bikbok Posted February 4, 2009 Share Posted February 4, 2009 I have installed the GrowlfsFO3NudeBody102-1098.7z according to the instructions.. I think. But the women aren't nude. They still have their armor on. So if I kill them and steal their armor, they are nude.But I honestly don't believe THAT was the idea behind the mod..? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thegord Posted February 4, 2009 Share Posted February 4, 2009 Did you even read the description? In standard this mod replaces the ingame underwear by a complete nude body. So yes, that was the idea behind the mod.If you search "growlf" you'll find a bunch of armors edited to reveal the naughty bits, but no, there is no "everybody walks around naked" mod. That would involve removing all armors from leveled lists (which, as far as I know, would also affect males). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smosh Posted February 4, 2009 Share Posted February 4, 2009 I have installed the GrowlfsFO3NudeBody102-1098.7z according to the instructions.. I think. But the women aren't nude. Perv! ROFL! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AdanRyder Posted February 4, 2009 Share Posted February 4, 2009 I have installed the GrowlfsFO3NudeBody102-1098.7z according to the instructions.. I think. But the women aren't nude. They still have their armor on. So if I kill them and steal their armor, they are nude.But I honestly don't believe THAT was the idea behind the mod..? Giving you "happy time" was no, not the point of the mod. The point always was that it replaces the default (and stupid ) "Underwear" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bikbok Posted February 5, 2009 Author Share Posted February 5, 2009 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nudist plz thanks for the tip about edited armor. I have to wonder why people call parts of our bodies "naughty". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thegord Posted February 5, 2009 Share Posted February 5, 2009 Because for the past couple thousand years they have been societally defined as such. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smosh Posted February 5, 2009 Share Posted February 5, 2009 I don't think of it as naughty but in the context of this game, I call running around a nuclear wasteland in the nude farking stupid! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bikbok Posted February 5, 2009 Author Share Posted February 5, 2009 Because for the past couple thousand years they have been societally defined as such. yes, by religious fascists. which sadly has been burnt into many people's brains and cultures. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thegord Posted February 5, 2009 Share Posted February 5, 2009 yes, by religious fascists. which sadly has been burnt into many people's brains and cultures. Which doesn't change the fact that the great majority of people worldwide hold to those social norms.Not trying to be contrary - simply answering your original query. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bikbok Posted February 7, 2009 Author Share Posted February 7, 2009 Which leads us to one of the basics of modern democracy; not to undermine the minorities. (there are still some relatively big societies in Africa, South-America and parts of Asia where they still have a natural view on the human body. if they cover themselves up, it's for practical reasons.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.