TheDokktor

:laugh: Yeah your right, both of you, no argument so you can both go troll somewhere else as I will not be replying any further to your argumentative replies. I will only suggest you re-read the whole topic (not argument) and think seriously instead of replying with the first things that enter your minds. Cya and erm, thanks I suppose.

Sorry for not replying sooner, been doing other real world business. Anyway, to cover all comments lets start from the top. Ethreon, (and QZ) you clearly don't understand what I am saying or you are just replying in the most basic terms not wanting to understand. I am talking about modders either using the Nexus free site to endorse a paid for mod by another semi qualified modder, by the free upload of a mod (by them) for any particular paid for mod, IE the creation club (CC). Now I know that's a bit of a sentence but please take your time and read it slowly. I am assuming this CC is a full paid for site and not a free content download. The modder could also be using the Nexus site to advertise an update for their own paid mod that they may have created for the CC and which they rely on downloads for payment, obviously the mod which cannot be downloaded from the Nexus would then be mentioned in the commentary. Niborino, no not really, I trust the above gives more clarity in what I mean. GG, that's correct, and welI spotted, I of course meant advertised and not 'distributed' in my comment. I understand the comment you make in your opening sentence. And to your final point, no its not that difficult to ignore this but, as I pointed out, I have made a subscription which removes the advertising logo from my browser, I am advising that it annoys me to see mods advertising the fact that you need content from another site IE the CC site, for the particular mod update to work. If this is to apply to the CC site then surely any update from the creator or another modder should be made available on the original download site. Further to my comment on Moddrop, on the contrary QZ, I know full well what the software tries to achieve, albeit not in the best way I'm sure, but it appears only the modding faction have taken unrest on this particular 'mod' due to some reasoning, that they don't get the appropriate recognition for their work. Now far be it for me to try and understand someone's drive or ambition, but surely if a mod is indeed free in every sense of the word, then they forfeit the rights they think they have when making any 'free' mod available to the public domain.

I am a little bit annoyed that since renewing my subscription, I now find that Nexus is allowing creation club content to be distributed advertised through its pages, obviously providing you already have the 'paid for' content. Can you not at least make a seperate page for creation club users? I was glad to see that the mod to remove the creation club logo was so heavily downloaded and endorsed, now as a kick in the teeth we can find mods for that same paid for content. C'mon Nexus, do something about this, their users already have a link at Beth, they don't need an outlet here too. Is this due to the recent Moddrop rage that went on and on because of some upset modders.

Hmm there seems to be a lot of inter discussion and feedback on something that no one, other than the developers, knows about. As a gamer I am not really interested in load order and virtual this or that, all I do ask is this, will using 'Vortex' help me to play games at work without my boss finding out? And Tannin42, please quit replying to the haters, that will be another reason for them to complain. If you want, I could reply for you, it would be, short, nasty and to the point, but I would make it clear that their views at this stage are irrelevant, in my own way of course.