Jump to content

Joukei

Premium Member
  • Posts

    3
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Nexus Mods Profile

About Joukei

Profile Fields

  • Country
    Canada

Joukei's Achievements

Newbie

Newbie (1/14)

  • First Post
  • Week One Done
  • One Month Later
  • One Year In

Recent Badges

0

Reputation

  1. Glad to see someone else posting Tatyana Rhyzkova, she's an amazing classical guitarist. Found her through Bach's Cello Suite No. 1, BMV 1007, Prelude. Anyway, "Tale of Two Cities" by Darren Rahn from his album Talk of the Town
  2. You've completely missed the point. Please take the time to re read the initial discussion.
  3. I'd love to see emphasis on the Aldmeri Dominion as a central antagonist :thumbsup: . As far as everything else goes, i'm fine with just about anything lol
  4. It depends on your definition of justice. To me, true justice has to weigh the good as well as the bad. A justice system that does not allow testimony as to a person's good character and acts before pronouncing sentence hardly seems like a justice system at all. Whether or not a person is remorseful should be considered in determining the severity of their sentence. It would make far more sense to demand the death of Odahviing, who was Alduin's chief lieutenant and doubtless responsible for plenty of atrocities while carrying out Alduin's orders. He shows no particular remorse or desire to atone, and shows nothing but distaste for the Way of the Voice. He only bends to your will because you've proven yourself stronger than Alduin. He makes it clear that he'd like to eat a few souls in Sovngarde himself except that Alduin doesn't allow other dov to have that priviledge. Odahviing is far more a bad guy than Paarthurnax. (And yet, he's kind of a lovable rascal, and I doubt I could bring myself to kill Odie, either. Unless he crosses me. :)) I hope this doesn't turn into a polemic. Great response though- it has me in pensive thought again :sleep: . It's a strong enough argument to cause me to oscillate between my choices :o To kill Paarthurnax (Alduin's old second in command, who's most likely responsible for thousands of deaths as scribed on Alduin's Wall), or to let Paarthurnax live (As he's shown wanting for atonement, after he's caused the atrocities). Regarding Odaviing though, his situation almost correlates to that of Paarthurnax's. should our judgement be this spiteful? Considering Paarthurnax's old hierarchy among the dragons; hypothetically, Paarthurnax must have been worse. Ode' can easily find motive for atonement after he's caused further atrocities. Who do we judge then? Should we kill the Dovah who are on a murderous onslaught and let live the ones that weren't caught because an existential event caused them to sway their choices? It's almost the same as an individual whom is part of a group to kill a persons family, then turning around and saying "I'm different now! Look, i'll help you kill the rest of my old group members!". In my opinion, it "doesn't make him better, it makes him worse." (Dalphine)
  5. I think the debatable two contradictory questions that are implied regarding the Blades and Paarthurnax's death is; "Should justice remove her blindfold and let past an individual who's "committed atrocities" (as stated by Esbern) because they've changed from the person they were?" or "Justice is blind; those who have committed such acts must be put to justice, regardless of their present self". This is a highly debatable topic today, especially regarding Nazi war criminals. If you think about it, Present day Nazi war criminals that took part in the holocaust can be preaching peace, love and understanding today. being totally different people from whom they once were. However, because of this, should we ignore what they've done in their past time and not put them to proper trial? The two situations are almost identical, in two different contexts. Note: i'm talking strictly individuals only here, not feuds between people- or dragons for that matter. An individuals actions don't reflect on its people. So, a mass extermination of Germans because of Hitler as a counter argument is completely off shooting the point, as it's irrelevant. -> At first i let Paarthurnax live because i was swayed by his words and wisdom. -> The second time, i killed him mercilessly to avenge the countless lives that he took- which in sum, probably doesn't morally accumulate to his worth. I take games way to seriously >.> Lol
×
×
  • Create New...