Jump to content

bacsie

Members
  • Posts

    3
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Nexus Mods Profile

About bacsie

Profile Fields

  • Country
    Germany
  • Currently Playing
    Skyrim SE

Recent Profile Visitors

818 profile views

bacsie's Achievements

Newbie

Newbie (1/14)

  • Dedicated
  • First Post
  • Week One Done
  • One Month Later
  • One Year In

Recent Badges

4

Reputation

  1. Oh great, the comment search is back! I loved the "old comment search" that apparently broke your database. The current comment search as of April 2, 2025 (i.e., today) is completely UNacceptable. Why? Because original posts with queries are displayed/listed separately from the corresponding replies to the original post. This means that queries and corresponding replies appear on different "search page results." But now, there are always 10 search results on one search page. Fatal for an original post that has received a reply, as no connection can be established. Example website: Nether's Follower Framework - NFF Search term "horse" - 262 comments on 27 pages. Original post @AnnikaMikomo from January 8, 2025, 12:07 PM on search page 7 - corresponding reply @bacsie from January 8, 2025, 5:44 PM on search page 9 (no connection can be seen). This is not an isolated case. Of course, there will be questions (posts) that never received a response. But this creates the impression that my "reply posts" are an "original post"—which is also distorted, as it looks like a monologue. Please correct this as soon as possible, presenting it correctly and understandably. Thank you.
  2. Thanks Pickysaurus for the explanation. One possible conclusion would be to update the current small blocks in the same way. If that isn't possible, the best thing to do is to add another block that will then take over the coordination. Yes, and then Nexus will soon have a "monolith" again - you should have left the old one, sorry. Edit 01 July 2024: Updating the small blocks in the same way should at best show a truly current date and not one that is perhaps a month ago.
  3. I would like to agree with RADRR1985's post, which was posted almost 14 days ago! How should the statement "improve in the future" be interpreted? This could also be the case in 2 years - for me it is already untenable NOW, an absolute deterioration with constant ignorance. For me, this feature of "user activity" is very important so that I don't have to constantly monitor their posts. If a user was actually not online, this may be OK, but if they were, the user could be forgetful or no longer attach any importance to answering. (Show me how you behave and I could probably tell who you are)
×
×
  • Create New...