simondent2 Posted November 1, 2016 Share Posted November 1, 2016 Just had my first CTD . The old black screen ctd .Played SE for quite a few hour dont see nothing special about it except it looks a bit pretty . Can play Skyrim same amout of time with over hundred mods, no CTD .Points I did find better .Horse's dont mess up or get stuck on them .Dexion . Vampire feeding has been fixed I installed every Bethesda mod . Feeding still works .Did not have any load screen problemsPoints i did not like .Save's in documents when deleted do not delete on Bethesda .Run new gave save's corrupt .game will not load .Trees static no movement hdt .Grass ok .Why has Bethsda allowed bug fixing by Nexus modder's ? Why did they not fix the bugs them selves yet they seem to have turned their backs on modders . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SPH1 Posted November 1, 2016 Share Posted November 1, 2016 Syrim SE is far and away better than the original, even modded. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deleted3897072User Posted November 1, 2016 Share Posted November 1, 2016 SSE has its own forum now: https://forums.nexusmods.com/index.php?c=4040,4045 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SPH1 Posted November 2, 2016 Share Posted November 2, 2016 SSE has its own forum now: https://forums.nexusmods.com/index.php?c=4040,4045 Thanks! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TeofaTsavo Posted November 2, 2016 Share Posted November 2, 2016 Syrim SE is far and away better than the original, even modded.Thanks for that deep assessment, Maiq. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
woodsman30 Posted November 2, 2016 Share Posted November 2, 2016 Syrim SE is far and away better than the original, even modded.I think not perhaps we are talking about a different game? I can run SSE no problems I however find it lacking and not better than my modded skyrim it is not even close so unless you have some secret game SSE has a long way to go before it is better than a modded Skyrim sorry. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SPH1 Posted November 2, 2016 Share Posted November 2, 2016 (edited) Well, since we have TWO Skyrims now and can play either as the separate games they are, looking at my original with Vividian ENB and Vivid Weathers it just seems kind of cheesy or even cartoonish compared with SE, which seems to me to have much more gravitas. I thought the original great, even when using the outstanding RCRN and before that COT, as well as dabbling/testing lighting such as RLO and ELFX. Although great none compare with SE. Now, granted, I never went the full ENB thing so yea, perhaps SE doesn't compete - yet - with the top of the line ENB's and PC's. I'm only using a self-built budget AMD APU A8-7600 build...that's no dedicated graphics card, chip only. And I think the game(s) play great. With SE better. My little "chip" is playing SE with Open Cities, Frostfall/Camping, Wet & Cold and iNeed without a hiccup, as it did with the original. I've posted some screen shots involving pertinent topics here and at Bethesda. The original game is obsolete; SE is the present AND future. And we don't need mods "ported" over to SE. We need a new generation specifically for the greater potential of SE. So, in what way are your heavily modded originals far superior to SE? Are we speaking of graphics/look? Or just the amount of mods available? (Note: many mods are essentially junk mods that did not really have to have been made...my opinion, of course.) With your heavily modded games you obviously have the DLC's and got SE for free. Have you actually been playing it, or just going on reviews? How is SE lacking? Edited November 2, 2016 by SPH1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SPH1 Posted November 2, 2016 Share Posted November 2, 2016 (edited) Here's an example of SE's apparent superiority. I sort of adopted the Saxon Norman Fort mod. I installed it on SE to see what would happen (along with my Rorikstead Farmhouse mod). Both worked. But regarding the Saxon Norman Fort, in the original my little PC would often take a performance hit when riding up the steps to the gate (perhaps due to the fort's NPC guards and attacking bandit spawns that come with the mod.) But for the brief time I tested it on SE I ran up the steps with no problem. Now I want to try the notorious original Castle Strunmah (still the best looking house in the game), of which I tweaked in a mod. Basically everyone got a performance hit in the original game. I wonder how (or if) it plays in SE. BTW, although the Saxon Norman Fort looked even more beautiful in SE not everything was perfect, as some of the mods NPC's had black-face, apparently lacking a texture. I guess that is where the porting comes in. Then again, perhaps the apparent performance superiority of SE was all just my imagination with regard to the fort. Edited November 2, 2016 by SPH1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TeofaTsavo Posted November 2, 2016 Share Posted November 2, 2016 So, in what way are your heavily modded originals far superior to SE? Are we speaking of graphics/look? Or just the amount of mods available? (Note: many mods are essentially junk mods that did not really have to have been made...my opinion, of course.) With your heavily modded games you obviously have the DLC's and got SE for free. Have you actually been playing it, or just going on reviews? How is SE lacking? Pretty cut and dried. My modded original game runs very well. SSE won't even load. For me the "far superior" game is the one that is actually playable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phantompally76 Posted November 2, 2016 Share Posted November 2, 2016 Agreed. I don't care how "stable" the SSE is at 15 frames per second. I'll take "unstable" Oldrim at 60+ fps any day. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts