like that: import > merge :)
-
Do you know any?
thanks in advance :smile:
except that one in my sig :P
-
http://www.straphaelchurch.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/Stanna.png
-
You are as great at dodging questions as you are as providing links to these so-called discussion of magnetism.
FYI: Non sequitur is a logical fallacy meaning an argument in which its conclusion does not follow from its premises. In other words, there is no connection between what you claim to be debating and what you are saying, which goes right along with what I stated above. I can only conclude that there is no debate, just and argument without substance.
Instead of telling me how i avoid questions (we all do it so..^^) you should post some useful links yourself im just avoiding the fact that if you post something i will tell you like the site you got it from is as trustful as not trustful, Vice verca it goes so lets spare some time. :smile:
Again the earth´s magnetic field is not a friggin Fan it isn´t pluged in a socket or something so it can go up and down whenever it wants it can Only decay.
-
And yes the whole electromagnetism thing was a non sequitir
"Non sequitur"does that mean something in the lines of " it can be true but must not be true " ? because that would be funny xD
-
We are debating about science so practically this has nothing to do with religion its my right to question EVERYTHING xD even the evolution theory.
Now i fail to see how an electromagnetic field can become stronger then weaker then stronger again thats evolutionism fantasy. :smile:
i mean if you can build me an electromagnetic field that gets stronger then weaker and then again stronger without any socket or something else i would believe you of course though the point is you cant.
BTW: ty to the mods for reopening :smile:
-
You mean the coelacanth some african fishermen caught ALIVE 100 years ago? https://www.google.at/#q=coelacanth :smile:
-
Look the strength of the electromagnetic field gets lower it doesnt stay the same i know the evolution theory tells us about a Magic Magnetic field that somehow goes skyrocket in terms of strength but then all of a sudden it magically drops... that isnt possible.
-
Electromagnetism has nothing to do with evolution.
because you cant explain it? i will write now a bit slower and more clear because you seem to have problems understanding quite simple things. :)
-
@FiftyTifty Evolutionism is basically bashing itself with statements like "yeah you know if earth created itself the electromagnetic field around it did too" So to speak Electromagnetism alone is an enigma enough for every geology professor or scientist that claims to live on a 4.5bilion year old planet. So you have much more with ignorance in common then you think. :smile:
Erm, what ya tryin' ta say here? Electromagnetism is a property of metallic mass.... no mystery there.
The Point is that an Electromagnet cannot start up then turn off and start up again on its own without an socket at least :wink: , ridiculously enough modern evolutionists are just trying to say that^^ the electromagnetic field somehow reversed in its past it got weaker then it got stronger etc... how can a serious adult man say this.
If our earth would "only" be 10000 years old then 10k years ago our earth would be something called an "magnetic star" the Sun is a star so...
now if it would be 52000 years old the magnetic field would be huge like that from a Pulsar Star... you see this year numbers arent much in "evolution theory measurement" ^^
So its impossible that our earth is older then 10k years old.
-
@FiftyTifty Evolutionism is basically bashing itself with statements like "yeah you know if earth created itself the electromagnetic field around it did too" So to speak Electromagnetism alone is an enigma enough for every geology professor or scientist that claims to live on a 4.5bilion year old planet. So you have much more with ignorance in common then you think. :smile:
-
Of course its happening the rocky mountains have an average growth rate between 100cm to 1000cm per 1000 years for the himalaya its around 500cm every 1000 years i think which basically would mean that we should not find rhino fossiles up there like we do these days^^ now considering the rate of erosion too the himalayas should have mountains of approx 40km height today, after millions years of course. :smile:
-
Well in American we have a degradation rate of 6,1cm per 1000 years now taking a look at the average height of continents today which is 623m it would "only" take us 10milion years to basically have no continents. :smile:
Obviously we dont have everywhere the same degradation rates/heights like Mount Rainier for example has a degradation rate of 1000cm in 1000 years so it really depends i´d say. :D
-
Ask Questions Share Facts and mostly discuss them NICE AND CULTURAL im Sure both sides have there own view of eroding mountains population changes over the ages and for example the age of the earth itself etc. :wink:
So...
If mountains are eroding wouldnt the earth be flat as paris hilton´s chest after billions of years?
Now...
Please Respect the Rules given [RULESHERERULES] :smile:
Hope we can have a nice cultural debate about this stuff. :smile:
I am unable to change the name of this thread. However I closed it up as post invite a religious debate. There is to be no talk about religion in this topic AT ALL....not even in theory or a theory. As long as this happens I will reopen the thread. Otherwise I will close it again. OP please remove any references that may cause a debate on a religious topic. Thank you.~Lisnpuppy
Name changed. ~Z
-
So basically i make weapons and with that sayed thats where my creativity stops :D
Just wanna ask what could i implement in my weapon mods that would actually be interesting enough to give the average
nexus user a reason to download.
Let me hear your ideas. :)
Homosexuality: The Mental Illness That Went Away
in Debates
Posted
SAD True Story