Marcus Wolfe Posted May 14, 2007 Share Posted May 14, 2007 Same here man.I have a sword in my room. And a knife. They are just there for looking cool. But I guess, if under attack or threatened, I would use them. Get swords because you want to hang them on your wall.DON'T Get swords because you want to kill peopleBut kill people with swords if it's your life or theirs. Unless, of course, it is possible to take down the threat without killing them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thejake1453 Posted May 14, 2007 Share Posted May 14, 2007 man whats wrong with owning a sword? it could be one of those ones that are purely decrotive, the ones that are stuck to the board. and with this kid being arested for making a map with his school in it is bull crap!! just about every bloody school would be perfect for a defensive stronghold (i dont mean strength of walls, more like stratigic posisions)i'm sick and tired of people always blaming games for stuff, or parents getting mad and sueing game copanies for making voilent games because they thought that there little 5 yr old will get ideas from it, well heres a simple solution: DONT LET YOU KIDS PLAY IT!!! theres a reason they are rated MA and have high level vilance written on them, well its because its for 15yr olds, who can tell the difference between fantasy and reality, are allowed to play them, not some 5 yr old, TO THE PARENTS WHO MAY BR READING THIS: DONT LET YOUR LITTLE 5YR OLD PLA A GAME THATS MA BECAUSE ITS VILENT!!!!!!!!!!!my mother doesnt care if i play vilent games because she knows that i wont go nuts and kill a bunch off people, and why would i kill a bunch off people if i cant even spell vilence? its fun to kill in games but in real life you know that its wrong. on a second note, how long do you think before this topic is locked because its gone waaaaaay off topic.which is probably vagrants folt for being a jerk in the first place Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginji Posted May 14, 2007 Share Posted May 14, 2007 on a second note, how long do you think before this topic is locked because its gone waaaaaay off topic.which is probably vagrants folt for being a jerk in the first placeOr mine for putting that link in the first place. I agree with what you said though, even if you spelt most of it wrong and in bold.Games are the Scapegoat for all of lifes little problems (Crazed teenagers on murderous rampages), it's like blaming fast food chains for obese people, it isn't the fast food chains fault that some people are obese, but they are the ones held resposeable i.e. 43oz man Pete Burns is suing McDonalds for his obesity (not real). In actual fact it is Pete's fault that he is fat, sorry, obese, but he is saying that they should have told him to stop, or have refused him service. Why should they, it's you own resposeabilty what you do to your body, just like it is your responseabilty if you go on a murderous rampage. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thejake1453 Posted May 15, 2007 Share Posted May 15, 2007 eyah some one who agrees! on a second note, how long do you think before this topic is locked because its gone waaaaaay off topic.which is probably vagrants folt for being a jerk in the first placeit's like blaming fast food chains for obese people, it isn't the fast food chains fault that some people are obese, but they are the ones held resposeable i.e. 43oz man Pete Burns is suing McDonalds for his obesity (not real). In actual fact it is Pete's fault that he is fat, sorry, obese, but he is saying that they should have told him to stop, or have refused him service. Why should they, it's you own resposeabilty what you do to actually i wouldnt be surprised if someone is sueng mackas for themself being obese. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.