zcul Posted February 3, 2022 Share Posted February 3, 2022 LachlanStowe has received a formal warning. This user has now received 1 formal warnings. The warning was given for the following reason: Aggressively criticising another member and her/his contentEntitled behaviour Comments 28 January 2022 - 03:20 AM (hidden by a member of the moderation team 28 January 2022 - 03:40 AM) Easy with the attitude mate. To the average mod user it's not that obvious that the two mods are doing "the same thing", especially when you do not explicitely mention it on the description while boasting that it's "compatible".My bet here is many people will ne misled by your description and think they can bring it to their LO in synergy with BDS, more so if they think it will fill the NSUTR gap.Better leave those high horses of yours at the stable and edit the mod description adding a clear mention that BDS is incompatible. Correct me if I'm wrong but that's what modders usually do, to help their users (instead of belittling them in snappy comment replies) and to avcoid similar mishaps.Edited by LachlanStowe, 28 January 2022 - 03:21 AM. 03 February 2022, 11:15AM NOT A WORD ON BDS IN COMPATIBILITY SECTION THOUGH, the info about BDS is neatly hidden in the Q&A section while in the compatibility section you only mention riekling architecture and that "this mod is designed to be compatible". How isn't that misleading? Oh and how come my original comment came to disappear, something to do to with the simplicity of a snowflake?Edited by LachlanStowe, 03 February 2022, 11:16 AM. 03 February 2022 - 04:40 PM All right, so on one hand you're totally innocent from my first comment's disappearance it's all on the moderators, and on the other you kept a screenshot just in case. Go figure. That made me SMH chuckle. As for me yes I was briefly misled by your "compatibility" section. Good old LOOT warned me of my mistake when I tried both your mod and BDS. Exactly as I mentioned earlier, checking if it could fill the NSUTR gap and happy as can be reading the compatibility section all about compatible design.But it's probably easier to call me an idiot for not reading all the way down than admitting it's bad design to hide the main incompatibility down the Q&A, right? Not everybody wants to read the whole shebang once a clearly defined compatibility section has been found, lest when it states that the mod "has been designed to be compatible" except for some back alley riekling architecture mods. Stating that and not including that other dynamic snow mods will collide is misleading, period, and there is no point in hiding down that information in the Q&A section. There is no discussion here whatsoever, unless you had your description page tailor made by Sheogorath. That would be the only sensible explanation. Now my comment also addressed your attitude. The "what's with people" bit that was the starting point, when you are actually either bad or evil at explaining what your mod collides with. And on that attitude point you aptly confirmed you're not the best person by the way your replied and reacted to my comments.Edited by LachlanStowe, Today, 04:42 PM. Forum and Commenting Guidelines (excerpt) https://help.nexusmods.com/article/22-forum-and-commenting-guidelinesBe Civil!We do not tolerate 'trolling' or harassment of any kind. Do not belittle, discredit, or aggressively criticise another member or their content. If you do not like something or have nothing constructive to add, it's best to simply move along. Within this community, you are not inherently entitled to another's time, work, or creations. Comments or posts that imply otherwise may be subject to moderation. ReferenceThis warning was issued for what took place here, here, here, here Restrictions in placeAs part of the warning, LachlanStowe has had the following restrictions placed on his or her account: This user cannot post comments on a specific file for the foreseeable future Important links:Our terms of service Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts