The_Reaper Posted September 15, 2003 Posted September 15, 2003 i dont know if anyone read the writings by sun tzu. That guy was a genius; the teachings he wrote still aply for today´s warfare. :)
Eltiraaz Posted September 15, 2003 Posted September 15, 2003 classic guerilla warfare - lots of hit & run attacks rather than an open confrontation. Geesh, I would take that approach too if I was in their position. Iraq can't even try to match armies with the US. Sad thing is, I don't think anyone can.. :(
The_Reaper Posted September 15, 2003 Posted September 15, 2003 classic guerilla warfare - lots of hit & run attacks rather than an open confrontation. Geesh, I would take that approach too if I was in their position. Iraq can't even try to match armies with the US. Sad thing is, I don't think anyone can.. :( You forget China!A China vs USA war wouldn´t be very nice and I´m not shure who would win.... :unsure:
Albareth Posted September 15, 2003 Posted September 15, 2003 classic guerilla warfare - lots of hit & run attacks rather than an open confrontation. Geesh, I would take that approach too if I was in their position. Iraq can't even try to match armies with the US. Sad thing is, I don't think anyone can.. :( You forget China!A China vs USA war wouldn´t be very nice and I´m not shure who would win.... :unsure: A China vs USA war would never happen in the modern world, but quite aside from that it would be much like the Soviets against the germans. China would just poor pure mass of soldiers in, chinese outnumber americans 10 to 1, they'd literallly flood you with relatively untrained and unprepared soldiers. It'd be a massacre, no way to know who would win, but the deaths would be endless... Luckily China needs USA and USA needs China, so there is absolutely no chance of either nation even considering that option as matters stand. :)
Rynos Posted September 16, 2003 Posted September 16, 2003 There is no point to Bush being in office. Hes like my little brother declaring war on everything that makes him cry. War really doest solve anything in the long term. I mean we blow them to hell and back then have to pay billions of dollars to "rebuild" their country. IMO we could have gone a different route. In the mean time North Korea has developed nuclear bombs while we were fighting the rag-tag groups of insignifigant morons.
Luminus Posted September 16, 2003 Posted September 16, 2003 Hear hear, that is exactly the way i feel.
Shakkara Posted September 16, 2003 Posted September 16, 2003 There is no point to Bush being in office. Hes like my little brother declaring war on everything that makes him cry. War really doest solve anything in the long term. I mean we blow them to hell and back then have to pay billions of dollars to "rebuild" their country. IMO we could have gone a different route. In the mean time North Korea has developed nuclear bombs while we were fighting the rag-tag groups of insignifigant morons. The US won't rebuild, they will make sure the UN will pay most of it. And the suckers fall for it every time.
Zmid Posted September 16, 2003 Posted September 16, 2003 There is no point to Bush being in office. Hes like my little brother declaring war on everything that makes him cry. War really doest solve anything in the long term. I mean we blow them to hell and back then have to pay billions of dollars to "rebuild" their country. IMO we could have gone a different route. In the mean time North Korea has developed nuclear bombs while we were fighting the rag-tag groups of insignifigant morons.The US won't rebuild, they will make sure the UN will pay most of it. And the suckers fall for it every time. Yeah, he's asking the UN for help after basically slapping them in the face and ignoring them. Personally, I would not blame them in the slightest if they basically turned around to both the US and UK and said 'It's your mess, you clear it up.'
Switch Posted September 16, 2003 Posted September 16, 2003 There is no point to Bush being in office. Hes like my little brother declaring war on everything that makes him cry. War really doest solve anything in the long term. I mean we blow them to hell and back then have to pay billions of dollars to "rebuild" their country. IMO we could have gone a different route. In the mean time North Korea has developed nuclear bombs while we were fighting the rag-tag groups of insignifigant morons.The US won't rebuild, they will make sure the UN will pay most of it. And the suckers fall for it every time. Yeah, he's asking the UN for help after basically slapping them in the face and ignoring them. Personally, I would not blame them in the slightest if they basically turned around to both the US and UK and said 'It's your mess, you clear it up.' lol we're seriously asking the UN to pay for our mess? well the UK is a member, sort of, i guess (tho if we ever fully enroll im emigrating! :P) but thats hilarious.
ThetaOrionis01 Posted September 16, 2003 Posted September 16, 2003 Enrol in what? The UN? The UK is a permanent member of the UN Security Council....which is probably as enrolled as you can get.... Guess you'd better start packing your bags then :lol:
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.