Fifoo Posted May 17, 2010 Share Posted May 17, 2010 Honestly, I'm personally against violence and war as it's a modus operandi which always means collateral murdering, and who will paid the bill : innocent people and innocent civilians, ever. The present post is not intended to point the finger at just one faulty warmonger but to show that all parties are involved in it. - Collateral Murder a topical example, but warning : this video may hurt sensible persons. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=is9sxRfU-ik&feature=player_embedded The only person to have anything in his hand was a reporter carrying a camera. - Allied war crimes during World War II - Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court. Bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. The possibility that attacks like the Hiroshima and Nagasaki bombings could be considered war crimes is one of the reasons given by John R. Bolton (Undersecretary of State for Arms Control and International Security (2001–2005) and U.S. Permanent Representative to the United Nations (2005)) for the United States not agreeing to be bound by the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court. ~ Wiki - Malgré-nous. Malgré-nous. During the Second World War 130000 French people in Alsace Moselle were conscripted to fight for Germany. They were mainly sent to Russia and Poland. Those who were tempted to desert, saw their families being deported to labour camps or concentration camps. These soldiers were known as the "Malgré-Nous" (Despite us). 42500 of them did not return at the end of war... ~ Wiki http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pzio4cpNiaY War does not determine who is right, only who is left. ~ Bertrand Russell Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pyrosocial Posted May 18, 2010 Share Posted May 18, 2010 The first video could have been faked, not saying it is. but they shouldent have lit up the van that was trying to get the wounded one away. i could seee how they could have fired at the first group when they appeared to have weapons and their was an squad on the ground. :confused: That was a good source though Fifoo, kodos. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UK47 Posted June 1, 2010 Share Posted June 1, 2010 Personally, I think it's one of the stupidest things I've heard of. Why they throw away the lives of our soldiers instead of just bombing astounds me. We used to do it, and it was pretty effective.Now that's one of the stupidest things I've heard ! they are supposed to help the afghan people, not to exterminate them.And incase you didn't know they are bombing, yes, actually they are.Didn't they already killed enough civilians? and what about thefriendly fire? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now