KaiSenpai

I'd like to say... I'm pretty much against them getting a cut (valve and bethesda) of 75% and letting the modder with only 25% of it. They SHOULD and IT'S THEIR RIGHT to get a CUT. But not that much, I would dare to say that if bethesda got 10, and valve 10, we would be more than happy to pay for mods (assuming that our "trial time" is more than only 24hrs). There would still be free mods, it wouldn't die like that. Now to the main point, what I'm trying to say is, their idea was good, but it was poorly executed. It is a god damn idea to let modders charge for their hardwork (guys, even a good weapon/armor mod takes time and effort, do not belittle it), but they handled it wrongly, they should've explained what they were trying to do, not simply throw it at us, it doesn't work like that. Modding is a passion, sure, but life costs money, and you can't expect good modders that wanna spend all their time to make a perfect mod, to live without money. Wake up, it's real life. You want an example? Let's say that you found a job that you love doing, you would be happy to work on that, right? But you'll also expect compensation for your work, even though you love that, you can't work and not get paid, BECAUSE YOU NEED TO PAY YOUR BILLS AND OTHER THINGS, IT'S THE SAME FOR MODDERS, LET THEM HAVE MONEY. Now, to conclude all, before someone comes and throws me at hell for stating my opinion on the internet, I would like to clarify that I am against that move, because it was POORLY EXECUTED (much like my english). It all needs much more thinking, if they decide to think about it, and decide to do a system where everything is fair, both for us (users), modders and bethesta/valve, then, you can surely expect me to approve their actions and, if possible, help them. Lastly, I wish you all happy lives x3