richroots

As Ive stated before that seperation of powers is irrelevant when you weigh human psychology against collectives ability to run a society, government or private enterprise. The cupidity of the individual or individuals even seeking to do good will always cease power. You can't legislate away the fundamental issues with collectivism. There's no argument that anyone can provide to counter the mountains of historical evidence against the fundamental failures of collectivism. You can't have a seperation of powers without tyranny present. There's no argument that can prove this historical truth invalid. Communism,Marxism,fascism, and socialism always become corrupted. Pretending otherwise is absurd.

Do Do you think that it can be applied to the western world as a whole safely? I have my doubts. Maybe with education, but a lot of people recoil at the very mention of weapons. One journalist mentions that he got PTSD from just trying a fire arm.

S I posted to refute that misinformation and say the whole process (and thus, the video) was a pointless waste of time and money. So what you're telling me is that you didn't watch the video and debate about the audit okay thank you for your statements. I still don't see any misinformation that you're talking about after actually watching the audit. I disagree entirely and I reject your hypothesis about the OP being misinformation and watched the audit in it's entirety, respectfully. I'd also like to add that misinformation really does not seem to be appropriate when we're talking about evidence provided during the audit.

No one is talking about who won? The debate is about audit and election security. There is no misinformation listed in the post the video is the audit? Did you watch it? Also your posting after reading simply is an opinion piece, and does not include any investigative journalism. Seems suspect. I much rather go with the doctorates in the audit itself. And I still need to fact check the experts in the actual audit, but given the docorates have in the audit have shown EMS logins and data, it brings into question serious security questions about the legitimacy of using machines. Which is what the debate is about. Do you care to watch the video then rephrase it's over 2 hours long?

West Virginia’s Crime Rates Decline After State Adopts Constitutional Carry Law FBI data indicates a steady decline in violent crime since 2016 when the policy was approved by the state’s legislature I am generally uncomfortable around weapons and firearms. I am mostly on the fence about this issue. Perhaps if I took or could afford gun lessons or lived in US I live in Canada. Here in Canada weapons bans seemingly have to lead to an increase in crime. I don't like the idea of carrying a gun or ending someones life to protect mine. But I can see the logic in the self defense for women and other vulnerable people. I again am firmly on the fence on this issue. Should constitutional carry be implemented in the US as a whole? Is it really safter? In the microcosm of West Virginia according to the FBI the data indicates a steady decline of violent crime. That means less violence not more, less bad people hurting innocent people. Which is good news.. There are some takeaways however West Virginia already has a gun culture. Other places that don't misuse of firearms could be well dangerous in other places besides west virgin where untrained people have access to weapons. Data indicates that less gun crime has happened.. Is this simply an anomaly? Could this be applied to the rest of the western world safely? If so why? or Why not? I can clearly see the pros and cons of this argument and I'm on the fence. Please try to be civil in the debate and objective. Thank you. Discuss. Sources https://timcast.com/news/west-virginias-crime-rates-decline-after-state-adopts-constitutional-carry-law/

https://rumble.com/vmxdt2--maricopa-county-election-audit-results-hearing-the-charlie-kirk-show-live-.html The above video could not be posted for some reason so I provided an alternate link to the full audit to provide context to this debate. Both parties have claimed security issues in the last two elections and danger due to potential security issues. Should we replace hand counted votes with machines given the evidence provided in the audit. This debate isn't about who won or didn't win so please try to stay on topic.

The Audit in Maricopa county revealed over 50,000 illegal ballots including duplications that were proven to be counted in the audit. Should we continue to trust machines to count votes of machines without outdated security software that hasn't been updated since 2019 and have proven to shown ESM login attempts on multiple servers. Experts in pattern recognition with multiple doctorates lay out how they discovered the discrepancies in the audit. The full Audit review can be found here https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ukitwzb_p44 Should humans count the votes or machines? Are machines vulnerable? Discuss.

And that isn't relevant to the stated topic at all. And is a narrow-minded view of 3D modelling skill set to limit the use to one specific program. I don't understand what your issue is you're talking to an industry professional and I have given solid useful advice. Some of the modders in this particular community don't use blender or Zbrush and solely use outfit studio exclusively. I fail to see why you hung up on niff being the defining factor here. As I've stated MOST 3D modellers use multiple programs. STL files the main 3D file that the majority of none CAD based software use is transferable between multiple programs. It is simply a matter of using a superior program to export a 3D file from Zbrush to Blender or outfit studio and then export it as a Niff. Something you don't need a mastery of Blender to learn how to do and can be learned in less then 10 minutes. There is no reason to start with blender except to waste your time. The topic is specifically which 3D programs are good for beginners. I have answered the topic and provided context. What makes you think that I'm suggesting NOT to use only one program? Your statement is moot and irrelevant sorry to say but it isn't relevant to the topic of whether or not a program can use NIFFs or not is not a factor in people learning 3D modelling. I go on to actually state that people should LEARN multiple programs and recommend learning both Zbrush and Blender. So I don't understand what point you're trying to make here other than showing you lack practical experience in the field, and don't have a grasp of 3D modelling beyond a laymen understanding of the software. No offense meant. But you're stuck on the idea that somehow being able to export a niff is something that's important when it's not. Simply Import and STL file from a superior easier to learn software in either outfit studio or blender then export it as a niff. I don't see a problem with my analysis of which 3D software is friendly for beginners.

And remember, all the Republican Senators from those self same Southern States who believe the Big Lie (the election was stolen from Lying Little Donnie) voted against a federal level voting rights law. Why do you suppose that is? Oh, yeah! I remember! They gotta keep all those folks who just ain't quite white enough from voting. Why do I believe this. In 1977, I was home in my native village and a black man walked into the tavern. He wasn't the first black man I had ever seen, but he was the biggest. We got to talking and I learned he worked at one of the local logging camps. Every week thereafter, we met and talked. I told him about my youth in a Regional Residential Indian School and he told me about his youth in the Jim Crow South. At the age of seven, his uncle was castrated and hung from a tree for participating in a parade honoring WWII Veterans, which he was. At age nine his cousin was beaten to death and then hung and castrated for "looking at a white woman". At age fourteen, his younger sister was raped and her eviscerated body left in a "blacks only" park. At sixteen, his father was hung from his own front porch with a burning cross on his front lawn for the crime of attempting to register to vote. That same year, 37 black people were killed in Mississippi for attempting to register to vote. The school and church he attended were firebombed, as were four of his neighbors homes. Three women were dragged into the local community square and beaten and burned to death for teaching people how to fill out a ballot. So the next time someone spouts "it's all about voter fraud prevention", you know the truth. It is part of the centuries old racist attempt to disenfranchise black voters. Black voters commit voting fraud. Remember, voter fraud is defined as "voting for a democrat". “Never argue with stupid people, they will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience.” - Mark Twain All five movies from the series of Planet of the Apes, for sale at "Google Play" for only $49.99. See if you spot President Biden's and ex-President Trump's "speeches likeness" in any of the Planet of the Apes movies sequels. Even in these time we are being dragged down to the beast's level of threats and lies, and experience is showing us again, beating each of us down with experience. That is just what Samuel Longhorne Clemens's words tell us. So, remember, "Never argue with STUPID PEOPLE!" That's what the left does constantly spread dangerous misinformation and conspiracy theories. It's like you've never heard of CNN. Also interesting word usage. Why do you think words are dangerous? What does that imply that you should remove people's ability to speak freely? Don't bother responding with canned responses. There is no use arguing with an ideologically driven person that does not look at both left and right and centrist ideologies and conclude that any of them are free of misinformation. But it's laughable that you think the left do anything but lie. The entirety of movement is based on liars, that others think they know better than anyone else and is willing to LIE obfuscate because they don't think people are capable of self-governance and need an "enlightened leftist" to ensure that they don't hear any naughty words. It's like the government saying you can't eat stakes because an infant can't chew it. If your claim is misinformation on the right, which rarely happens. It's about 1000X as prevalent on the left. Not to mention the amount of racism, bigotry, violence, hate on the left it puts the entirety of the extreme far-right to shame. Hell even Richard Spencer self-proclaimed neo nazi was happy that Biden was elected. The perfect example is to look at the Comedian Ryan Long's skit When Wokes and Racists Actually Agree on Everything. LMAO okay bud you can continue to obfuscate and claim that all right-wing personalities share views and cherry pick specific points by crazed lunatics. But there are fact-based intellectual discourse that is backed up by degrees, doctorates and reasoned and fact-based personalities on center-right and center that continue to expose the left's bigotry and racism. Dr Steven Pinker for one and Dr. Jordan Peterson. Dr Gad Saad as other examples if you're not sure who Dr Steven Pinker, Dr Jordan Pertson and Dr Gad Saad then you're woefully lacking the ability to argue any of your points besides a zealous emotional response. You can lie all you want to and try to claim that I'm only listening to false information but you would be factually mistaken. Here is Jordan Peterson Crushing it at the Munk Debates. I highly recommend watching the the entire Munk Debates it features Stephan Fry and Jordan Peterson both intellectuals one is a liberal one is conservative https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F4dBiL8gTvM Here is a link to the full munk debates. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mcSS91IsDk4 rather then just the quick highlights again proving you wrong. Over two hours of proving you wrong actually available for anyone to look at. Since you're doing nothing but insulting people here and provide nothing but a joke of a response you're not prepared to debate. And as for your false claim that the left is anything but an extreme minority of liars. Simply look online. The most popular podcast in the world Joe Rogan Centrist was extensively lied about taking horse dewormer. The majority of leftist media lied so much so that Joe is considering suing them for defamation. That is the kind of liars the left are. Ivermectin is approved for human use and cures/treats rive blindness. And one a Nobel prize for being human-based use as an antiviral agent. But it's so suppressed that the left is willing to prevent treatment and KILL people all because of ideological motives. Canada being such a country not willing to support the use of this safe and nobel prize wining anti viral because of idealogy. Willfully ensuring people die to support a false narrative by not providing safe treatment. I can pull up the stats on Ivermerctin if you want. Here is the video below. Despite Ivermectin being safe for human use and can be prescribed as an anti-viral. There is more than enough evidence to support this factual claim. But the left continues to intentionally disallow this safe and effective treatment to people because of that misinformation. Here is a leftist publication out right lying about ivermectin and Joe Rogan Furthermore DR fauci the main leftist doctor in charge of the US covid propaganda was proven to have lied unequivocally to congress about the gain of function research. Again factual information. I can post any links you need to both leftist and right sources. But again if you want to keep pretending what you're claiming has merit it's unlikely you will seek to be anything but in an echo chamber. Here is an example of proof that leftists lied about gain of function research. Here is another video about leftist that lie. We have gone through multiple lies ont he left from "No masking, to masking, to no we're not going to mandate, to mandates, to no there won't be boosters to, no there are boosters. From My body my choice to "you have no choice of medical agency" It is unlikely you will be willing to have an intellectual debate because you appear to be ideologically possessed. If you want the facts yourself look it up. But by all means, continue to believe in fairy tales. I'm more than prepared for your canned responses and have heard all of the left-wing sociopathic racist responses and denounce the excessive racist bigotry of the left. If you want facts I have them. I myself am not anti-vax and your dog whistle isn't welcome, not intellectual and not factual. There are far more extremist leftists than there are on right. Your issue is that you're in an echo chamber and are cherry-picking. You can continue to lie and try to put words in people's mouths. But If I was you I would take a long long look in the mirror and really deeply consider why you're supporting a movement that is so anti compassionate and so inhuman that mirrors many of the evil policies that fascists during ww2 practiced regularlly. Such as critical race theory. I for one would never want to live in the sad sad extremist world of the majority of leftists seem to live in. The racism alone of the left is enough to dissuade most sensible people from being lefty. It's like you didn't even watch the video by Ryan Long. I don't expect a reasoned and intellectual response or the ability for you to respond with anything but lies so good luck.

I'll write something. But you would need to concisely explain what you need the writer to do.

I ported a mod today from Oldrim to SE and it worked use. CAO little complicated but once you know how it works it's nifity

I wasn't happy with the Belt on the original image so I cracked open gimp and did a proof of concept. Originally uploaded by LOrdOfWar and imported from witcher. So clearly not my work. The Shield is under the Legendary Alpha Shields. Axe honestly not sure about Viking weapons or something I'll find out later and give them credit. Anyways not to shabby for a proof of concept. I will refine it later on. It needs belt loops. Here's the original Sky-rim mod Letho's Pants at Skyrim Nexus - Mods and Community (nexusmods.com) The Special Edition mod was just recently moved to Hidden as far as I can tell. I'm going to try to reach out to LOrdOfWar to see if I can post this version once I do a better job texturing it. So everyone can have pants.. Seriously why does skyrim hate pants so much? Keep in mind I only just modified the belt nothing else. I'm just playing around with assets right now. If I can figure this out easily brand new assets are not far off.

You misunderstood. Blender does not have any tutorials that are officially released by blender that you don't have to google search yourself and are scattered about youtube by third parties which may or may not be effective tools to learn with. They also may have conflicting information or be inneffective instructors or waste your development time. Zbrush on the other hand comes with access to the ZBrush classroom which includes videos from industry giants like Micheal Pavolich hundreds of specific videos that are designed to teach people how to learn Zbrush in effective easy to learn stages without youtube searching. As in it's MUCH quicker to learn zbrush as a whole then it is blender. As for the Nif format that's not even remotely important as you can export most STL and 3D files into the blender then learn to export them in less than a minute. Whether or not ZBrush natively supports NIFF is entirely irrelevant. Most 3D modellers worth their salt use multiple programs. And a five-minute video on exporting a mesh into a nif format is easy. Blender is a program that will hinder your development as a professional if used exclusively. Zbrush will not. Niff or not the topic was what's the easiest software to learn. Zbrush takes the cake as the easiest software to learn. It also has hotkeys but they are not required to use it. Therefore you don't require extensively learning hotkeys. Ease of accessibility as well for Zbrush. As far as features, as for 3D modelling, Zbrush crushes blender in every possible way. Lastly Blender is foremost an animation software with 3D modelling software tacked on. Zbrush is a professional grade 3D modelling software that is industry standard. It is necessary to land you a job if you're lucky get the opportunity. Learning exclusively blender will close doors for your career. It should be noted that most professionals use multiple programs for different reasons. I use four programs including zbrush and blender. I'm not saying Blender is bad I am saying that it's not a place that people starting out as 3D modellers should use. In addition, 3D modelling is not recommended without an extensive understanding of art fundamentals, anatomy, and creativity start there first. I mean that do not skip on anatomy or your fundamentals. You need a strong foundation to be successful. 3D sculpting software is unique compared to CAD based engineering software. I would not recommend blender in place of Solid Works or other CAD based programs. Nor would I recommend z brush in place of Solid works for engineering To conclude Start with art fundementals or go home. After about a year of study get Zbrush or learn in parallel , pick up blender once you've studied Zbrush for a year, however you will be better of with Maya then blender. As for your last comment again actually no you can beat free. Learning blender can and will hold your career back if used exclusively. Just because it is free does not mean it is good if you want a job you should learn Maya and Zbrush and photoshop. Blender will hinder your development as a 3D modeller take you longer to master and isn't industry standard. If time = money and it does. Blender will in fact cost you more money then Zbrush. Skills learnt in Zbrush are transferable, the skills learnt in blender are transferable to a lesser degree. Just because something is free does not mean it will be useful.

Now you got me curious. What exactly is happening in Germany, might I ask? Sorry, I quoted the wrong post. Canada, US, Germany, France leaders all ideological hard left aka extremist left all use the phrase "Build Back Better" -Germany Germany's Angela Merkel calls for tougher coronavirus restrictions. ... "We have to build back better," she said, taking a line from US President-elect Joe Biden I think Joe was more referring to our sadly neglected infrastructure.... Which really is a good idea. Trouble is, they are including so much SJW crap in the bill, that no republican in his right mind, would even consider voting for it. It's reasonably hard to figure out what Joe is saying on anything. 'trunalimunumaprzure'. "I'll lead an effective strategy to mobilize true ninternuvidu presher," or maybe it was "trunalimunumaprzure." It could have been "true inder nah ma preh zer." But whatever it was, it was unclear. "Build Back Better" was coined by a man named Klaus Schwab. Schwab, now in his eighties is a German who actually founded the World Economic Forum. Delingpole says that it has been said that Davos is "where billionaires go to lecture millionaires how ordinary people live.". "You Will Own Nothing and Be Happy," said Klaus Schwab, Founder and Executive Chairman of the World Economic Forum. As Anthony P. Mueller, a professor of economics, warns, "The main thrust of the forum is global control. Free markets and individual choice do not stand as the top values, but state interventionism and collectivism. wiki -"Schwab as publisher of the World Economic Forum's 2010 "Global Redesign" report postulates that a globalized world is best managed by a coalition of multinational corporations, governments (including through the UN system) and select civil society organizations (CSOs).[29] It argues that governments no longer are "the overwhelmingly dominant actors on the world stage" and that “the time has come for a new stakeholder paradigm of international governance”. The WEF's vision includes a "public-private" UN, in which certain specialized agencies would operate under joint State and non-State governance systems.[30] According to the Transnational Institute (TNI), the Forum is hence planning to replace a recognised democratic model with a model where a self-selected group of "stakeholders" make decisions on behalf of the people.[31] The think tank summarises that we are increasingly entering a world where gatherings such as Davos are "a silent global coup d'etat" to capture governance." So when four or more world leaders all part of the same ideological collectivist groups say "Build Back Better" It's not a coincidence. Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has now openly referred to his federal government’s post-COVID-19 economic policies as complying with “The Great Reset,” the title of a document first published in 2016 by the World Economic Forum (WEF). The Canadian PM is focused on using the uncertain times created by the pandemic to “Build Back Better” and reshape our country’s economic and social make-up. I personally don't agree with all of Russle brands point but it further explains what's going on.

Now you got me curious. What exactly is happening in Germany, might I ask? Sorry, I quoted the wrong post. Canada, US, Germany, France leaders all ideological hard left aka extremist left all use the phrase "Build Back Better" -Germany Germany's Angela Merkel calls for tougher coronavirus restrictions. ... "We have to build back better," she said, taking a line from US President-elect Joe Biden