So I have two Hypothetical Scenarios. 1. If you went to Never land and found a group of people who became immortal whilst in a Childlike state. They've grown up mentally and socially, but not physically. They've gone through all of the hardships that comes with adult life and (depending on whether they've actually reached adolescence) had children of their own (It happens.) Is the line drawn between the act of killing an under 18/16/14 year old or is it simply an appearance thing? Or is it a case of being /As represented/ under 18/16/14? 2. Is it the ability to do the act that Bethesda is trying to stop the player doing, or is it the possible association with reward for doing so? (For example, kill a kid to prevent him from telling on you for killing a Hobo, that substantiates as a positive consequence of killing a child for the player and ding ding ding ding ding Bethesda gets blamed.) Perhaps it requires that Mob Mentality for the player to understand the 'Wrongness' of that action. I'm talking beyond the Fawks nooze and the bad press, but literally the moral repercussions of glorifying - vs - making available - vs - making available and condemning an action through the game mechanics. Can you have the game take a neutral stance on doing the unthinkable? Because if it's a neutral stance that will also get Bethesda a bad rep, that's *censored*, because in the real world, Children DO die, whether we morally support it or not. The simple truth is that it still happens. In an extreme case you can say that we are all indirectly responsible for the death of children by buying this game instead of giving it to poor, starving Ethiopians (Very, very extreme example, I'm not saying it's true, but it's food for thought especially for you, Sistergoldring.) If Bethesda Glorified it, which they couldn't, then it would be justified in getting a bad reputation. If Bethesda allowed it but gave strictly negative consequences to the act then it doesn't reinforce the players actions, and Bethesda can't be held accountable because they've acknowledged the wrongness of the act. Anyway. Just my two dollars (given inflation it's probably only worth 2 cents anyway in the current U.S market)