Heavens Blade Posted June 6, 2006 Posted June 6, 2006 I'm having trouble finding a good video card under $100 that can run oblivion on pc pretty well. anyone got recomendations for a gamer in need :(
Marxist ßastard Posted June 6, 2006 Posted June 6, 2006 ...A vanilla GeForce 6800, or maybe a used Radeon X1600 Pro. The 6800 is cheaper and slightly faster, while the X1600 will let you do HDR+AA.
Ice_Dragon Posted June 7, 2006 Posted June 7, 2006 I am using the GeForce 6600 with 256MB on baord memory. This cost me a hundred and works brilliant.
Marxist ßastard Posted June 7, 2006 Posted June 7, 2006 The 6600GT is around the same price as the vanilla 6800, performs somewhat worse in Oblivion, and has more-or-less zero chance of modification -- if that's what's up your alley.
Heavens Blade Posted June 7, 2006 Author Posted June 7, 2006 umm im looking for one less than a $100. it says on bestbuy.com the a geforce 6600gt costs $200
Marxist ßastard Posted June 9, 2006 Posted June 9, 2006 That's way too much. You're getting ripped off. For comparison, you can get an X1600 Pro -- which was the more expensive of the cards I recommended -- off of NewEgg for $US99, or less if you follow-up on the manufacturer's rebates.
Heavens Blade Posted June 9, 2006 Author Posted June 9, 2006 how come rebates make things cheaper??? also can u return stuff to newegg???
Heavens Blade Posted June 9, 2006 Author Posted June 9, 2006 can a radeon 9800 work almost as well as a geforce 6600??? http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?...N82E16814102669 thats the radeon im thinking of getting
Marxist ßastard Posted June 10, 2006 Posted June 10, 2006 That's a Radeon 9800SE, so no. Absolutely not. Why are you looking at AGP cards, anyways?
mehrunis Posted August 18, 2006 Posted August 18, 2006 That's a Radeon 9800SE, so no. Absolutely not. Why are you looking at AGP cards, anyways?umm....theres pretty much no good graphic (video) cards that'll run oblivion under 100$....there like 200+
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.