NSFW mods

[TheLaatDovahKiin]

8 minutes ago, GhostlyComa said:

They are here now.

I guess we'll just ignore the 5 that we're moderator deleted over the last 2 days

They said they removed it because of their description.

I really wanna know what was written there

Edited April 25 by arsyajohanson

[IceBlueDragon]

9 hours ago, emeraldHunter121 said:

Apparently you don't even know the community when you're spouting crap like this.

Being a prude doesn't make you more tolerant or somehow more virtuous. 
 

Elder scrolls literally has a history of this, and would be included BY DEFAULT if it wasn't due to the ESRB. 

 

 

So calling me a prude would make you more "intelligent" and smarter, I suppose? That's very ridiculous to see that when the sexual dimension Is touched in games almost EVERYONE reacts as if I had insulted their moms. It's very weird. I didn't insult anyone nor I said how people should play according to my tastes. It's not a matter of "being prude" but Simply a description of how sexually problematic some gaming communities have grown (and people in general). I am aware of the fact that there Is a history behind these mods and it's totally okay for me: still that's not the main point. Just to end this sad discussion: it's freaky worrying that After Just 24 hours that a new game came out the Major mods requests are ones about sexual nudes content. Every reasonable Person would share my thought, without being a "prude" (so curious to see how Easy you use that Word to Simply describe a persone Who points out a problem related to sexual behavior in places where this Is not supposed to take Place). But, again, let's end this discussione, Please. If you felt offended, i apologize. Still, I would have hoped to find Other replies. 

Cheers.

[Vatanabe]

They are not "sexual" mods, sexual mods are something else, they are mods that amplify and expand the possibilities of roleplay and character creation. Fantasy heroines in skimpy clothes have been seen since the 80s in comics and cinema from 40 years ago, they are fantasy iconographies well known to fans. It is very prudish and shows little mental flexibility to categorize those who use these mods as the classic nerd without a healthy sex life, it is sad in 2025 to see people who still think this way. I have dozens of characters on Skyrim, male and female, Knights in heavy armor, archers, black-cloaked thieves, as well as 80s heroines in skimpy clothes, it's pure role play and the pleasure of meticulously creating a PG, that's all, without paraphilias or sexual dysfunctions, each of them is characterized by roleplay according to my tastes and thanks to the mods I can push myself beyond the limits of the vanilla game, having the ability to customize a character, to roleplay, in a very in-depth way thanks to these mods.. These are RPG games, in this type of game there is something called "roleplay", which is not only in the choices of dialogues or in the class but also in the aesthetic drafting of the character. These are basic things. Wanting a female character who doesn't walk like a dockworker, who doesn't look like a man when she wears a suit or armor, and emphasizing femininity for the purpose of roleplay is not a sign of sexual perversion, it's pure roleplay, please, let's try to expand these limits a bit, because in 2025 they've honestly gotten tired. You are just cataloguing people without knowing anything about them, for your personal lucubrations due to inflexibility of visions. If it seems normal to you, to me it just seems very immature and presumptuous, as well as offensive.

Honestly, I'm tired of even replying, I'm just disheartened by reading certain comments.

Edited April 25 by Vatanabe

[kelisw]

16 hours ago, IceBlueDragon said:

That's not the point. I Just get very annoyed by the fact that coomers are everywhere and want to ruin such a beautiful game as Oblivion 

how could it ruin your single player game? This seems to be the recurring problem, people trying to control the way other people play the game?

 

Also whats a coomer?

[IceBlueDragon]

1 hour ago, Vatanabe said:

They are not "sexual" mods, sexual mods are something else, they are mods that amplify and expand the possibilities of roleplay and character creation. Fantasy heroines in skimpy clothes have been seen since the 80s in comics and cinema from 40 years ago, they are fantasy iconographies well known to fans. It is very prudish and shows little mental flexibility to categorize those who use these mods as the classic nerd without a healthy sex life, it is sad in 2025 to see people who still think this way. I have dozens of characters on Skyrim, male and female, Knights in heavy armor, archers, black-cloaked thieves, as well as 80s heroines in skimpy clothes, it's pure role play and the pleasure of meticulously creating a PG, that's all, without paraphilias or sexual dysfunctions, each of them is characterized by roleplay according to my tastes and thanks to the mods I can push myself beyond the limits of the vanilla game, having the ability to customize a character, to roleplay, in a very in-depth way thanks to these mods.. These are RPG games, in this type of game there is something called "roleplay", which is not only in the choices of dialogues or in the class but also in the aesthetic drafting of the character. These are basic things. Wanting a female character who doesn't walk like a dockworker, who doesn't look like a man when she wears a suit or armor, and emphasizing femininity for the purpose of roleplay is not a sign of sexual perversion, it's pure roleplay, please, let's try to expand these limits a bit, because in 2025 they've honestly gotten tired. You are just cataloguing people without knowing anything about them, for your personal lucubrations due to inflexibility of visions. If it seems normal to you, to me it just seems very immature and presumptuous, as well as offensive.

Honestly, I'm tired of even replying, I'm just disheartened by reading certain comments.

We have radically different views about these questions, First of all I think that many gamers have a quite "disheartening" view of what "femininity" Is, judging from your considerations (Just to be clear: fantasy rpg games are not soft porn subreddits, as some gamers seem to think). I might be less flexible but I think it's far more disheartening to see that some beautiful games where some contents are not supposed to exist (because they are classic fantasy rpgs) get similar mods requests ONLY AFTER 24 HOURS since the new title came out. Jeez, it's absurd. It's NOT for the way someone decides to play per se, but more about a sociological problem, imo, which reveals that - sadly - many gamers still consider normal to add IMMEDIATELY explicit content (obv only on females; but I see that there are also similar contents on male npcs, but they are rare) In Classic fantasy rpgs. This Is Just something I wanted to point out, as an objective description of a far more problematic background (particularly common in gaming mods Community in general). If you feel attacked by my considerations, I would suggest you to read in a more analytical way what I wrote, because mine are not "presumptions" put onto you but they were Just analytical considerations about a tendency that seems extremely common (and that I find weird: though i wouldn't EVER make people stop playing according to my tastes, and if you thought so Just because you felt offended by sociologically true considerations, the problem Is yours). Really, what are we talking about? A magnificent game Just came out two days ago, some wonderful modders are at work on It, there are things to fix about content and gameplay: One of the most requested "things to adjust immediately" for some Is about getting nude females around or creating a more "feminine" character (like what? Greater boobs and butt to seem a sexual freak? In a Classic fantasy game? Ok, your taste: but jeez, it's not so urgent!)? Really? Well, okay. Sorry for you if you felt offended, but still we have radically different views. 

 

Cheers again.

[Vatanabe]

7 hours ago, IceBlueDragon said:

We have radically different views about these questions, First of all I think that many gamers have a quite "disheartening" view of what "femininity" Is, judging from your considerations (Just to be clear: fantasy rpg games are not soft porn subreddits, as some gamers seem to think). I might be less flexible but I think it's far more disheartening to see that some beautiful games where some contents are not supposed to exist (because they are classic fantasy rpgs) get similar mods requests ONLY AFTER 24 HOURS since the new title came out. Jeez, it's absurd. It's NOT for the way someone decides to play per se, but more about a sociological problem, imo, which reveals that - sadly - many gamers still consider normal to add IMMEDIATELY explicit content (obv only on females; but I see that there are also similar contents on male npcs, but they are rare) In Classic fantasy rpgs. This Is Just something I wanted to point out, as an objective description of a far more problematic background (particularly common in gaming mods Community in general). If you feel attacked by my considerations, I would suggest you to read in a more analytical way what I wrote, because mine are not "presumptions" put onto you but they were Just analytical considerations about a tendency that seems extremely common (and that I find weird: though i wouldn't EVER make people stop playing according to my tastes, and if you thought so Just because you felt offended by sociologically true considerations, the problem Is yours). Really, what are we talking about? A magnificent game Just came out two days ago, some wonderful modders are at work on It, there are things to fix about content and gameplay: One of the most requested "things to adjust immediately" for some Is about getting nude females around or creating a more "feminine" character (like what? Greater boobs and butt to seem a sexual freak? In a Classic fantasy game? Ok, your taste: but jeez, it's not so urgent!)? Really? Well, okay. Sorry for you if you felt offended, but still we have radically different views. 

 

Cheers again.

Yes you are right, we have diametrically opposed opinions. Dear, maybe you didn't realize that this is a remastered/remake of a game released in 2006 that here on Nexus boasts thousands and thousands of mods, even on skimpy clothes and armor made more feminine. It is not a new IP released yesterday, it is an Elder Scrolls that many here have played and replayed endlessly, changed almost only in the aesthetics and something of the HUD. Many users here have been playing and modding Oblivion for a lifetime and it is clear that they would like certain mods back even on the remastered.

Oblivion, like Skyrim, I've played them a thousand times, I simply know it by heart, for me and for many of us users here, they are games that we simply know by heart. If tomorrow I were to get Skyrim remastered, very used to playing it hyper modded, yes, I would enjoy the new graphics, but I would immediately want to re-modify it and re-customize it according to my tastes and how I am largely used to playing it, as vanilla, remastered or not, has also bored me a bit, after having played it a thousand times and knowing it by heart. It is obvious and expected that from this remastered fans will push to find the mods of the PG that they used on Oblivion from 2006. Come on..
I see that you are convinced of your opinions, but they are too distant from mine to be able to continue responding

Edited April 25 by Vatanabe

[IceBlueDragon]

22 minutes ago, Vatanabe said:

Yes you are right, we have diametrically opposed opinions. Dear, maybe you didn't realize that this is a remastered/remake of a game released in 2006 that here on Nexus boasts thousands and thousands of mods, even on skimpy clothes and armor made more feminine. It is not a new IP released yesterday, it is an Elder Scrolls that many here have played and replayed endlessly, changed almost only in the aesthetics and something of the HUD. Many users here have been playing and modding Oblivion for a lifetime and it is clear that they would like certain mods back even on the remastered.
I see that you are convinced of your opinions, but they are too distant from mine to be able to continue responding

I realized everything you said. The problem remains, imo, and I still find disheartening everytime I see that the adjective "feminine" Is almost Always translated into something similar to porn. Again, as I said, I don't think that remastered versions of beautiful games Need such thing (in term of priority they Absolutely don't) but of course I am glad to see that you agree with me about the fact that we share opposite point of views. Thanks again, however, for not insulting me, at least. 

[Vatanabe]

6 minutes ago, IceBlueDragon said:

Again, as I said, I don't think that remastered versions of beautiful games Need such thing

I respect your opinion, even if it's not mine, they are opinions, there are 8 billion brains in the world. In any case, these are entertainment products and it is sacrosanct that players play as they see fit, we can't agree on everything, everyone follows the path they think is best for themselves.

[Flashyatoll]

On 4/24/2025 at 10:32 AM, IceBlueDragon said:

I don't understand why nude mods should be more urgent than true and more useful mods...it's absurd how many requests about such mods have been done.

its because you said female and not type 1 

[Flashyatoll]

19 hours ago, arsyajohanson said:

They said they removed it because of their description.

I really wanna know what was written there

its because they kept saying "female" and not "type 1" they don't like gendered language