Alehazar Posted December 2, 2013 Posted December 2, 2013 Sten says that after killing the people of a farmhold and some children he waited several days for the Bann's men to arrive, while Ser Bryant states that Sten was still wet with the blood of his victims. Slow drying blood? Or is the qunari a phylactery that is turned inside out?
Thandal Posted December 7, 2013 Posted December 7, 2013 Yeah, good catch. If Ser Bryant had used the word "covered" instead of "wet", I think it would have been just as gruesomely evocative, but also internally consistent!
LadyMizra Posted July 6, 2014 Posted July 6, 2014 Maybe Ser Bryant was mistaken? Humans make little mistakes all the time. Or, Sten had blood from something else on him. He killed a chicken! <.< I have no idea. lol
Thandal Posted July 7, 2014 Posted July 7, 2014 Maybe Ser Bryant was mistaken? Humans make little mistakes all the time. Or, Sten had blood from something else on him. He killed a chicken! <.< I have no idea. lol Nah, that was Shale! :laugh:
Alehazar Posted July 7, 2014 Author Posted July 7, 2014 Maybe Ser Bryant was mistaken? Humans make little mistakes all the time. Or, Sten had blood from something else on him. He killed a chicken! <.< I have no idea. lol Nah, that was Shale! :laugh: (Slightly off-topic) I once took Shale to Haven, to see whether the Golem would go berserk on the chickens that wandered there; I was slightly disappointed.
Recommended Posts