What's that got to do with a lore-friendly debate/dispute? Besides, if one cannot control oneself when posting here, maybe one shouldn't bother posting at all, yes? This is a mature site, not 4chan. Gimme a break :rolleyes: If someone puts up a giant purple banana as a replacement for an Greatsword (in DragonAge for example), tags it as Lore-Friendly and it gets (obviously) disputed... what's there to debate. So please :rolleyes: And "those people" are irrelevant for this topic. My point was that NO ONE here is qualified to determine what mods are or aren't "good enough", or "lore-friendly enough", or "appropriate enough". (Except Dark0ne, of course!) As long as the content is within the Terms of Service, (and if it contains certain material it is tagged as "Adult") then it can be posted. And anyone who tries to tell others that their contributions don't belong is not welcome. If a mod is tagged with the "Weapon" category, but it's actually a combat tweak, that's an error the Staff might feel justified in correcting. While it is a judgement call, it's not a value judgement. But when I post my Arthurian-themed armour mod and tag it as "Lore-Friendly" because I think it fits right into Tamriel, and you think that's ridiculous and Report it, who judges? And when I argue with you in the public forums because I feel slighted by your comments, how is that helpful? And when we both get banned for insulting each other, everyone loses. :confused: I totally understand what you mean. Personally, I wouldn't call your Arthurian-themed armour Lore-Friendly. More like Theme-Friendly since wouldn't be totally out of place ;) . But this could happen to almost every single tag-search option if you're honest. You could say this to already existing tag options too.