Landsknecht Posted November 25, 2008 Author Share Posted November 25, 2008 Seriously, back on track: there's a twist! It turns out that Senator Clinton is constitutionally not eligible for the job. Article 1 Section 6 says you can not occupy a post that you previously voted to give a pay raise, but this has happened before so who knows, she could take the pay cut. Or they could just decide they don't care, which is what happened the previous 5 or 6 times this has been an issue. Very interesting. Of course, the Constitution has not stopped Democrats (or Republicans) from doing whatever they want in recent history. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michlo Posted November 26, 2008 Share Posted November 26, 2008 Michlo, what's the matter with you? How can you not see that a hummer from a starstruck fat chick is WAY worse than:Invading the wrong countryGiving corrupt mercenaries free reign to rape, murder and pillage while ensuring they are immune to the lawSending thousands of servicemen to their deaths to find the guy that hurt daddy's egoRigging contracts that ensure your rich billionaire friends get richer by building barracks that electrocute soldiers to death when they try to showerOutlawing the best body armor ever invented just because the guy who makes it is not your friend so he won't give you the money he makesStanding by doing absolutely nothing while thousands of civilians starve to death in one of our own greatest cities after it was nearly washed off the map. (and the list goes on and on and on and...) I mean seriously, Michlo, he got a hummer, don't you realize how lucky we are to have survived through that? Seriously, back on track: there's a twist! It turns out that Senator Clinton is constitutionally not eligible for the job. Article 1 Section 6 says you can not occupy a post that you previously voted to give a pay raise, but this has happened before so who knows, she could take the pay cut. Or they could just decide they don't care, which is what happened the previous 5 or 6 times this has been an issue. Drat, you're right, mate, sorry about that. I ought to pay more attention to what "she who is no longer talking to me (what a loss) says". I mean, none of the tragedies of the last eight years can compare to the horror of the surplus, the lowest deficit and unemployment rates in recent memory such as we had from those blighters, the Clintons. *sigh* Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
arannya Posted December 10, 2008 Share Posted December 10, 2008 I think Obama should've given this job to Chuck Hagel or Richard Lugar because I get a feeling that Hillary will do something that will seriously embarrass the Obama cabinet before the end of his first term and "resign". Then she'll make a public statement denouncing Obama and attack him on his character. Then I believe she will try to gather sympathy as someone who has been wronged by "The Man"(the government) and try to sensationalize trivial matters to paint Obama as a "Democrat Bush". She'll likely use that to her favour in the 2012 Democratic Primary. She's a treacherous female dog, methinks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michlo Posted December 11, 2008 Share Posted December 11, 2008 I think Obama should've given this job to Chuck Hagel or Richard Lugar because I get a feeling that Hillary will do something that will seriously embarrass the Obama cabinet before the end of his first term and "resign". Then she'll make a public statement denouncing Obama and attack him on his character. Then I believe she will try to gather sympathy as someone who has been wronged by "The Man"(the government) and try to sensationalize trivial matters to paint Obama as a "Democrat Bush". She'll likely use that to her favour in the 2012 Democratic Primary. She's a treacherous female dog, methinks. Sorry but that's ridiculous. She would be made to look a fool and a rather unpatriotic one. She is neither. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
billypnats Posted December 11, 2008 Share Posted December 11, 2008 Has anyone else noticed that there's a lot of premium users in this thread? oh well, why is it so bad for her to be secretary of state? She should not be an exact reflection of her husband (hopefully not)All women like beauty, so why judge her? (I think shes pretty for her age) And beside, who would you rather to be secretary of state? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.