Sequels we'd like to see

[Marcus Wolfe]

Read title.

 

Age of Mythology II

No joke. We had a whole topic about this one. Link

 

Age of Empires IV

Now, I know they just came out with Age of Empires III The Asian Dynasties Expansion pack, but I think it's the last expansion pack they're coming out with, and in all of the RTS I have played, I have not yet fought on Australian soil. I figure that in the next one they're going to make, there will be nowhere in the world you can't fight.

 

TESV

Do I have to say more? No, no I don't.

 

God of War III

I know they're goign to make another one, great things almost always come in threes!

 

WOW II

On second thought, no.

[Deleted379299User]

WOW II

On second thought, no.

 

rofl

 

 

There are 5 games that stand out to me as needing sequels.

 

Giants: Citizen Kabuto

Dreamfall: The Longest Journey

Beyond Good & Evil

Psychonauts

Advent Rising

 

Yes not all of these are pc games but, i just went ahead and listed those that stood out :)

[Marcus Wolfe]

Advent Rising?

 

Never got past the crazy bald goddess god on that game.

 

Advent Rising is something I think should be 'reimagined'. It has basically the worst plot ever, but some of the gameplay features were nice. It doesn't need a sequel, it needs to have it's gameplay put in another game with good plot and graphics.

 

Then again, who knows? Perhaps an Advent Rising sequel would be awesome.

 

Another thought:

 

How many sequels can a game have before you're basically playing the same game over and over again?

[Deleted379299User]

How many sequels can a game have before you're basically playing the same game over and over again?

 

3 is the absolute maximum for sequels of anything. Movies, Games whatever.. After that its just going to get boring and let you down.

 

 

As for advent rising, bald goddess? lol you sure you got the right game man :)

 

Advent Rising was an awesome game imho, im actually friends with one of the guys who did alot of the cenimatic work.

[doomjockey]

How many sequels can a game have before you're basically playing the same game over and over again?

 

3 is the absolute maximum for sequels of anything. Movies, Games whatever.. After that its just going to get boring and let you down.

 

Mostly true unless we're talking books. Series literature can go for a long time.

 

My sequels:

 

-Planescape: Torment- or anything that makes use of the Planescape setting really

-Xenogears- Xenosaga didn't count since it was created by different developers

-Vagrant Story-

-Baldur's Gate: Dark Alliance- pretty bad, but the ridiculous plot screams for more. they went from beholders to vampires to pharohs... we need more if only for the sake of comedy!

-Baldur's Gate series- this CRPG was great, could use some revitalization

 

I could go for another Warcraft as long as they reverted back to strategy.

[ninja_lord666]

There are 5 games that stand out to me as needing sequels.

...

Psychonauts

...

YEAH!

 

I'd like to see another Neverwinter Nights (as long as BioWare makes it and not the terrible Obsidian). Icewind Dale III would be another game I'd want to play (I won't play it if they still have 3rd Edition rules, though; they need to update to 3.5). Baldur's Gate III would be sweet, too (again, 3.5 is needed. I'm not sure if Baldur's Gate has 1st Edition or 2nd Edition rules, but 3.5 is much better).

 

As for games that are coming out, and actually have more than a snowball's chance in hell of being made, the only sequel I'm looking forward to (aside from the obvious TES V), is Soul Calibur IV. I'm totally going to own everyone with Vader! :devil:

 

Edit:

3 is the absolute maximum for sequels of anything.

What about The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy, the only trilogy with five books? ;)

[doomjockey]

As for games that are coming out, and actually have more than a snowball's chance in hell of being made, the only sequel I'm looking forward to (aside from the obvious TES V), is Soul Calibur IV. I'm totally going to own everyone with Vader! :devil:

 

 

Back up a minute, you can't mean Darth Vader, can you?

 

 

 

 

Oh. My. God.

 

You do.

 

*flush*

 

Did you hear that? That was my respect for Soul Calibur swirling round the toilet.

[ninja_lord666]

As for games that are coming out, and actually have more than a snowball's chance in hell of being made, the only sequel I'm looking forward to (aside from the obvious TES V), is Soul Calibur IV. I'm totally going to own everyone with Vader! :devil:

 

 

Back up a minute, you can't mean Darth Vader, can you?

 

 

 

 

Oh. My. God.

 

You do.

 

*flush*

 

Did you hear that? That was my respect for Soul Calibur swirling round the toilet.

Yes, Yoda and Darth Vader are playable characters. Is there something wrong with that?

[doomjockey]

As for games that are coming out, and actually have more than a snowball's chance in hell of being made, the only sequel I'm looking forward to (aside from the obvious TES V), is Soul Calibur IV. I'm totally going to own everyone with Vader! :devil:

 

 

Back up a minute, you can't mean Darth Vader, can you?

 

 

 

 

Oh. My. God.

 

You do.

 

*flush*

 

Did you hear that? That was my respect for Soul Calibur swirling round the toilet.

Yes, Yoda and Darth Vader are playable characters. Is there something wrong with that?

 

Keen eye you've got.

 

Yes, something's wrong with that. I'd hoped Namco could continue this great series without adding more licensed characters. III seemed to make some progress with 3 new original characters, but perhaps it didn't sell well enough to keep up the trend. Now we get Star Wars crossing into the latest sequel to boost profits. It's a new low.

 

Why not just throw Lara Croft, Superman, and Harry Potter into the mix. :confused:

[ninja_lord666]

Why not just throw Lara Croft, Superman, and Harry Potter into the mix. :confused:

Well, Laura Croft has guns, not swords, [pre-Crisis] Superman is almost invincible (though, post-Crisis Superman is still pretty good), and Harry Potter just sucks.