Drivejunky95 Posted December 5, 2016 Posted December 5, 2016 Skyrim SE vanilla is capping at just under the 3GB of VRAM my R9 290x has. Was wondering what kind of numbers you guys were getting with a moderately to high modded game - i.e a good amount of visual mods on the higher end of the spectrum.
L3s7ing Posted December 5, 2016 Posted December 5, 2016 (edited) Around 4,5 to 5 GB with 2560x1440 resolution, modified re-engaged reshade+enb, 2k-4k textures and some ini changes.Edit: 4,5 was the real peak. 5 GB only occurred when I tried downsampling... Edited December 5, 2016 by L3s7ing
goranpaa Posted December 5, 2016 Posted December 5, 2016 (edited) Hi I get max 3.424 gb VRAM in the autumn forest in the Rift. 1K - 2K texture mods. No reshade or Enb. This on high settings, TAA and only 64 bit rendering target on + God rays off in the launcher. The card : Sapphire Nitro R9 380 4gb. 1080 p monitor. Edited December 5, 2016 by goranpaa
jones177 Posted December 6, 2016 Posted December 6, 2016 Hi 4.8gbs vram near Old Hroldan Inn is the highest so for. 4.3gbs is my average on a vanilla game at 4k resolution & reshade. Later
DarkStuff666 Posted December 6, 2016 Posted December 6, 2016 I am at the limit of my VRAM, spending 6GB on my GF 980TI using quite a lot of mods. The games still runs at 60fps and I am using DSR to play the game at 2880x1800I do not experience crashes at all. :smile: Mods I am using and load order: https://www.dropbox.com/s/a923kd39vx2fxqx/Mods.rtf?dl=0Not sure where it starts swapping to when I am using all my VRAM, but nothing is slowing down it seems.
Drivejunky95 Posted December 7, 2016 Author Posted December 7, 2016 Thanks for the replies guys, a wide variety of info here :laugh: I hope this can be used for others determining GPU requirements for a modded Skyrim!
Aminados Posted December 9, 2016 Posted December 9, 2016 (edited) I am over 3gb (or should be) I need a new graphics card. Edited December 11, 2016 by Aminados
Lisselli Posted December 9, 2016 Posted December 9, 2016 Just under 1.5gb because I know what my eyes are capable of handling.
L3s7ing Posted December 9, 2016 Posted December 9, 2016 Just under 1.5gb because I know what my eyes are capable of handling.Someone referring to the fact the human eye could only see a specific amount of fps?
Lisselli Posted December 9, 2016 Posted December 9, 2016 (edited) Just under 1.5gb because I know what my eyes are capable of handling.Someone referring to the fact the human eye could only see a specific amount of fps? Correct. Well, I have long accepted that people aren't satisfied with anything lower than 60 and try going beyond that. I don't notice a difference between 60 and 120, but I notice a difference between 30 and 60. And I run at 30fps(not really intentional but its a limitation of my laptop). And my eyes are just.. yeah they can't hack it like they used to, so I don't try prettying up my game too much :/ I had a desktop that ran Skyrim Original at 60 constant, but never used no more than 1k according to the performance monitor. TLDR; I stick with bare bones vanilla graphics. Edited December 9, 2016 by Lisselli
Recommended Posts