In response to post #54660448. #54660493, #54661078, #54661098, #54662668, #54662753, #54662853, #54663293, #54663353, #54663538, #54663713, #54664098, #54664203, #54664293, #54664338, #54665443, #54666088, #54666353, #54667113, #54667333, #54668338 are all replies on the same post. i agree with this. it's a step in the right direction, but it'd be better if it were more compact and zoomed-out. variance in the font sizes is desperately needed. the page looks very 'muddy' as my eye is not drawn to one particular element, and it takes scanning to find what i need.
