ThomasCovenant Posted February 9, 2008 Share Posted February 9, 2008 I can play Oblivion w/ a lot of maxed out textures and only a little clipping in the intro fly-by movie.Is my card rated as... Good, bad, or ugly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheTerminator2004 Posted February 9, 2008 Share Posted February 9, 2008 Not a bad card, definitely, though definitely not the best. Really you need a PCI-E one to take full advantage of it though - AGP just isn't good enough any more these days for gaming. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ResidentWeevil2077 Posted February 11, 2008 Share Posted February 11, 2008 It's not good, but it's not bad. Keep in mind that ATI cards are "media-oriented", whereas NVIDIA's cards are "game-oriented". I personally like using ATI myself (got my HD 2600 XT last week), but I've been told numerous times before that NVIDIA's are better. While that might be the case, ATI's do much more than just play games. Why do you think Microsoft and Nintendo have custom ATI graphics chips inside the Xbox 360 and Wii respectively? And here's something I'm willing to argue with anyone over - ATI's cards are NOT more expensive than NVIDIA's. If anything, it's the other way around. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheTerminator2004 Posted February 11, 2008 Share Posted February 11, 2008 No, ATI don't make bad cards, not by any stretch of the imagination. They are not, however, nearly as good for running games as Nvidia. So, if you mostly use your PC for games, go with an nvidia card, and if you use it for a lot of other media-type stuff, then ATI may be better. Their latest cards are generally more expensive than nvidia's latest cards, however. The 8500GT, for example, is about £180, whereas I've seen the ATI equivalent going for around £240. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ResidentWeevil2077 Posted February 11, 2008 Share Posted February 11, 2008 The HD 3870 X2 is apparently running for ~$500 CDN, while it's yet-to-be-released counterpart (the GeForce 9800 GX2) is speculated to carry a price of ~$450 USD. I'm comparing equivalent cards, and since $CDN and $USD aren't the same equivalency (despite the Canadian Loonie being on par w/ the US Greenback), I take it the GeForce 9800 GX2 would either meet or exceed the HD 3870 X2 in terms of cost. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheTerminator2004 Posted February 12, 2008 Share Posted February 12, 2008 I'm assuming by CDN, you meant Canada dollars, CAD, as I couldn't find any mention of CDN at all. If so, then, the HD 3870 X2 is: 255.546 GBP1 CAD = 0.511092 GBP 1 GBP = 1.95659 CAD and the GeForce 9800 GX2 is: 230.863 GBP1 USD = 0.513030 GBP 1 GBP = 1.94921 USD Proof that nvidia cards tend to be cheaper than ATI's, especially when you consider that the 9800 GX2 is more powerful than the HD 3870 X2. I believe the 8800 Ultra is more powerful, and probably even cheaper. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jumonji Posted February 12, 2008 Share Posted February 12, 2008 When comparing cards, remember to include overclocking and drivers. The first thing I do with my ATI cards is instll 3rd party omega drivers, which are rock-solid stable and have excellent overclocking support. I don't know if the latest generation of NVidia are 2% faster and 3% cheaper out of the box, or whatever. But I definitely love my omega drivers and the card does whatever I want it to with no glitches. Of course it depends on your motherboard. ATI seems to work better with AMD, and the 1950x with my dual-core AMD 4800 works fantastic. No complaints whatsoever. -Jumonji Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ResidentWeevil2077 Posted February 12, 2008 Share Posted February 12, 2008 @ Terminator: Yes, I meant to put CAD, not CDN (thanks for correcting me). But I still hold firmly that NVIDIA's cards are not better. Nope. I don't care how many times you prove me wrong with facts, because I've got a noggin made of carbon steel. Nothing you can say or do will ever sway my opinion. @ Jumonji: Since AMD acquired ATI last year, I've been keeping tabs on the new combined CPU/GPU architecture. It definitely will make things easier to package. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ethre Posted February 12, 2008 Share Posted February 12, 2008 ATI has ported their latest graphic cards to AGP. I installed one a couple months ago (x1950) Their LATEST AGP flavor offering 3850 AGP 512 (Powercooler) Sapphire also has one, but I don't know the link. Of course, if anyone has one of these they want to lend out, I'd be happy to run some benchmarks comparing it w/ my 3850 PCI-e version. (Asrock Dual Sata user here). With regard to the 38xx series cards though, all I can say is that for the price I could not be more pleased. I've even take a temporary (well, now close to 3 week) break from modding because of the ingame beauty. Oh man, talking to an addict here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zanatoz Posted February 16, 2008 Share Posted February 16, 2008 Truth is,at least last time i saw a true test of both ati and nvidia's best(at the time),that both nvidia or ati,do one thing better than the other, one ran better at higher resolutions...etc. The one thing that is of note is that nvidia is said to be the go to card on the linux platform,they are said to just work better...though not much available gaming in linux to test those claims.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.