-
Posts
170 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Everything posted by Ankleon
-
Seriously, if you want to know so bad you can make a twitter account and ask him. Or just wait for the game. Obviously, noone here will know. (And you know how game-breaking it would be if one chicken reports a crime, but the player doesn't know? It's why they took out that bug.)
-
Definitly not. There's a DVD with behind the scenes stuff, making of Skyrim ect... Half life 2 was a linear game, and developer's placed nodes at keypoints. In Skyrim, there aren't any.
-
I was making breakfast!! I HAD TOASTED DAEDROTH!! Speaking of daedroth, did you see any Daedra other than what we have seen in the videos so far? I'm curious of dremora especially. Nope. What Daedra enemies have we seen? Haven't seen any actually..
-
I'm really sure there's no difference :P.
-
I can balance it, no problem. :D
-
An exclusive look at "towns, cities, and more"
Ankleon replied to erikface's topic in Skyrim's Skyrim LE
I THINK it's 4 , really not sure (: I'm going to bed anyway, I'll see it tomorrow. -
Todd´s response to the worries about the 6 GB
Ankleon replied to Fisrion's topic in Skyrim's Skyrim LE
So according to Todd Howard, seems rumor was for the most part, true. 50 GB in terms of actual content? That is frikkin' incredible! -
Todd´s response to the worries about the 6 GB
Ankleon replied to Fisrion's topic in Skyrim's Skyrim LE
Can someone explain why content =/= game size in terms of GB? Is it just about the compression? -
Todd´s response to the worries about the 6 GB
Ankleon replied to Fisrion's topic in Skyrim's Skyrim LE
No offense taken, it was my fault. @Coralfang: I think that if they've got a pretty good compression method you can still get 10GB to 6GB. Anyone want to correct/clarify? -
Todd´s response to the worries about the 6 GB
Ankleon replied to Fisrion's topic in Skyrim's Skyrim LE
Bitching about size I believe. Btw...awesome way to exit a room. Watch out with that word, my post on the first page got edited:( Sure learned my lesson. -
Todd´s response to the worries about the 6 GB
Ankleon replied to Fisrion's topic in Skyrim's Skyrim LE
Indeed, back to the GBs :P Anyway, I think they reacted quite good and quick at it, and their explanation is good. Not so worried anymore. -
Todd´s response to the worries about the 6 GB
Ankleon replied to Fisrion's topic in Skyrim's Skyrim LE
Not on Bethblog specifically, but a lot of forum users (from other forums, of course) and internet board users refrain to "Todd Howard - Don't believe his lies" if he uses words like "handcrafted" or "dynamic". -
Todd´s response to the worries about the 6 GB
Ankleon replied to Fisrion's topic in Skyrim's Skyrim LE
Then it's ok, I think I said it a bit too harsh in my first post, could be that people were confused whether it was my opinion or other's :P. -
Todd´s response to the worries about the 6 GB
Ankleon replied to Fisrion's topic in Skyrim's Skyrim LE
Todd? A liar? :confused: I think it's Peter Molyneux you are talking about. I [edit] hate it when I say the opinion of a lot of other people and they think it's mine! I do not think Todd is a liar, I grasp the situation why some of the things he said didn't come out as he said he did. I'm just saying a lot of people still think this. Why even carry tales, then? And watch your mouth. Pofanity edited. -myrmaad -
Todd´s response to the worries about the 6 GB
Ankleon replied to Fisrion's topic in Skyrim's Skyrim LE
That's just because of Oblivion and the 360 shenanigans...Todd wasn't lying; he was describing things that were included at the time, but had to be cut once they received the specs for the console. That's no reason to assume he's bs-ing you every time he speaks. For some people it is (but not for me). It's not just that though, it's also Fallouts 200 endings (but I believed that was a bogus website?). -
Todd´s response to the worries about the 6 GB
Ankleon replied to Fisrion's topic in Skyrim's Skyrim LE
Most people won't believe it exactly BECAUSE Todd says it. He's got a liar-reputation with a lot of people. -
Great interview! Footage has already been seen.
-
The Thread of Computers (aka will my computer run Skyrim)
Ankleon replied to Zeazer's topic in Skyrim's Skyrim LE
Google is your friend, there are extensive guides for installing RAM sticks. From what I hear ,it is not that difficult. -
He says something about installing, perhaps loading times intervals when installing on HD on Xbox?:P
-
Pete says console info is coming, what do they mean by this? What could they possible tell us?:P
-
Alright, let me compare this: My specs i7 2630QM 2.0 Ghz 4GB ram GT 540M 2,7 GB Skyrim specs Win XP/7, quad-core Intel/AMD CPU, 4GB RAM, 6GB HD, DX compat snd card, DX9 vid card w/ 1 GB. GTX 260/Radeon 4890 or higher First off, it says quad core intel. I have an intel, but my computer doesn't say if it's quadcore (I had to look it up) or not. People with experience can tell, most cannot, this is a first difficulty. 4GB of RAM can be confusing because of the recent questions about vista ect... and 32/64 bit computers. 6GB of HD was confusing as well, some people translated it as High Definition instead of hard disk! DX9 vid card, most people can't tell what they have unless checking can you run it. GTX 260/ Radeon 4890 or higher. People still can't tell what it means if numbers being higher or lower means better or worse. It doesn't list other brand than that (I think these two are the most popular), so people will still ask questions about those. Same goes for laptop video cards. Hope this explains a bit about why there are so many questions. People just want to know if they can run it, it doesn't mean they're experts.
-
i'm sorry if you think you're that much better than everyone else... :\ He's half right, now people can just compare their specs, of course they have to have the minimum and recommended ones to know. So yeah ,most people aren't good at these sort of things. Including me.
-
The Thread of Computers (aka will my computer run Skyrim)
Ankleon replied to Zeazer's topic in Skyrim's Skyrim LE
intel i7-2630QM 2,0 Ghz 4 GB RAM GT 540M -2.7 GB Anybody?:( -
Why is everyone saying that low specs means it's poorly optimized? Wasn't Oblivion poorly optimized exactly BECAUSE it required higher specs than neccesary?