A question for the hardcore fallout 1&2 fans

[Nadin]

So I alone dislike turn-based in all things?

I now understand what people complain about. But isn't this why we have mods?

[LithianLord]

Because FO3 was made for the CoD kids on the consoles with no real attention to any sort of real stat system with a "do anything with no concequence" way of doing everything. FO1-2 are both serious RPing games where your stats and decisions matter. Along with the fact you could really do anything. Choose a slaver? People treat you as such and the entire game "good" factions will attack you. FO3 you just get bad karma. All factions in FO1-2 were neither good nor bad but had real personalities and decisions. FO3 it's Brotherhood=good Enclave=bad. FO3 even just bent the lore over and changed everything to some extent, the worse being the Brotherhood in they make a "we left the others" excuse to make them saints when they were Aholes in FO1-2. Same could be said for the Enclave in that FO1-2 they had some good aspects to them that actually made you question yourself when attacking them.

 

I could go on, but long story short FO3 is an amazing game with endless posibilities with the GECK. It just destroys most of what has made FO1-2 memorable so everyone can play it. Though I say the same for Morrowind to Oblivion. Rubbish game.

[Nadin]

.....I can't argue with that.

Ah, well, back to the SDK.