iamlegend999

So I am using this mod, the Gypsy Eyes Caravan: http://www.nexusmods.com/skyrim/mods/33219/? Anyway, if you look in the user images there is this: http://static-2.nexusmods.com/15/mods/110/images/33219-2-1376669564.jpg Well, that looks awesome. I would love to add a pegasus to my caravan. But all that is in the description is "Pegasus mod with console commands". I know of only two pegasus mods, the mlp flyable one and the alicorn and pegasus one, and the one in the image looks like the latter. My question is, how do I set up the right pegasus mod and use the console to connect my gypsy cart to the pegasus and fly? Are there other mods involved? Thanks.

Cmon, any replies?

anything else, anyone?

68" TV with a nice comfy recliner leather couch and a gamepad.... I get enough of a computer "office" setup at work. I see why you would want this, but it doesn't work in my house...

I'm pretty sure I can get past 60 as I run two evga gtx 670 ftws in sli. How bad are these issues? Should I be concerned and do you mind posting a link or something? Is it small, or does it affect the majority? Also, its Skyrim completely overhauled and modded.

Alright thank you for your reply. But I read that with 120hz 2d you can have smoother, more realistic gameplay.

So I am getting a new monitor, and I really want to know which viewing type offers the best visual quality for skyrim. 1. 120hz 2d on S27A950D-27in. Tn panel 2d 1080p 120hz display. 2. Nvidia 3d vision 2 on asus vg278h-27in. Tn panel with 3d, 1080p, 120hz. 3. 60hz 2d on S27A850D-27in. Ips panel 2d 2560x1440p 60hz. Which of these three options will make skyrim (enhanced with graphical improvement mods) look best?

Alright, I'm curious. I need to buy (a) better monitor(s) for skyrim, since my current one is crap. So, which setup do you thing adds the most visual quality and immersion to Skyrim? Also, feel free to recommend specific monitors. Also, I would like to know about fps loss while gaming with mods with a single 1080p 2d (3d turned off) monitor vs. your setup fps loss. I run 200+ mods, and have an evga gtx 670 ftw video card. If you also run mods in Skyrim, please give an estimate to how many you have, whether you have texture upgrades, and whether you have enbs (High fps loss and low fps loss enbs. Please specify, if you will).Please remember to also say what kind of graphics card you have, your setup, how that compares to a single 3d 1080p hd monitor, and your texture upgrades and enbs. Any other visual overhaul mods would also be helpful. Thanks!

Hello, should i use 3 led gaming monitors off of my evga ftw overclocked gtx 670 or use a single led 3d gaming monitor off the same card? It's either or, I can't afford 3 3d displays. What I mean is, which would make Skyrim look and feel better and more immersive? The regular led monior that I will by 3 of: http://tinyurl.com/7jwy58p 3d monitor: http://tinyurl.com/6tlf6rp Also, I am open to suggestions. If you think there are better monitors for Skyrim or better setups, please let me know.

They don't want to spend the money, even though it is painfully apparent that is required. Oh. LOL, that really WAS a stupid question on my part. :D

So... why doesn't bethesda use a new engine? This might be stupid, but I am seriously extremely new to Skyrim and video games in general. What prevents them from updating their equipment?

So,,, why not use a newer engine perhaps? Just sayin'. I mean, there engine still uses dx9, so.. Also, what does setting the timescale to a lower number do? Are you sure changing it even sightly won't cause problems? It just changes how many real world hours are in a "Skyrim day". The number in the "set timescale to xx" is how many times faster than real life you want it to be. I.e if i's default at 25 then that will mean 1 hour in real life = 25 hours in Skyrim. That's way too fast for me. I'm the same as Eric, I use 10 - it's a nice balance and I've had no problems at all with it at that speed (used this on Skyrim and FONV with no problems). There's less risk (IMO) in changing the timescale than there is in using most mods. As long as you don't take it to extremes. alright then, thanks.

So,,, why not use a newer engine perhaps? Just sayin'. I mean, there engine still uses dx9, so.. Bethesda? Use a new engine? You crack me up. :P What do you mean?

So,,, why not use a newer engine perhaps? Just sayin'. I mean, there engine still uses dx9, so.. Also, what does setting the timescale to a lower number do? Are you sure changing it even sightly won't cause problems?

Alright. So I have heard and read that skyrim is about 16mi^2 (44km^2). Fair enough, I guess, except that seems hilariously small for an area in which it take several days to travel from one end to the other. Seriously, I'm confused! This seems like a glaring error that Bethesda should have spotted right away, and either fixed their timescale or fixed their land size (A better adjustment). I mean RPG games like Skyrim are all about fantastical reality, and the least they could have don was added something to the lore about this! If Skyrim is 16mi^2, then Tamriel is so small that I don't even want to think about it! And even if we assume Tamriel is small, in the lore, it takes them like months to get from Cyrodil to Skyrim. I just don't think the size is relative to the timescale, honestly. On another note, the 7000 steps are no where near that much, but that, I suppose I can understand. This article says that skyrim is about the size of Oklahoma,, which seems much more reasonable: "5. ZERO-EFFORT CARDIO Do you get out of breath when you walk up a flight of stairs? How about when you clamber out of your car? Kiss those problems goodbye in Skyrim. You can traverse the game's rolling landscapes without having to set foot inside a gym. Skyrim contains over 68,000 square miles of painstakingly-constructed terrain to explore, all of which combined is roughly the size of Oklahoma. Have you ever wanted to jog from Kansas to Texas? And while carrying a shield? Now you can." So which is it, 68000 or 16 mi^2? Source: http://www.adultswim...-real-life.html Map of Tamriel: http://images.wikia....Tamriel_map.gif Edit: LOL wait... I should have looked more into that article lol. It appearsto be all a joke. Gullible me :) However, this still doesn't change my question as to why the size and timescale are so off.