Jump to content

m3th0d2008

Members
  • Posts

    19
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Nexus Mods Profile

About m3th0d2008

m3th0d2008's Achievements

Apprentice

Apprentice (3/14)

  • First Post
  • Collaborator Rare
  • Week One Done
  • One Month Later
  • One Year In

Recent Badges

0

Reputation

  1. The wonkyness happens already in the MainMenu. Doesn't matter if I deactivate all the mods or not. It acts a little slower, feels unprecise. Quite the same as it does with activated MouseAccell but way, way more subtle. With VSync off it's absolutely precise.
  2. It's not the framerate that is low, it's the mouse that feels wonky when it's active. I already deactivated the mouse acceleration. It has absolutely nothing to do with my performance since the mouse is wonky even when my fps is maxed at 60fps vsynced to my display's 60hz. Ontop of that, I never had any problems before the update that forced it on everyone. Gamebryo behaving weird again, that's what it is.
  3. I've suddenly the same problem. Never had that before. But I should mention that this is the first time that I play with the latest official patch that forced VSync on everyone. I deactivated it via the .ini files. Maybe that's the cause why the lips move way too fast. *EDIT* Yep, just as I thought. This is caused by deactivating VSync in the .ini files. iPresentInterval=1 (VSync on, lips sync) iPresentInterval=0 (VSync off, lips going crazy) This really sucks because I did the standard MouseAccel fix but it still felt wonky. I googled abit and found out that they forced VSync on everyone with the most recent patch (the checkbox in the Launcher Options has no effect anymore) so I deactivated VSync in the .ini files and all was good again... except for the lips of madness. Guess I have to live with a bit of wonkiness since the lip desync is unbearable :D
  4. Ty :D Couldn't access the site at all but after I deleted my cookies everything was working fine again.
  5. Hm, it seems like I can't download anything on the NV-Nexus site. Skyrim-Nexus and FO3-nexus are working fine. I also get "Bad Gateway" messages for the whole page after a download fails to initiate.
  6. I just wanted to make Uthgerd in the Bannered Mare following me, but she wasn't there. So I used the console to port myself to her and this is where I ended up. http://www.abload.de/img/tesv2011-11-2714-02-3g1os0.jpg I'd like to add that the room is cross shaped, there are two coffins in it, if you go through those dark doorways you'll end up falling into darkness and end up in this room again, you can't escape from there since fast traver doesn't work (have to load a previous save) and those aren't graphical glitches. The room looks that way. Any idea what this is and what's the purpose of it?
  7. Allright, good enough. Will suggest it again then when it's finished.
  8. What's that got to do with a lore-friendly debate/dispute? Besides, if one cannot control oneself when posting here, maybe one shouldn't bother posting at all, yes? This is a mature site, not 4chan. Gimme a break :rolleyes: If someone puts up a giant purple banana as a replacement for an Greatsword (in DragonAge for example), tags it as Lore-Friendly and it gets (obviously) disputed... what's there to debate. So please :rolleyes: And "those people" are irrelevant for this topic. My point was that NO ONE here is qualified to determine what mods are or aren't "good enough", or "lore-friendly enough", or "appropriate enough". (Except Dark0ne, of course!) As long as the content is within the Terms of Service, (and if it contains certain material it is tagged as "Adult") then it can be posted. And anyone who tries to tell others that their contributions don't belong is not welcome. If a mod is tagged with the "Weapon" category, but it's actually a combat tweak, that's an error the Staff might feel justified in correcting. While it is a judgement call, it's not a value judgement. But when I post my Arthurian-themed armour mod and tag it as "Lore-Friendly" because I think it fits right into Tamriel, and you think that's ridiculous and Report it, who judges? And when I argue with you in the public forums because I feel slighted by your comments, how is that helpful? And when we both get banned for insulting each other, everyone loses. :confused: I totally understand what you mean. Personally, I wouldn't call your Arthurian-themed armour Lore-Friendly. More like Theme-Friendly since wouldn't be totally out of place ;) . But this could happen to almost every single tag-search option if you're honest. You could say this to already existing tag options too.
  9. And who decides if a mod is "Lore Friendly" enough when there's a dispute? Since you swinged the banhammer today in the comments section of some Anime themed mod, at people who feel like me but weren't capable of controlling themselves, I'm extremely surprised to see such a cheap attempt from you.
  10. I repeat it again, since you totally didn't get it (again!) and accuse me of stuff I've never did or said (Ty again for that btw): The modders would decide this themselves. Adding two options for Lore/Theme-Friendly and Lore/Theme-Unfriendly can't be too hard and I would be surprised if this would be too big of a deal for them. And a user could just filter them. Just like the adult content. There you go :thumbsup:
  11. The modders would decide this themselves. Adding two options for Lore/Theme-Friendly and Lore/Theme-Unfriendly can't be too hard and I would be surprised if this would be too big of a deal for them. And a user could just filter them. Just like the adult content.
  12. God job at missing my point completely. Somehow I feel accused of something I've never done by your answer(!) too. Doesn't look like you've even read my post. :rolleyes:
  13. You've got an adult content blocker but not one for silly stuff. So people get banned when they don't like those mods and dare to state their opinion in the comments. Stating that those people are ignorant yaddayaddayadda and got banned because of that... You're only allowed to comment on a mod when it's an positive opinion or bug reporting. (I've seen people getting banned for constructive criticism too in ON/F3N/NVN) Those are the rules here and I've never did such thing myself. But this somewhat kind of hypocrisy is ******* me off actually. People who don't like those kind of mods are getting swarmed by those when they're browsing through mods. You can't filter that stuff out. It's annoying. Possibly as annoying as those opinions/hateful comments themselves. Couldn't you make an mark/filter for mods which possibly break immersion (are out of place)? I'm still baffled why this still hasn't happened after all these years. I lived through this with the help of ignorance(!) and grinding my teeth all these years. Now with Skyrim, I thought, let's just ask for it in the forums before I can't eat delicious steaks anymore.
×
×
  • Create New...