Lunanella

In response to post #64250831. #64251881 is also a reply to the same post. I prefer to manage mods by myself, as in manually. The micromanagement makes me feel more confident about the in-game results and everything seems to work better that way (I've been modding Skyrim since 2011, using both BOSS and LOOT - they just didn't really seem to work well for me, imo). Also, change doesn't come naturally to me. I don't love Vortex's interface (call me an old-fashioned modder, heh). It makes things easier, sure, but I guess that part of me just loves to crack down some puzzles that come with modding. I've had my fair share of that with Mod Organizer and, even though I loved using it, it was maybe a little bit too challenging for me. :P Hope that answers your question. ^^

In response to post #64250851. #64250896, #64250931 are all replies on the same post. Aaaaaah, that's actually good news! Thanks! I'll keep an eye on GitHub, then. :-)

In response to post #64250851. Thanks for your answer. My question was aimed at this bit from the original post: Just wondering whether it would be possible to still keep NMM as the "download with manager" manager or if the transition is, indeed, necessary.

Hey Nexus team, thanks for this. I'm sadly one of the people that does not identify with Vortex; I'd just like to know whether it'd be possible to allow us to choose the manager we want to download with upon clicking the "Download with Manager" button, in the future, instead of just making it no longer compatible with NMM. Sorry if that's a dumb question, I'm a noob when it comes to things like this. :-)

Wind's howling.

THE CAKE IS A LIE

Managed to login! Thank you so much. :3 EDIT: AAAND one mod got the wrong ID. Probably my fault, since it's a Skyrim mod, not a SSE one. Just textures though, so it works. Just letting you people know!

Thank you SO much for the 'Sticky' Post. I've thought, several times, that it'd be a feature I'd mostly love if it were ever added to the comments system here on Nexus. It surely will save me a lot of trouble when it comes to folk who don't like to read. ;)

I guess that the "No Nudity Allowed" line needs to be more accurate, then. What *is* considered nudity: simple bare skin as seen in artworks or explicit genitalia? Really, guys. I am one of the members who keeps reporting images when they are way too revealing and such, but this... this is something else.

As this was the first time I tried using this Studio mod, I had quite a bit of fun. This fact somewhat got noticeable in my screenshots, heh. I took several because I didn't know which would look good on the artwork. Also, if they're completely un-workable, tell me soon! Please. I'll be away for some time, starting from tomorrow, and I'd like to let everything ready before I leave. Grab the screenshots here. Looking forward to seeing the result! :happy:

Ooooh, this is shiny! :teehee: Make sure to add Valdis to the list! She's so very eager to join in. I'll send the links to the screenshots within a few moments.

Before the site update, the images would appear in the description without a problem. Flickr's ones still do, at least for me. Perhaps if an account there was created just to gather screenshots like these? Or better: a group?

Updated the description. Thanks for the code!

Hi, everybody. I wanted to participate so bad that I ended uploading a screenshot here. If you want to add it to the wallpaper collection, feel free. :happy: Also, I took the liberty to add my username to the end of the usernames list that Sol wrote. I'm a newbie when it comes to forum codes, so I have no idea how to attach an image to the post. :unsure: The image download link is here; the original file is in .PNG format.

I love you so much. :teehee: