Jump to content

Performance? or Quality?


MoveYouDie

Recommended Posts

I have been using fo3 "right below full settings" like 10 sample anisotropic filtering and no anti aliasing with 1280 x 720 resolution. i was fine with it (and it looked good) and i got around 30 fps with it. then i experimented and put 4 samples anti aliasing and 15 anisotropic samples and it looked so amazing that it made my other settings look like it was a ps1 game.... but, i was getting like 10-15 fps on it. ik on an FPS game, 10 frames per second will not work, but, do you think i will be able to pull it off on an RPG? or should i go with performance over quality?

 

before

 

after

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How bout both? I run my Fallout on Ultra with great performance. It depends on if you are willing to spend $ though. If you don't want to upgrade/change your system then I'd say definetly performance. On my old computer, I tried to run it for high Quality but it had terrible Performance so it was unplayable. Therefore, Performance>Quality.

 

Also, are you allowed nude pics here? Cuz I don't think you are...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

balance in the force young jedi :D

 

i have been waiting to say that for years!!

 

make it look as good as you can without dropping frame rate :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Personally, at least on Fallout, I prefer quality. I use VATS on those times every so often when killing a group of enemies would be impossible without it.

I run it with 4 samples of AA, 12 of AF, perfect water/LOD settings etc. Sure, the framerate isn't as good as it could be, but it looks amazing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...