Geofferic Posted October 27, 2015 Share Posted October 27, 2015 Unless the redesign includes not harassing those of us that pay for the site to then pay for each and every damned mod we download, the redesign is a failure. That is the single most obnoxious thing this site does and if another site had the content and didn't harass me for *more money*, then I'd leave immediately. Such bad form. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KunoMochi Posted October 28, 2015 Share Posted October 28, 2015 Geofferic, which mods do you see that are "harassing" you to "pay" to download them? I've only seen donation prompts from mods that the mod author themselves have enabled so you can make direct donations to them if you want to. Nexus Mods do not get a cut from these donations at all and are generally run on ads and memberships. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thandal Posted October 28, 2015 Share Posted October 28, 2015 @Geofferic; No mods, ZERO, absolutely none on the Nexus require any form of payment to download. Standard Membership, and all mods, are 100% free of change. If you see anyone even hinting that they are charging for any of the content hosted here, Report it! Immediately. It will not be tolerated. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Empyrean42 Posted October 28, 2015 Share Posted October 28, 2015 I think what he's saying is that when he downloads mods, he's asked if he wants to send a tip to the mod maker. That's all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Linebarrel33 Posted October 28, 2015 Share Posted October 28, 2015 (edited) In response to post #29807115. #29813455, #29854220, #29860320, #29873390 are all replies on the same post.Arethiel wrote: If it ain't broke, better mess with it. Dark0ne wrote: That sort of thinking is what ensured we moved past the Bronze age/Silver age/Iron age/Dark age/Insert other age of man here.The point isn't to fix, the point is to innovate and improve with modern times, technology and needs.Arethiel wrote: There's nothing that needs to be changed about the site to meet "modern needs" though. Maybe a couple things here and there but an entire site redesign is unwarranted. On top of that, people who have been around awhile may in fact have more difficulty navigating a new site thus frustrating them if the redesign is as "modern" as Windows 8 was. Now maybe the back end of the site needs a redesign due to poor coding or coding that simply was designed with fewer users in mind, but I wouldn't say that it needs to be modernized, probably just fixed (though since I can't see the back end code it's a lot of speculation). I mean, hell, look at C++, that language is old as dirt but it's still the backbone of a lot of back end math engines and is still used quite a bit in the business field. I mean, COBOL is still used by Scott and White Hospital where I live and that came out in the 60s. With all that said, as a professional programmer and amateur web admin I simply don't see the need here to mess with the user interface since code optimizations can generally be done without affecting the UI or the user at all, other then maybe faster site load times, or functions working more consistently. Edit: It is also entirely possible I'll change my mind once we see the new site. DrUlreich wrote: ^thisMy greatest fear is thet they make it all white with the 'flat'' design-trend you see nowadays.Nexusmods' ui is already so cozyreportagain wrote: it is kinda broke though, if you do a quick search you will see how many f*#@ing glitches and bugs there are by doing certain things. especially after/before loging in."That sort of thinking is what ensured we moved past the Bronze age/Silver age/Iron age/Dark age/Insert other age of man here."No offense of course but that's such a faulty/irrelevant comparison :/ He's just worried that the redesign will ultimately be unintuitive and/or more hampering than what the site is now when it ultimately works already at the end of the day. Edited October 28, 2015 by Linebarrel33 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheTokenGeek Posted October 28, 2015 Author Share Posted October 28, 2015 In response to post #29807115. #29813455, #29854220, #29860320, #29873390, #29897050 are all replies on the same post.Arethiel wrote: If it ain't broke, better mess with it. Dark0ne wrote: That sort of thinking is what ensured we moved past the Bronze age/Silver age/Iron age/Dark age/Insert other age of man here.The point isn't to fix, the point is to innovate and improve with modern times, technology and needs.Arethiel wrote: There's nothing that needs to be changed about the site to meet "modern needs" though. Maybe a couple things here and there but an entire site redesign is unwarranted. On top of that, people who have been around awhile may in fact have more difficulty navigating a new site thus frustrating them if the redesign is as "modern" as Windows 8 was. Now maybe the back end of the site needs a redesign due to poor coding or coding that simply was designed with fewer users in mind, but I wouldn't say that it needs to be modernized, probably just fixed (though since I can't see the back end code it's a lot of speculation). I mean, hell, look at C++, that language is old as dirt but it's still the backbone of a lot of back end math engines and is still used quite a bit in the business field. I mean, COBOL is still used by Scott and White Hospital where I live and that came out in the 60s. With all that said, as a professional programmer and amateur web admin I simply don't see the need here to mess with the user interface since code optimizations can generally be done without affecting the UI or the user at all, other then maybe faster site load times, or functions working more consistently. Edit: It is also entirely possible I'll change my mind once we see the new site. DrUlreich wrote: ^thisMy greatest fear is thet they make it all white with the 'flat'' design-trend you see nowadays.Nexusmods' ui is already so cozyreportagain wrote: it is kinda broke though, if you do a quick search you will see how many f*#@ing glitches and bugs there are by doing certain things. especially after/before loging in.Linebarrel33 wrote: "That sort of thinking is what ensured we moved past the Bronze age/Silver age/Iron age/Dark age/Insert other age of man here."No offense of course but that's such a faulty/irrelevant comparison :/ He's just worried that the redesign will ultimately be unintuitive and/or more hampering than what the site is now when it ultimately works already at the end of the day.The thing is, we are a little broken... Did you know that this site was originally coded to fit a 1024x768 screen which back in the day was fine, but with over 90% of our users now using at least a 1680px width screen we look very dated with our content as a strip in the middle of the screen.Did you know that Google now adds weight to sites that are mobile optimised with their latest search algorithm release?Did you know that some of the biggest responses we got on the surveys was that the site doesn't scale, or that we don't use tags very well to find content, that search is under-utilised and broken? We can address all of these and so much more with new web innovations, optimised code and some love and affection put towards a responsive design.The survey results, our analytics and our users tell us a lot...We are and will continue to try our hardest to provide you with a site that will help you find the mods that you are after, be they huge campaigns or little graphical tweaks, additional missions or a complete overhaul. We are working to the ethos of: intuitive, functional, visual.The site will be a long time in development, this is not an overnight project and will be released alongside the current site to enable people to report anything they find and get used to it. I have every faith in our team and users to help us achieve all our goals. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
morpheas768 Posted October 28, 2015 Share Posted October 28, 2015 (edited) Here's the thing: Most people dont like change, especially when it comes to big changes happening fast, and on things that they are well used to/accustomed to.This is why Google/YouTube introduce their little changes one at a time. Of course YT has gone through some major changes in the past, they generally follow this little rule. Now, having said that, I am obliged to say that I hate all sorts of change, and in this case even more, since Nexus has one of the best, coziest, user-friendly UI's I've ever seen.Seriously, visiting your website is a delight, and the ads arent very bad, compared to other sites.The color scheme is great and fits each game nicely, and the buttons for all important functions are clearly visible and good looking. What I'm trying to say is, you dont need a redesign from an UI perspective, but since you are aiming for one, please at least try to keep things looking (visually) similar to what you have right now.And if you are going to introduce major changes to how the sites look, then do them one step at a time, making sure us change-haters sort of ease into it. Thank you. Edited October 28, 2015 by morpheas768 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
morpheas768 Posted October 28, 2015 Share Posted October 28, 2015 (edited) In response to post #29807115. #29813455, #29854220, #29860320, #29873390, #29897050, #29899795 are all replies on the same post.Arethiel wrote: If it ain't broke, better mess with it. Dark0ne wrote: That sort of thinking is what ensured we moved past the Bronze age/Silver age/Iron age/Dark age/Insert other age of man here.The point isn't to fix, the point is to innovate and improve with modern times, technology and needs.Arethiel wrote: There's nothing that needs to be changed about the site to meet "modern needs" though. Maybe a couple things here and there but an entire site redesign is unwarranted. On top of that, people who have been around awhile may in fact have more difficulty navigating a new site thus frustrating them if the redesign is as "modern" as Windows 8 was. Now maybe the back end of the site needs a redesign due to poor coding or coding that simply was designed with fewer users in mind, but I wouldn't say that it needs to be modernized, probably just fixed (though since I can't see the back end code it's a lot of speculation). I mean, hell, look at C++, that language is old as dirt but it's still the backbone of a lot of back end math engines and is still used quite a bit in the business field. I mean, COBOL is still used by Scott and White Hospital where I live and that came out in the 60s. With all that said, as a professional programmer and amateur web admin I simply don't see the need here to mess with the user interface since code optimizations can generally be done without affecting the UI or the user at all, other then maybe faster site load times, or functions working more consistently. Edit: It is also entirely possible I'll change my mind once we see the new site. DrUlreich wrote: ^thisMy greatest fear is thet they make it all white with the 'flat'' design-trend you see nowadays.Nexusmods' ui is already so cozyreportagain wrote: it is kinda broke though, if you do a quick search you will see how many f*#@ing glitches and bugs there are by doing certain things. especially after/before loging in.Linebarrel33 wrote: "That sort of thinking is what ensured we moved past the Bronze age/Silver age/Iron age/Dark age/Insert other age of man here."No offense of course but that's such a faulty/irrelevant comparison :/ He's just worried that the redesign will ultimately be unintuitive and/or more hampering than what the site is now when it ultimately works already at the end of the day.BlindJudge wrote: The thing is, we are a little broken... Did you know that this site was originally coded to fit a 1024x768 screen which back in the day was fine, but with over 90% of our users now using at least a 1680px width screen we look very dated with our content as a strip in the middle of the screen.Did you know that Google now adds weight to sites that are mobile optimised with their latest search algorithm release?Did you know that some of the biggest responses we got on the surveys was that the site doesn't scale, or that we don't use tags very well to find content, that search is under-utilised and broken? We can address all of these and so much more with new web innovations, optimised code and some love and affection put towards a responsive design.The survey results, our analytics and our users tell us a lot...We are and will continue to try our hardest to provide you with a site that will help you find the mods that you are after, be they huge campaigns or little graphical tweaks, additional missions or a complete overhaul. We are working to the ethos of: intuitive, functional, visual.The site will be a long time in development, this is not an overnight project and will be released alongside the current site to enable people to report anything they find and get used to it. I have every faith in our team and users to help us achieve all our goals.@Dark0ne:Yes, because advancing through entire civilizations and technologies = the same as a web-redesign of a site. /sarcasmThis little phrase of the Ages can be used to justify any sort of change, be it small or massive.But in any case, this analogy of yours is very very poor. Mostly because the "innovations" that you are implying are not true innovations, its things that have already been done by other websites, and the technology that you mentioned is already tried and tested.Also, the Dark Ages were horrible times that humanity wishes it never happened since it brought us back in the past, for a while, it did not move us forward.P.S. Not trying to bash on you guys, its just that this analogy is very poor indeed. Edited October 28, 2015 by morpheas768 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Halleytes3 Posted October 28, 2015 Share Posted October 28, 2015 In response to post #29807115. #29813455, #29854220, #29860320, #29873390, #29897050, #29899795, #29908335 are all replies on the same post.Arethiel wrote: If it ain't broke, better mess with it. Dark0ne wrote: That sort of thinking is what ensured we moved past the Bronze age/Silver age/Iron age/Dark age/Insert other age of man here.The point isn't to fix, the point is to innovate and improve with modern times, technology and needs.Arethiel wrote: There's nothing that needs to be changed about the site to meet "modern needs" though. Maybe a couple things here and there but an entire site redesign is unwarranted. On top of that, people who have been around awhile may in fact have more difficulty navigating a new site thus frustrating them if the redesign is as "modern" as Windows 8 was. Now maybe the back end of the site needs a redesign due to poor coding or coding that simply was designed with fewer users in mind, but I wouldn't say that it needs to be modernized, probably just fixed (though since I can't see the back end code it's a lot of speculation). I mean, hell, look at C++, that language is old as dirt but it's still the backbone of a lot of back end math engines and is still used quite a bit in the business field. I mean, COBOL is still used by Scott and White Hospital where I live and that came out in the 60s. With all that said, as a professional programmer and amateur web admin I simply don't see the need here to mess with the user interface since code optimizations can generally be done without affecting the UI or the user at all, other then maybe faster site load times, or functions working more consistently. Edit: It is also entirely possible I'll change my mind once we see the new site. DrUlreich wrote: ^thisMy greatest fear is thet they make it all white with the 'flat'' design-trend you see nowadays.Nexusmods' ui is already so cozyreportagain wrote: it is kinda broke though, if you do a quick search you will see how many f*#@ing glitches and bugs there are by doing certain things. especially after/before loging in.Linebarrel33 wrote: "That sort of thinking is what ensured we moved past the Bronze age/Silver age/Iron age/Dark age/Insert other age of man here."No offense of course but that's such a faulty/irrelevant comparison :/ He's just worried that the redesign will ultimately be unintuitive and/or more hampering than what the site is now when it ultimately works already at the end of the day.BlindJudge wrote: The thing is, we are a little broken... Did you know that this site was originally coded to fit a 1024x768 screen which back in the day was fine, but with over 90% of our users now using at least a 1680px width screen we look very dated with our content as a strip in the middle of the screen.Did you know that Google now adds weight to sites that are mobile optimised with their latest search algorithm release?Did you know that some of the biggest responses we got on the surveys was that the site doesn't scale, or that we don't use tags very well to find content, that search is under-utilised and broken? We can address all of these and so much more with new web innovations, optimised code and some love and affection put towards a responsive design.The survey results, our analytics and our users tell us a lot...We are and will continue to try our hardest to provide you with a site that will help you find the mods that you are after, be they huge campaigns or little graphical tweaks, additional missions or a complete overhaul. We are working to the ethos of: intuitive, functional, visual.The site will be a long time in development, this is not an overnight project and will be released alongside the current site to enable people to report anything they find and get used to it. I have every faith in our team and users to help us achieve all our goals.morpheas768 wrote: @Dark0ne:Yes, because advancing through entire civilizations and technologies = the same as a web-redesign of a site. /sarcasmThis little phrase of the Ages can be used to justify any sort of change, be it small or massive.But in any case, this analogy of yours is very very poor. Mostly because the "innovations" that you are implying are not true innovations, its things that have already been done by other websites, and the technology that you mentioned is already tried and tested.Also, the Dark Ages were horrible times that humanity wishes it never happened since it brought us back in the past, for a while, it did not move us forward.P.S. Not trying to bash on you guys, its just that this analogy is very poor indeed.The site as it is now is pretty ugly. There's a lot of unused space, it's slow to navigate (it could be a lot better), changing pages is glitching, whenever I load the next page it doesn't scroll me back up, the menus are ugly, the font family is bad, a Calibri or a Helvetica, or a Gibson or Lucida Sans would be a lot nicer. Anyway, this Trebuchet MS has to be changed. The navbar is outdated too, and I think that the space could be used a lot more efficiently. And to finish it, the website is heavy. A lot. I don't know if it's the server-side's fault, but I think it needs better writing anyway. And as he said, renovate to meet modern times it's not the looks only, but the structure as well. WebDesign has evolved, HTML5 and CSS3 is here and it's always improving, JavaScript is a lot more powerful too. The new tools are here but aren't being used. Why is that important? Cause it can make everything faster and prettier. So yes, I does need a complete redesign. Regarding Windows 8. The problem never was that it's hard to use, but that it was different. Elder people who never used any of system for a long time always found Win8+ easier to use. It seemed "hard" to old win7 users cause they pretty much lived in that, and then they got something different. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dark0ne Posted October 28, 2015 Share Posted October 28, 2015 In response to post #29807115. #29813455, #29854220, #29860320, #29873390, #29897050, #29899795, #29908335, #29908425 are all replies on the same post.Arethiel wrote: If it ain't broke, better mess with it. Dark0ne wrote: That sort of thinking is what ensured we moved past the Bronze age/Silver age/Iron age/Dark age/Insert other age of man here.The point isn't to fix, the point is to innovate and improve with modern times, technology and needs.Arethiel wrote: There's nothing that needs to be changed about the site to meet "modern needs" though. Maybe a couple things here and there but an entire site redesign is unwarranted. On top of that, people who have been around awhile may in fact have more difficulty navigating a new site thus frustrating them if the redesign is as "modern" as Windows 8 was. Now maybe the back end of the site needs a redesign due to poor coding or coding that simply was designed with fewer users in mind, but I wouldn't say that it needs to be modernized, probably just fixed (though since I can't see the back end code it's a lot of speculation). I mean, hell, look at C++, that language is old as dirt but it's still the backbone of a lot of back end math engines and is still used quite a bit in the business field. I mean, COBOL is still used by Scott and White Hospital where I live and that came out in the 60s. With all that said, as a professional programmer and amateur web admin I simply don't see the need here to mess with the user interface since code optimizations can generally be done without affecting the UI or the user at all, other then maybe faster site load times, or functions working more consistently. Edit: It is also entirely possible I'll change my mind once we see the new site. DrUlreich wrote: ^thisMy greatest fear is thet they make it all white with the 'flat'' design-trend you see nowadays.Nexusmods' ui is already so cozyreportagain wrote: it is kinda broke though, if you do a quick search you will see how many f*#@ing glitches and bugs there are by doing certain things. especially after/before loging in.Linebarrel33 wrote: "That sort of thinking is what ensured we moved past the Bronze age/Silver age/Iron age/Dark age/Insert other age of man here."No offense of course but that's such a faulty/irrelevant comparison :/ He's just worried that the redesign will ultimately be unintuitive and/or more hampering than what the site is now when it ultimately works already at the end of the day.BlindJudge wrote: The thing is, we are a little broken... Did you know that this site was originally coded to fit a 1024x768 screen which back in the day was fine, but with over 90% of our users now using at least a 1680px width screen we look very dated with our content as a strip in the middle of the screen.Did you know that Google now adds weight to sites that are mobile optimised with their latest search algorithm release?Did you know that some of the biggest responses we got on the surveys was that the site doesn't scale, or that we don't use tags very well to find content, that search is under-utilised and broken? We can address all of these and so much more with new web innovations, optimised code and some love and affection put towards a responsive design.The survey results, our analytics and our users tell us a lot...We are and will continue to try our hardest to provide you with a site that will help you find the mods that you are after, be they huge campaigns or little graphical tweaks, additional missions or a complete overhaul. We are working to the ethos of: intuitive, functional, visual.The site will be a long time in development, this is not an overnight project and will be released alongside the current site to enable people to report anything they find and get used to it. I have every faith in our team and users to help us achieve all our goals.morpheas768 wrote: @Dark0ne:Yes, because advancing through entire civilizations and technologies = the same as a web-redesign of a site. /sarcasmThis little phrase of the Ages can be used to justify any sort of change, be it small or massive.But in any case, this analogy of yours is very very poor. Mostly because the "innovations" that you are implying are not true innovations, its things that have already been done by other websites, and the technology that you mentioned is already tried and tested.Also, the Dark Ages were horrible times that humanity wishes it never happened since it brought us back in the past, for a while, it did not move us forward.P.S. Not trying to bash on you guys, its just that this analogy is very poor indeed.Halleytes3 wrote: The site as it is now is pretty ugly. There's a lot of unused space, it's slow to navigate (it could be a lot better), changing pages is glitching, whenever I load the next page it doesn't scroll me back up, the menus are ugly, the font family is bad, a Calibri or a Helvetica, or a Gibson or Lucida Sans would be a lot nicer. Anyway, this Trebuchet MS has to be changed. The navbar is outdated too, and I think that the space could be used a lot more efficiently. And to finish it, the website is heavy. A lot. I don't know if it's the server-side's fault, but I think it needs better writing anyway. And as he said, renovate to meet modern times it's not the looks only, but the structure as well. WebDesign has evolved, HTML5 and CSS3 is here and it's always improving, JavaScript is a lot more powerful too. The new tools are here but aren't being used. Why is that important? Cause it can make everything faster and prettier. So yes, I does need a complete redesign. Regarding Windows 8. The problem never was that it's hard to use, but that it was different. Elder people who never used any of system for a long time always found Win8+ easier to use. It seemed "hard" to old win7 users cause they pretty much lived in that, and then they got something different. The analogy was simply making the point that if we just remained content with the status quo and how things were, without evening thinking to improve, we'd be no where. It wasn't particularly hard, though I have enjoyed the pedantic responses to a simple analogy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now