Ok, I wanted to start a thread to discuss realism in a post apocalyptic setting. Point out things that are blatantly not in line with reality and make fun of stuff. This is intended to be a not so serious discussion, it's a game. Fallout always had a certain amount of "tongue in cheek" to it. First off I want to say, I am in no means a scientist. Most of what I "know" is gleaned from many different sources and in no ways reflects a proper education in the materials discussed. The Bomb itself causes: Firestorm, shockwave, emp wave. Plant life: Firestorm destroys plant life in the blast radius. This leaves lots of ash. Ash is a very good fertilizer. This causes LOTS of plant growth in the blast radius. But there would also be fallout in the area. The plants would pick this up from the ground. So any plants are considered to be radioactively contaminated. Also from my understanding plants are not as badly affected by radiation. Depending on the isotopes used in the bombs the fallout would eventually break to the point where it would no longer be an issue. That's the idea behind the vaults in the first place. To keep people alive long enough to allow for the radiation to subside. The "wasteland" should be lush with green growth. :P Nuclear Winter: It's only a theory of course, no one has experimented in causing nuclear winter. But with the sheer amount of nukes thrown during the history of fallout 3 there should have been a nuclear winter. The bombs throw enough particles into the atmosphere to block out the sun causing a serious reduction in temperature. The snow would probably be contaminated by fallout. Would the cold temperatures increase the life of the fallout? I have no idea. That's beyond me. Oh, and after the nuclear winter ended, plants would sprout from all over. Seeds can go dormant for a VERY long time. Mutations: Mutations are the cornerstone of evolution. Increased radiation can lead to faster evolution. At least theoretically. So I suppose the crazily changed creatures of the fallout world are remotely possible. Though I will say the vast majority of mutations are often fatal, or at least not beneficial to most creatures. Radiation/Fallout: Fallout is particles of the initial bomb's plutonium, uranium or whatever it is that made it go boom. I'm no nuclear physicist, so I can't say much about that aspect of things. Fallout is what causes the radiation. It can get into all sorts of things. But for creatures to be walking around that long after the blast carrying that much of the stuff... It's crazy. Radiation is not something that is catching. Radiation is emitted by the fallout. Well I've said most of what I wanted to say. Like I said before, this is intended to be a discussion, not a flame. If you want to discuss the theoretical aspects of a nuclear apocalypse, then by all means join in. If you want to flame Bethesda, please do it elsewhere. :) Oh, and if a moderator knows of a similar thread and wants to move this to that, by all means, please do so. I looked around a bit and didn't see one. Maybe I'm blind? Edit: Ok, I'm adding this note for people because I'm getting the exact response I didn't want (but not all responses are that way). I'M NOT SAYING FALLOUT SHOULD BE REALISTIC. I'm just wanting to discuss what would be involved in a realistic post nuclear apocalypse setting and the differences between it and Fallout 3. :P