Modded FO3 vs New Vegas

[nemanja87]

hey everyone , i know that NV mods are at early stage , but for FO3 they are mostly finished .since NV has added some features that FO3 mods were doing, Im asking for your oppinion, is FO3 completly modded with(FOOK,FWE,marts,mod kits and much more to to add all features from NV) and all DLC's better game at the moment then NV with some of developing mods . i played only vannila FO3 and couple hours of NV .

 

Thanks

[dazzerfong]

Well, thing is, FNV's potential has only at the tip of an iceburg; FO3 is a bit further down the road, but not much. You can't really compare the two like that; FNV's only released for less than 3 months.

[nemanja87]

i personaly think that both vanila games are not so good due to bugs,but when i tried FO3 with fook, marts and fwe i was delighted with gameplay , but since im a bit of mod freak i waited untill perfection and never realy played it :(( , NV came out and i found myself waiting for mods again :P . NV is big step since they included many essencial stuff in vanila , which i like.

 

i found that in FO3 there is like 2-3x of things to do if u stack up only quest mods , it would be shame for all that work to go to waste.

Edited December 1, 2010 by nemanja87

[jjk999]

FO3 was 1) a far richer environment (detailed, dense and atmospheric) 2) had locations which I enjoyed returning to more then the locations in NV 3) WAY more atmosphere 4) better fight experiences (oddly enough many are harder yet they don't FEEL harder for some reason) 5) more enjoyable quests- All that translastes to more replayability. Replayability is important if you are going to install losts of mods and replay that game a lot in the next few years.

 

They better make A LOT of DLCs or I will bypass the next fallout if it's by this team.

 

One mod that would significantly improve this game is a Mart's Mutant Mod