In response to post #23413684.
i know that i am very late in giving this reply to you but i read the article (to the second or july 2009 trial) and it seems to me that the case and fines where not about the defendent downloading the songs, but about her willfully distributing them over a file shareing program. i will continue to read the article (if for no other reason than that it is interesting) to see if it mentions that it was the downloading and not distribution of the copyrited material that she was charged for.