Yes, you said that earlier. In what respect is she "highly sexualized" in a way that deviates from the game as it is currently sold? Is there a particular measurement? How was this determined? At the moment, it sounds like something you're just repeating without really thinking about it. Is it because Yennefer has breasts? I seem to recall having breasts at that age as well, something reflected in the player character's model in the game even without mods. That isn't "highly sexualized", that's "being a human female". Yes, the rules make it clear that there are no rules beyond the moment to moment whims of the staff, you're correct. That's kind of the problem we're discussing, and the reason you see this conversation so many times here. When people with any amount of self esteem and capacity for critical thinking see nonsensical rules being applied unevenly, and especially when they're paired to unprofessional and belligerent behavior from the paid service provider, they tend to find that cause for complaint. No self respecting person needs a bullet point explicitly granting them the right to complain about a poor experience before they feel comfortable doing so. The idea that there are people who sincerely believe such a right needs to be explicitly granted to them in a terms of service is depressing. Well put. I was personally surprised that it got taken down. Not only did it seem like a fairly innocuous mod, par the course in clothing mods (seeing as people are allowed to freely use Witcher assets, and have done so for some time) the outfit covers the character completely, except for a small bit of neckline. There is nothing inherently sexual about it. lol